Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnership

C. Bovill*, A. Cook-Sather, P. Felten, L. Millard, N. Moore-Cherry

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

236 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Against a backdrop of rising interest in students becoming partners in learning and teaching in higher education, this paper begins by exploring the relationships between student engagement, co-creation and student–staff partnership before providing a typology of the roles students can assume in working collaboratively with staff. Acknowledging that co-creating learning and teaching is not straightforward, a set of examples from higher education institutions in Europe and North America illustrates some important challenges that can arise during co-creation. These examples also provide the basis for suggestions regarding how such challenges might be resolved or re-envisaged as opportunities for more meaningful collaboration. The challenges are presented under three headings: resistance to co-creation; navigating institutional structures, practices and norms; and establishing an inclusive co-creation approach. The paper concludes by highlighting the importance of transparency within co-creation approaches and of changing mindsets about the potential opportunities and institutional benefits of staff and students co-creating learning and teaching.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-208
Number of pages14
JournalHigher Education
Volume71
Issue number2
Early online date14 May 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Co-creation
  • Partnership
  • Student engagement
  • Democratic education
  • Diversity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this