Abstract
Objectives: The present paper outlines the initial development of an instrument to measure re-injury anxiety.
Methods: Face, content and factorial validity were examined over three stages of exploratory factor analyses.
Participants: 248 injured sport participants completed the scale.
Results: A 28-item measure was produced to measure re-injury anxiety, comprising of two factors: re-injury anxieties regarding rehabilitation (RIA-R: 15 items) and re-injury anxieties regarding returning to training/competition (RIA-RE: 13 items). These two factors accounted for 80.56% of the total variance. The internal consistency for both factors was above the .70 criterion value; rehabilitation re-injury anxiety (alpha = .98); re-entry into competition re-injury anxiety (alpha = .96).
Conclusions: Future research needs to test the proposed 2-factor model presented in the current research using confirmatory factor analysis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 23-29 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Physical Therapy in Sport |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2010 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
A preliminary development of the Re-Injury Anxiety Inventory (RIAI). / Walker, Natalie; Thatcher, Joanne; Lavallee, David.
In: Physical Therapy in Sport, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.02.2010, p. 23-29.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - A preliminary development of the Re-Injury Anxiety Inventory (RIAI)
AU - Walker, Natalie
AU - Thatcher, Joanne
AU - Lavallee, David
PY - 2010/2/1
Y1 - 2010/2/1
N2 - Objectives: The present paper outlines the initial development of an instrument to measure re-injury anxiety.Methods: Face, content and factorial validity were examined over three stages of exploratory factor analyses.Participants: 248 injured sport participants completed the scale.Results: A 28-item measure was produced to measure re-injury anxiety, comprising of two factors: re-injury anxieties regarding rehabilitation (RIA-R: 15 items) and re-injury anxieties regarding returning to training/competition (RIA-RE: 13 items). These two factors accounted for 80.56% of the total variance. The internal consistency for both factors was above the .70 criterion value; rehabilitation re-injury anxiety (alpha = .98); re-entry into competition re-injury anxiety (alpha = .96).Conclusions: Future research needs to test the proposed 2-factor model presented in the current research using confirmatory factor analysis.
AB - Objectives: The present paper outlines the initial development of an instrument to measure re-injury anxiety.Methods: Face, content and factorial validity were examined over three stages of exploratory factor analyses.Participants: 248 injured sport participants completed the scale.Results: A 28-item measure was produced to measure re-injury anxiety, comprising of two factors: re-injury anxieties regarding rehabilitation (RIA-R: 15 items) and re-injury anxieties regarding returning to training/competition (RIA-RE: 13 items). These two factors accounted for 80.56% of the total variance. The internal consistency for both factors was above the .70 criterion value; rehabilitation re-injury anxiety (alpha = .98); re-entry into competition re-injury anxiety (alpha = .96).Conclusions: Future research needs to test the proposed 2-factor model presented in the current research using confirmatory factor analysis.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2009.09.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ptsp.2009.09.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 20129120
AN - SCOPUS:74149087982
VL - 11
SP - 23
EP - 29
JO - Physical Therapy in Sport
JF - Physical Therapy in Sport
SN - 1873-1600
IS - 1
ER -