A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: a closer look” by Lund and Iyer

Simone Gittelson, Charles E. H. Berger, Graham Jackson, Ian W. Evett, Christophe Champod, Bernard Robertson, James M. Curran, Duncan Taylor, Bruce S. Weir, Michael D. Coble, John S. Buckleton

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    9 Citations (Scopus)
    302 Downloads (Pure)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: a closer look” by Lund and Iyer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Psychology

    Mathematics