Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques

  • Thanos Karatzias*
  • , Kevin Power
  • , Keith Brown
  • , Theresa McGoldrick
  • , Millia Begum
  • , Jenny Young
  • , Paul Loughran
  • , Zoë Chouliara
  • , Sally Adams
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The present study reports on the first ever controlled comparison between eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and emotional freedom techniques (EFT) for posttraumatic stress disorder. A total of 46 participants were randomized to either EMDR (n = 23) or EFT (n = 23). The participants were assessed at baseline and then reassessed after an 8-week waiting period. Two further blind assessments were conducted at posttreatment and 3-months follow-up. Overall, the results indicated that both interventions produced significant therapeutic gains at posttreatment and follow-up in an equal number of sessions. Similar treatment effect sizes were observed in both treatment groups. Regarding clinical significant changes, a slightly higher proportion of patients in the EMDR group produced substantial clinical changes compared with the EFT group. Given the speculative nature of the theoretical basis of EFT, a dismantling study on the active ingredients of EFT should be subject to future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)372-378
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Volume199
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this