A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques

Thanos Karatzias*, Kevin Power, Keith Brown, Theresa McGoldrick, Millia Begum, Jenny Young, Paul Loughran, Zoë Chouliara, Sally Adams

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study reports on the first ever controlled comparison between eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and emotional freedom techniques (EFT) for posttraumatic stress disorder. A total of 46 participants were randomized to either EMDR (n = 23) or EFT (n = 23). The participants were assessed at baseline and then reassessed after an 8-week waiting period. Two further blind assessments were conducted at posttreatment and 3-months follow-up. Overall, the results indicated that both interventions produced significant therapeutic gains at posttreatment and follow-up in an equal number of sessions. Similar treatment effect sizes were observed in both treatment groups. Regarding clinical significant changes, a slightly higher proportion of patients in the EMDR group produced substantial clinical changes compared with the EFT group. Given the speculative nature of the theoretical basis of EFT, a dismantling study on the active ingredients of EFT should be subject to future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)372-378
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Volume199
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Psychology
Therapeutics

Cite this

Karatzias, Thanos ; Power, Kevin ; Brown, Keith ; McGoldrick, Theresa ; Begum, Millia ; Young, Jenny ; Loughran, Paul ; Chouliara, Zoë ; Adams, Sally. / A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder : eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques. In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2011 ; Vol. 199, No. 6. pp. 372-378.
@article{03db4d717cdb404ab33375fbd5fbdac9,
title = "A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques",
abstract = "The present study reports on the first ever controlled comparison between eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and emotional freedom techniques (EFT) for posttraumatic stress disorder. A total of 46 participants were randomized to either EMDR (n = 23) or EFT (n = 23). The participants were assessed at baseline and then reassessed after an 8-week waiting period. Two further blind assessments were conducted at posttreatment and 3-months follow-up. Overall, the results indicated that both interventions produced significant therapeutic gains at posttreatment and follow-up in an equal number of sessions. Similar treatment effect sizes were observed in both treatment groups. Regarding clinical significant changes, a slightly higher proportion of patients in the EMDR group produced substantial clinical changes compared with the EFT group. Given the speculative nature of the theoretical basis of EFT, a dismantling study on the active ingredients of EFT should be subject to future research.",
author = "Thanos Karatzias and Kevin Power and Keith Brown and Theresa McGoldrick and Millia Begum and Jenny Young and Paul Loughran and Zo{\"e} Chouliara and Sally Adams",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/NMD.0b013e31821cd262",
language = "English",
volume = "199",
pages = "372--378",
journal = "Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease",
issn = "0022-3018",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder : eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques. / Karatzias, Thanos; Power, Kevin; Brown, Keith; McGoldrick, Theresa; Begum, Millia; Young, Jenny; Loughran, Paul; Chouliara, Zoë; Adams, Sally.

In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 199, No. 6, 01.06.2011, p. 372-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder

T2 - eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques

AU - Karatzias, Thanos

AU - Power, Kevin

AU - Brown, Keith

AU - McGoldrick, Theresa

AU - Begum, Millia

AU - Young, Jenny

AU - Loughran, Paul

AU - Chouliara, Zoë

AU - Adams, Sally

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - The present study reports on the first ever controlled comparison between eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and emotional freedom techniques (EFT) for posttraumatic stress disorder. A total of 46 participants were randomized to either EMDR (n = 23) or EFT (n = 23). The participants were assessed at baseline and then reassessed after an 8-week waiting period. Two further blind assessments were conducted at posttreatment and 3-months follow-up. Overall, the results indicated that both interventions produced significant therapeutic gains at posttreatment and follow-up in an equal number of sessions. Similar treatment effect sizes were observed in both treatment groups. Regarding clinical significant changes, a slightly higher proportion of patients in the EMDR group produced substantial clinical changes compared with the EFT group. Given the speculative nature of the theoretical basis of EFT, a dismantling study on the active ingredients of EFT should be subject to future research.

AB - The present study reports on the first ever controlled comparison between eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and emotional freedom techniques (EFT) for posttraumatic stress disorder. A total of 46 participants were randomized to either EMDR (n = 23) or EFT (n = 23). The participants were assessed at baseline and then reassessed after an 8-week waiting period. Two further blind assessments were conducted at posttreatment and 3-months follow-up. Overall, the results indicated that both interventions produced significant therapeutic gains at posttreatment and follow-up in an equal number of sessions. Similar treatment effect sizes were observed in both treatment groups. Regarding clinical significant changes, a slightly higher proportion of patients in the EMDR group produced substantial clinical changes compared with the EFT group. Given the speculative nature of the theoretical basis of EFT, a dismantling study on the active ingredients of EFT should be subject to future research.

U2 - 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31821cd262

DO - 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31821cd262

M3 - Article

C2 - 21629014

AN - SCOPUS:79958142629

VL - 199

SP - 372

EP - 378

JO - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

JF - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

SN - 0022-3018

IS - 6

ER -