A comparison of sex offenders and other types of offenders referred to intellectual disability forensic services

William R. Lindsay, Derek Carson, Anthony J. Holland, Amanda M. Michie, John L. Taylor, Marie Bambrick, Gregory O'Brien, Jessica R. Wheeler, Lesley Steptoe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)
    253 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This study compared 131 sex offenders with ID and 346 other types of offenders with ID using case file records. All the females in the study were non sexual offenders. Significantly more sexual offenders were referred from court and criminal justice services while significantly fewer were referred from secondary healthcare. A higher percentage of sex offenders had some form of legal status at time of referral. Greater proportions of non sexual offenders were referred for aggression, damage to property, substance abuse and fire setting while only the sex offenders had an index sex offence. For previous offending, the non sexual offenders had higher rates of aggression, cruelty and neglect of children, property damage and substance abuse while the sexual offenders had higher rates of previous sexual offending. For psychiatric disturbance and adversity in childhood, only ADHD showed a significant difference between groups with the non sexual offenders recording higher rates.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)566-576
    Number of pages11
    JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
    Volume19
    Issue number4
    Early online date4 Nov 2011
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • Characteristics
    • Intellectual disability
    • Non sex offenders
    • Sex offenders

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of sex offenders and other types of offenders referred to intellectual disability forensic services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this