A case study of witness consistency and memory recovery across multiple investigative interviews

Yael Orbach, Michael E. Lamb, David J. La Rooy, Margaret-Ellen Pipe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 12 Citations

Abstract

Access to audio recordings of five interviews (Interviews 2–6), and to the interviewer's contemporaneous notes during an initial unrecorded interview, made it possible to assess consistency across repeated attempts by a 9-year-old to describe her older sister's abduction from their shared bedroom. Information provided in each of the interviews was systematically analysed to determine whether each unit of information was new, consistent (repeated) or contradictory in relation to earlier reported information and whether any informative detail provided in the witness' initial interview was subsequently omitted. In addition, the witness' accounts were compared with details provided by the victim upon her rescue. This case analysis is particularly informative in light of widespread professional concerns about the effects of repeated interviewing on the quality and accuracy of children's accounts of experienced events.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118–129
Number of pages12
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Witness
Interviews
Interviewing
Abduction
contradictory
Rescue
Siblings

Cite this

Orbach, Yael; Lamb, Michael E.; La Rooy, David J.; Pipe, Margaret-Ellen / A case study of witness consistency and memory recovery across multiple investigative interviews.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 118–129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bdb0f622511748e29116c4524c6eb4ab,
title = "A case study of witness consistency and memory recovery across multiple investigative interviews",
abstract = "Access to audio recordings of five interviews (Interviews 2–6), and to the interviewer's contemporaneous notes during an initial unrecorded interview, made it possible to assess consistency across repeated attempts by a 9-year-old to describe her older sister's abduction from their shared bedroom. Information provided in each of the interviews was systematically analysed to determine whether each unit of information was new, consistent (repeated) or contradictory in relation to earlier reported information and whether any informative detail provided in the witness' initial interview was subsequently omitted. In addition, the witness' accounts were compared with details provided by the victim upon her rescue. This case analysis is particularly informative in light of widespread professional concerns about the effects of repeated interviewing on the quality and accuracy of children's accounts of experienced events.",
author = "Yael Orbach and Lamb, {Michael E.} and {La Rooy}, {David J.} and Margaret-Ellen Pipe",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acp.1803",
volume = "26",
pages = "118–129",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

A case study of witness consistency and memory recovery across multiple investigative interviews. / Orbach, Yael; Lamb, Michael E.; La Rooy, David J.; Pipe, Margaret-Ellen.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 118–129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A case study of witness consistency and memory recovery across multiple investigative interviews

AU - Orbach,Yael

AU - Lamb,Michael E.

AU - La Rooy,David J.

AU - Pipe,Margaret-Ellen

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Access to audio recordings of five interviews (Interviews 2–6), and to the interviewer's contemporaneous notes during an initial unrecorded interview, made it possible to assess consistency across repeated attempts by a 9-year-old to describe her older sister's abduction from their shared bedroom. Information provided in each of the interviews was systematically analysed to determine whether each unit of information was new, consistent (repeated) or contradictory in relation to earlier reported information and whether any informative detail provided in the witness' initial interview was subsequently omitted. In addition, the witness' accounts were compared with details provided by the victim upon her rescue. This case analysis is particularly informative in light of widespread professional concerns about the effects of repeated interviewing on the quality and accuracy of children's accounts of experienced events.

AB - Access to audio recordings of five interviews (Interviews 2–6), and to the interviewer's contemporaneous notes during an initial unrecorded interview, made it possible to assess consistency across repeated attempts by a 9-year-old to describe her older sister's abduction from their shared bedroom. Information provided in each of the interviews was systematically analysed to determine whether each unit of information was new, consistent (repeated) or contradictory in relation to earlier reported information and whether any informative detail provided in the witness' initial interview was subsequently omitted. In addition, the witness' accounts were compared with details provided by the victim upon her rescue. This case analysis is particularly informative in light of widespread professional concerns about the effects of repeated interviewing on the quality and accuracy of children's accounts of experienced events.

U2 - 10.1002/acp.1803

DO - 10.1002/acp.1803

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 118

EP - 129

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

T2 - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 1

ER -