Accounting for surface roughness effects in the near-infrared reflectance sensing of soils

Chun-Yu Wu, Astrid R. Jacobson, Magdeline Laba, Philippe C. Baveye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 34 Citations

Abstract

Near-infrared reflectance sensing (NIRS) has stimulated widespread enthusiasm in recent years among soil scientists, in part for its potential to lead to the design of new “proximal” soil sensors in support of precision agriculture, and to increase significantly the amount of information that can be obtained about soils from remote sensors. However, a practical difficulty this technique faces is that soils in the field, unlike the sieved, repacked soil samples used in the laboratory, are generally moist and have uneven surfaces, especially after tillage. Unfortunately, little is known at this point on the effect of surface roughness on NIR spectra. In this context, the present research focuses on the application of NIRS, under laboratory conditions, to chunks (artificially isolated particles or aggregates) of soil of average sizes between 0.04 and 8 mm, obtained in 5 different soils with contrasting features, and repacked in Petri dishes. NIRS measurements were performed when the soils were air-dry, and after rewetting to near-saturation. In virtually all cases, except at the finest chunk size in two soils, the near-infrared reflectance decreased regularly as chunk size increased. Nearsaturation of the soils with deionized water resulted in further decreases in reflectance, which obliterated to varying extent the dependence of the reflectance on chunk size. For most cases, whether the soils were dry or near-saturated, computation of the first derivative of the NIR spectra, especially when preceded by movingaverage or wavelet-based smoothing, resulted in transformed signals that were virtually independent of surface roughness in a number of distinct spectral regions. These observations suggest that in the range of soil chunk sizes considered, it might be possible practically to circumvent the dependence of NIRS on surface roughness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-180
Number of pages10
JournalGeoderma
Volume152
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Aug 2009

Fingerprint

soil
reflectance
near infrared
surface roughness
sensors (equipment)
sensor
precision agriculture
soil aggregates
tillage
soil sampling
chemical derivatives
air
water
methodology
wavelet
rewetting
soil air
smoothing
saturation

Cite this

Wu, C-Y., Jacobson, A. R., Laba, M., & Baveye, P. C. (2009). Accounting for surface roughness effects in the near-infrared reflectance sensing of soils. Geoderma, 152(1-2), 171-180. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.06.002

Wu, Chun-Yu; Jacobson, Astrid R.; Laba, Magdeline; Baveye, Philippe C. / Accounting for surface roughness effects in the near-infrared reflectance sensing of soils.

In: Geoderma, Vol. 152, No. 1-2, 15.08.2009, p. 171-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{be7fb74dc06d405aa413253de9947a8c,
title = "Accounting for surface roughness effects in the near-infrared reflectance sensing of soils",
abstract = "Near-infrared reflectance sensing (NIRS) has stimulated widespread enthusiasm in recent years among soil scientists, in part for its potential to lead to the design of new “proximal” soil sensors in support of precision agriculture, and to increase significantly the amount of information that can be obtained about soils from remote sensors. However, a practical difficulty this technique faces is that soils in the field, unlike the sieved, repacked soil samples used in the laboratory, are generally moist and have uneven surfaces, especially after tillage. Unfortunately, little is known at this point on the effect of surface roughness on NIR spectra. In this context, the present research focuses on the application of NIRS, under laboratory conditions, to chunks (artificially isolated particles or aggregates) of soil of average sizes between 0.04 and 8 mm, obtained in 5 different soils with contrasting features, and repacked in Petri dishes. NIRS measurements were performed when the soils were air-dry, and after rewetting to near-saturation. In virtually all cases, except at the finest chunk size in two soils, the near-infrared reflectance decreased regularly as chunk size increased. Nearsaturation of the soils with deionized water resulted in further decreases in reflectance, which obliterated to varying extent the dependence of the reflectance on chunk size. For most cases, whether the soils were dry or near-saturated, computation of the first derivative of the NIR spectra, especially when preceded by movingaverage or wavelet-based smoothing, resulted in transformed signals that were virtually independent of surface roughness in a number of distinct spectral regions. These observations suggest that in the range of soil chunk sizes considered, it might be possible practically to circumvent the dependence of NIRS on surface roughness.",
author = "Chun-Yu Wu and Jacobson, {Astrid R.} and Magdeline Laba and Baveye, {Philippe C.}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.06.002",
volume = "152",
pages = "171--180",
journal = "Geoderma",
issn = "0016-7061",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

Wu, C-Y, Jacobson, AR, Laba, M & Baveye, PC 2009, 'Accounting for surface roughness effects in the near-infrared reflectance sensing of soils' Geoderma, vol 152, no. 1-2, pp. 171-180. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.06.002

Accounting for surface roughness effects in the near-infrared reflectance sensing of soils. / Wu, Chun-Yu; Jacobson, Astrid R.; Laba, Magdeline; Baveye, Philippe C.

In: Geoderma, Vol. 152, No. 1-2, 15.08.2009, p. 171-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting for surface roughness effects in the near-infrared reflectance sensing of soils

AU - Wu,Chun-Yu

AU - Jacobson,Astrid R.

AU - Laba,Magdeline

AU - Baveye,Philippe C.

PY - 2009/8/15

Y1 - 2009/8/15

N2 - Near-infrared reflectance sensing (NIRS) has stimulated widespread enthusiasm in recent years among soil scientists, in part for its potential to lead to the design of new “proximal” soil sensors in support of precision agriculture, and to increase significantly the amount of information that can be obtained about soils from remote sensors. However, a practical difficulty this technique faces is that soils in the field, unlike the sieved, repacked soil samples used in the laboratory, are generally moist and have uneven surfaces, especially after tillage. Unfortunately, little is known at this point on the effect of surface roughness on NIR spectra. In this context, the present research focuses on the application of NIRS, under laboratory conditions, to chunks (artificially isolated particles or aggregates) of soil of average sizes between 0.04 and 8 mm, obtained in 5 different soils with contrasting features, and repacked in Petri dishes. NIRS measurements were performed when the soils were air-dry, and after rewetting to near-saturation. In virtually all cases, except at the finest chunk size in two soils, the near-infrared reflectance decreased regularly as chunk size increased. Nearsaturation of the soils with deionized water resulted in further decreases in reflectance, which obliterated to varying extent the dependence of the reflectance on chunk size. For most cases, whether the soils were dry or near-saturated, computation of the first derivative of the NIR spectra, especially when preceded by movingaverage or wavelet-based smoothing, resulted in transformed signals that were virtually independent of surface roughness in a number of distinct spectral regions. These observations suggest that in the range of soil chunk sizes considered, it might be possible practically to circumvent the dependence of NIRS on surface roughness.

AB - Near-infrared reflectance sensing (NIRS) has stimulated widespread enthusiasm in recent years among soil scientists, in part for its potential to lead to the design of new “proximal” soil sensors in support of precision agriculture, and to increase significantly the amount of information that can be obtained about soils from remote sensors. However, a practical difficulty this technique faces is that soils in the field, unlike the sieved, repacked soil samples used in the laboratory, are generally moist and have uneven surfaces, especially after tillage. Unfortunately, little is known at this point on the effect of surface roughness on NIR spectra. In this context, the present research focuses on the application of NIRS, under laboratory conditions, to chunks (artificially isolated particles or aggregates) of soil of average sizes between 0.04 and 8 mm, obtained in 5 different soils with contrasting features, and repacked in Petri dishes. NIRS measurements were performed when the soils were air-dry, and after rewetting to near-saturation. In virtually all cases, except at the finest chunk size in two soils, the near-infrared reflectance decreased regularly as chunk size increased. Nearsaturation of the soils with deionized water resulted in further decreases in reflectance, which obliterated to varying extent the dependence of the reflectance on chunk size. For most cases, whether the soils were dry or near-saturated, computation of the first derivative of the NIR spectra, especially when preceded by movingaverage or wavelet-based smoothing, resulted in transformed signals that were virtually independent of surface roughness in a number of distinct spectral regions. These observations suggest that in the range of soil chunk sizes considered, it might be possible practically to circumvent the dependence of NIRS on surface roughness.

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 152

SP - 171

EP - 180

JO - Geoderma

T2 - Geoderma

JF - Geoderma

SN - 0016-7061

IS - 1-2

ER -

Wu C-Y, Jacobson AR, Laba M, Baveye PC. Accounting for surface roughness effects in the near-infrared reflectance sensing of soils. Geoderma. 2009 Aug 15;152(1-2):171-180. Available from, DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.06.002