Against homeopathy - a utilitarian perspective

Kevin R. Smith

doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01876.x

Against homeopathy - a utilitarian perspective

Kevin R. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I examine the positive and negative features of homeopathy from an ethical perspective. I consider: (a) several potentially beneficial features of homeopathy, including non-invasiveness, cost-effectiveness, holism, placebo benefits and agent autonomy; and (b) several potentially negative features of homeopathy, including failure to seek effective healthcare, wastage of resources, promulgation of false beliefs and a weakening of commitment to scientific medicine. A utilitarian analysis of the utilities and disutilities leads to the conclusion that homeopathy is ethically unacceptable and ought to be actively rejected by healthcare professionals.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	398–409
Number of pages	12
Journal	Bioethics
Volume	26
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01876.x
Publication status	Published - Oct 2012

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01876.x

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Against homeopathy - a utilitarian perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{99d5025942c64d069b210bfdc4dab98e,

title = "Against homeopathy - a utilitarian perspective",

abstract = "I examine the positive and negative features of homeopathy from an ethical perspective. I consider: (a) several potentially beneficial features of homeopathy, including non-invasiveness, cost-effectiveness, holism, placebo benefits and agent autonomy; and (b) several potentially negative features of homeopathy, including failure to seek effective healthcare, wastage of resources, promulgation of false beliefs and a weakening of commitment to scientific medicine. A utilitarian analysis of the utilities and disutilities leads to the conclusion that homeopathy is ethically unacceptable and ought to be actively rejected by healthcare professionals.",

author = "Smith, {Kevin R.}",

year = "2012",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01876.x",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "398–409",

journal = "Bioethics",

issn = "0269-9702",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Against homeopathy - a utilitarian perspective

AU - Smith, Kevin R.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - I examine the positive and negative features of homeopathy from an ethical perspective. I consider: (a) several potentially beneficial features of homeopathy, including non-invasiveness, cost-effectiveness, holism, placebo benefits and agent autonomy; and (b) several potentially negative features of homeopathy, including failure to seek effective healthcare, wastage of resources, promulgation of false beliefs and a weakening of commitment to scientific medicine. A utilitarian analysis of the utilities and disutilities leads to the conclusion that homeopathy is ethically unacceptable and ought to be actively rejected by healthcare professionals.

AB - I examine the positive and negative features of homeopathy from an ethical perspective. I consider: (a) several potentially beneficial features of homeopathy, including non-invasiveness, cost-effectiveness, holism, placebo benefits and agent autonomy; and (b) several potentially negative features of homeopathy, including failure to seek effective healthcare, wastage of resources, promulgation of false beliefs and a weakening of commitment to scientific medicine. A utilitarian analysis of the utilities and disutilities leads to the conclusion that homeopathy is ethically unacceptable and ought to be actively rejected by healthcare professionals.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01876.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01876.x

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 398

EP - 409

JO - Bioethics

JF - Bioethics

SN - 0269-9702

IS - 8

ER -