A comparison between the Cotonou Agreement and the EU Generalized System of Preferences

the case of sugar

Vanessa Constant LaForce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to critically analyse the trade preferences offered by the European Union (EU) to developing countries under the Cotonou Agreement and the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) in relation to trade in sugar. There is a need for a timely examination of this area, given the context of the ACP-EU Economic Partnership Agreements and the recent termination of the ACP-EU Sugar Protocol (SP). The paper focuses on the Caribbean region as a whole with a particular focus on two non-least developed ACP Caribbean countries, Guyana and Jamaica which held the largest sugar quotas among ACP Caribbean which benefited from the SP. The EU trade regime changes have affected the value of the African-Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) sugar trade regime and could have a serious impact on the amount of sugar available for purchase on the global market. The paper argues that ACP Caribbean countries could find more profitable to grow sugarcane as an agricultural commodity to produce biofuel, which is currently in high demand. The analysis in this paper is limited to the arrangements pertaining to developing countries and therefore excludes those relating to least developed countries. Trade in more highly processed sugars such as fructose or glucose, together with the growing trade in biofuel refined from sugar beet and sugar cane are also outwith the scope of this discussion. The paper deals with an intricate issue. It discusses the socio-economic impact of the trade regime changes on the selected Caribbean countries and includes a section on recommendations given the economic weight of sugar for these countries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-67
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of International Trade Law and Policy
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

biofuel
developing country
economic union
Guyana
Jamaica
Caribbean Region
trade union
economic impact
purchase
commodity
examination
demand
market
economics
Values
European Union
Africa

Cite this

@article{a22501af440b4a5888dec02647987c6a,
title = "A comparison between the Cotonou Agreement and the EU Generalized System of Preferences: the case of sugar",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to critically analyse the trade preferences offered by the European Union (EU) to developing countries under the Cotonou Agreement and the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) in relation to trade in sugar. There is a need for a timely examination of this area, given the context of the ACP-EU Economic Partnership Agreements and the recent termination of the ACP-EU Sugar Protocol (SP). The paper focuses on the Caribbean region as a whole with a particular focus on two non-least developed ACP Caribbean countries, Guyana and Jamaica which held the largest sugar quotas among ACP Caribbean which benefited from the SP. The EU trade regime changes have affected the value of the African-Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) sugar trade regime and could have a serious impact on the amount of sugar available for purchase on the global market. The paper argues that ACP Caribbean countries could find more profitable to grow sugarcane as an agricultural commodity to produce biofuel, which is currently in high demand. The analysis in this paper is limited to the arrangements pertaining to developing countries and therefore excludes those relating to least developed countries. Trade in more highly processed sugars such as fructose or glucose, together with the growing trade in biofuel refined from sugar beet and sugar cane are also outwith the scope of this discussion. The paper deals with an intricate issue. It discusses the socio-economic impact of the trade regime changes on the selected Caribbean countries and includes a section on recommendations given the economic weight of sugar for these countries.",
author = "{Constant LaForce}, Vanessa",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1108/14770021311312494",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "42--67",
journal = "Journal of International Trade Law and Policy",
issn = "1477-0024",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

A comparison between the Cotonou Agreement and the EU Generalized System of Preferences : the case of sugar. / Constant LaForce, Vanessa.

In: Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2013, p. 42-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison between the Cotonou Agreement and the EU Generalized System of Preferences

T2 - the case of sugar

AU - Constant LaForce, Vanessa

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The aim of this paper is to critically analyse the trade preferences offered by the European Union (EU) to developing countries under the Cotonou Agreement and the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) in relation to trade in sugar. There is a need for a timely examination of this area, given the context of the ACP-EU Economic Partnership Agreements and the recent termination of the ACP-EU Sugar Protocol (SP). The paper focuses on the Caribbean region as a whole with a particular focus on two non-least developed ACP Caribbean countries, Guyana and Jamaica which held the largest sugar quotas among ACP Caribbean which benefited from the SP. The EU trade regime changes have affected the value of the African-Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) sugar trade regime and could have a serious impact on the amount of sugar available for purchase on the global market. The paper argues that ACP Caribbean countries could find more profitable to grow sugarcane as an agricultural commodity to produce biofuel, which is currently in high demand. The analysis in this paper is limited to the arrangements pertaining to developing countries and therefore excludes those relating to least developed countries. Trade in more highly processed sugars such as fructose or glucose, together with the growing trade in biofuel refined from sugar beet and sugar cane are also outwith the scope of this discussion. The paper deals with an intricate issue. It discusses the socio-economic impact of the trade regime changes on the selected Caribbean countries and includes a section on recommendations given the economic weight of sugar for these countries.

AB - The aim of this paper is to critically analyse the trade preferences offered by the European Union (EU) to developing countries under the Cotonou Agreement and the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) in relation to trade in sugar. There is a need for a timely examination of this area, given the context of the ACP-EU Economic Partnership Agreements and the recent termination of the ACP-EU Sugar Protocol (SP). The paper focuses on the Caribbean region as a whole with a particular focus on two non-least developed ACP Caribbean countries, Guyana and Jamaica which held the largest sugar quotas among ACP Caribbean which benefited from the SP. The EU trade regime changes have affected the value of the African-Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) sugar trade regime and could have a serious impact on the amount of sugar available for purchase on the global market. The paper argues that ACP Caribbean countries could find more profitable to grow sugarcane as an agricultural commodity to produce biofuel, which is currently in high demand. The analysis in this paper is limited to the arrangements pertaining to developing countries and therefore excludes those relating to least developed countries. Trade in more highly processed sugars such as fructose or glucose, together with the growing trade in biofuel refined from sugar beet and sugar cane are also outwith the scope of this discussion. The paper deals with an intricate issue. It discusses the socio-economic impact of the trade regime changes on the selected Caribbean countries and includes a section on recommendations given the economic weight of sugar for these countries.

U2 - 10.1108/14770021311312494

DO - 10.1108/14770021311312494

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 42

EP - 67

JO - Journal of International Trade Law and Policy

JF - Journal of International Trade Law and Policy

SN - 1477-0024

IS - 1

ER -