A randomized trial of face-to-face counselling versus telephone counselling versus bibliotherapy for occupational stress

Catherine Kilfedder, Kevin Power, Thanos Karatzias*, Aileen McCafferty, Karen Niven, Zoë Chouliara, Lisa Galloway, Stephen Sharp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and acceptability of three interventions for occupational stress. Methods/design. A total of 90 National Health Service employees were randomized to face-to-face counselling or telephone counselling or bibliotherapy. Outcomes were assessed at post-intervention and 4-month follow-up. Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) were used to evaluate intervention outcomes. An intention-to-treat analyses was performed. Results. Repeated measures analysis revealed significant time effects on all measures with the exception of CORE Risk. No significant group effects were detected on all outcome measures. No time by group significant interaction effects were detected on any of the outcome measures with the exception of CORE Functioning and GHQ total. With regard to acceptability of interventions, participants expressed a preference for face-to-face counselling over the other two modalities. Conclusions. Overall, it was concluded that the three intervention groups are equally effective. Given that bibliotherapy is the least costly of the three, results from the present study might be considered in relation to a stepped care approach to occupational stress management with bibliotherapy as the first line of intervention, followed by telephone and face-to-face counselling as required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-242
Number of pages20
JournalPsychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice
Volume83
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bibliotherapy
Telephone
Counseling
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Intention to Treat Analysis
National Health Programs
Health

Cite this

Kilfedder, Catherine ; Power, Kevin ; Karatzias, Thanos ; McCafferty, Aileen ; Niven, Karen ; Chouliara, Zoë ; Galloway, Lisa ; Sharp, Stephen. / A randomized trial of face-to-face counselling versus telephone counselling versus bibliotherapy for occupational stress. In: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2010 ; Vol. 83, No. 3. pp. 223-242.
@article{c8aff97d534b46a3a3fb69d015c8b9e0,
title = "A randomized trial of face-to-face counselling versus telephone counselling versus bibliotherapy for occupational stress",
abstract = "Objective. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and acceptability of three interventions for occupational stress. Methods/design. A total of 90 National Health Service employees were randomized to face-to-face counselling or telephone counselling or bibliotherapy. Outcomes were assessed at post-intervention and 4-month follow-up. Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) were used to evaluate intervention outcomes. An intention-to-treat analyses was performed. Results. Repeated measures analysis revealed significant time effects on all measures with the exception of CORE Risk. No significant group effects were detected on all outcome measures. No time by group significant interaction effects were detected on any of the outcome measures with the exception of CORE Functioning and GHQ total. With regard to acceptability of interventions, participants expressed a preference for face-to-face counselling over the other two modalities. Conclusions. Overall, it was concluded that the three intervention groups are equally effective. Given that bibliotherapy is the least costly of the three, results from the present study might be considered in relation to a stepped care approach to occupational stress management with bibliotherapy as the first line of intervention, followed by telephone and face-to-face counselling as required.",
author = "Catherine Kilfedder and Kevin Power and Thanos Karatzias and Aileen McCafferty and Karen Niven and Zo{\"e} Chouliara and Lisa Galloway and Stephen Sharp",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1348/147608309X476348",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "223--242",
journal = "Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice",
issn = "1476-0835",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

A randomized trial of face-to-face counselling versus telephone counselling versus bibliotherapy for occupational stress. / Kilfedder, Catherine; Power, Kevin; Karatzias, Thanos; McCafferty, Aileen; Niven, Karen; Chouliara, Zoë; Galloway, Lisa; Sharp, Stephen.

In: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, Vol. 83, No. 3, 01.09.2010, p. 223-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized trial of face-to-face counselling versus telephone counselling versus bibliotherapy for occupational stress

AU - Kilfedder, Catherine

AU - Power, Kevin

AU - Karatzias, Thanos

AU - McCafferty, Aileen

AU - Niven, Karen

AU - Chouliara, Zoë

AU - Galloway, Lisa

AU - Sharp, Stephen

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - Objective. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and acceptability of three interventions for occupational stress. Methods/design. A total of 90 National Health Service employees were randomized to face-to-face counselling or telephone counselling or bibliotherapy. Outcomes were assessed at post-intervention and 4-month follow-up. Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) were used to evaluate intervention outcomes. An intention-to-treat analyses was performed. Results. Repeated measures analysis revealed significant time effects on all measures with the exception of CORE Risk. No significant group effects were detected on all outcome measures. No time by group significant interaction effects were detected on any of the outcome measures with the exception of CORE Functioning and GHQ total. With regard to acceptability of interventions, participants expressed a preference for face-to-face counselling over the other two modalities. Conclusions. Overall, it was concluded that the three intervention groups are equally effective. Given that bibliotherapy is the least costly of the three, results from the present study might be considered in relation to a stepped care approach to occupational stress management with bibliotherapy as the first line of intervention, followed by telephone and face-to-face counselling as required.

AB - Objective. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and acceptability of three interventions for occupational stress. Methods/design. A total of 90 National Health Service employees were randomized to face-to-face counselling or telephone counselling or bibliotherapy. Outcomes were assessed at post-intervention and 4-month follow-up. Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) were used to evaluate intervention outcomes. An intention-to-treat analyses was performed. Results. Repeated measures analysis revealed significant time effects on all measures with the exception of CORE Risk. No significant group effects were detected on all outcome measures. No time by group significant interaction effects were detected on any of the outcome measures with the exception of CORE Functioning and GHQ total. With regard to acceptability of interventions, participants expressed a preference for face-to-face counselling over the other two modalities. Conclusions. Overall, it was concluded that the three intervention groups are equally effective. Given that bibliotherapy is the least costly of the three, results from the present study might be considered in relation to a stepped care approach to occupational stress management with bibliotherapy as the first line of intervention, followed by telephone and face-to-face counselling as required.

U2 - 10.1348/147608309X476348

DO - 10.1348/147608309X476348

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 223

EP - 242

JO - Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

JF - Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice

SN - 1476-0835

IS - 3

ER -