A pluralistic framework for counselling and psychotherapy: Implications for research

Mick Cooper*, John McLeod

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    80 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Historically, training, research and practice in counselling and psychotherapy have been dominated by unitary theoretical models. Although integrative and eclectic positions have been developed as alternatives, these have not been successful in generating research and have resulted in a further proliferation of competing models. In this paper we introduce a ‘pluralistic’ framework for counselling and psychotherapy and discuss the implications of this framework for research. The basic principle of this pluralistic framework is that psychological difficulties may have multiple causes and that there is unlikely to be one, ‘right’ therapeutic method that will be appropriate in all situations—different people are helped by different processes at different times. This pluralistic framework operates as a meta-theory within which it is possible to utilise concepts, strategies and specific interventions from a range of therapeutic orientations. The framework is structured around three domains—goals, task and methods—by which therapeutic processes can be conceptualised, critically examined and empirically investigated. These domains, and the relationships between them, are outlined and the collaborative relationship at the heart of the pluralistic framework is discussed. The pluralistic framework provides a means for empirical research directly to inform practice and potential lines of empirical inquiry are outlined, along with findings from a recent study of counselling in schools.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)135-143
    Number of pages9
    JournalCounselling and Psychotherapy Research
    Volume7
    Issue number3
    Early online date10 Aug 2007
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A pluralistic framework for counselling and psychotherapy: Implications for research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this