An assessment of the cost effectiveness of vegetation harvesting as a means of removing nutrient and metals from ponds

Fiona Napier, M. Barrett, Christopher Jefferies

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

This paper reports on an investigation to quantify the mass of pollutants removed from a stormwater retention pond by routine vegetation harvesting. The amount of plants can increase the costs of ponds, and the increased costs of plant maintenance may not be justified by enhanced pollutant removal. This study provides some of the basic information, previously lacking, which is needed to come to such decisions. The study facility was La Costa pond, a retention pond in California used to treat highway runoff. Water quality monitoring data indicate that the pond removed 43 percent of the total nitrogen entering the facility, with 5 to 7 percent directly attributable to harvesting the vegetation – in this case cattails (Typha). The data also indicate that 48 percent of the total annual phosphorus was removed from the runoff, with the harvested vegetation responsible for between 3 and 8 percent. Metal uptake by the vegetation was substantially less than nutrients. Total removal of copper, lead and zinc by the pond varied between 57 and 93 percent, with the harvested vegetation accounting for less than 2 percent of removal. Issues addressed in the paper include the cost implications of harvesting and ways of improving vegetative pollutant removal.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
StatePublished - 25 Aug 2005
Event10th International Conference on Urban Drainage - Copenhagen, Denmark

Conference

Conference10th International Conference on Urban Drainage
Abbreviated title10 ICUD
CountryDenmark
CityCopenhagen
Period21/08/0526/08/05

Fingerprint

pond
vegetation
cost
pollutant removal
runoff
nutrient
metal
stormwater
zinc
copper
road
phosphorus
water quality
pollutant
nitrogen
monitoring

Cite this

Napier, F., Barrett, M., & Jefferies, C. (2005). An assessment of the cost effectiveness of vegetation harvesting as a means of removing nutrient and metals from ponds. Paper presented at 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Napier, Fiona; Barrett, M.; Jefferies, Christopher / An assessment of the cost effectiveness of vegetation harvesting as a means of removing nutrient and metals from ponds.

2005. Paper presented at 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

@misc{7a2bc7e5ae0243e18054f6f943752a17,
title = "An assessment of the cost effectiveness of vegetation harvesting as a means of removing nutrient and metals from ponds",
abstract = "This paper reports on an investigation to quantify the mass of pollutants removed from a stormwater retention pond by routine vegetation harvesting. The amount of plants can increase the costs of ponds, and the increased costs of plant maintenance may not be justified by enhanced pollutant removal. This study provides some of the basic information, previously lacking, which is needed to come to such decisions. The study facility was La Costa pond, a retention pond in California used to treat highway runoff. Water quality monitoring data indicate that the pond removed 43 percent of the total nitrogen entering the facility, with 5 to 7 percent directly attributable to harvesting the vegetation – in this case cattails (Typha). The data also indicate that 48 percent of the total annual phosphorus was removed from the runoff, with the harvested vegetation responsible for between 3 and 8 percent. Metal uptake by the vegetation was substantially less than nutrients. Total removal of copper, lead and zinc by the pond varied between 57 and 93 percent, with the harvested vegetation accounting for less than 2 percent of removal. Issues addressed in the paper include the cost implications of harvesting and ways of improving vegetative pollutant removal.",
author = "Fiona Napier and M. Barrett and Christopher Jefferies",
year = "2005",
month = "8",

}

Napier, F, Barrett, M & Jefferies, C 2005, 'An assessment of the cost effectiveness of vegetation harvesting as a means of removing nutrient and metals from ponds' Paper presented at 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21/08/05 - 26/08/05, .

An assessment of the cost effectiveness of vegetation harvesting as a means of removing nutrient and metals from ponds. / Napier, Fiona; Barrett, M.; Jefferies, Christopher.

2005. Paper presented at 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - An assessment of the cost effectiveness of vegetation harvesting as a means of removing nutrient and metals from ponds

AU - Napier,Fiona

AU - Barrett,M.

AU - Jefferies,Christopher

PY - 2005/8/25

Y1 - 2005/8/25

N2 - This paper reports on an investigation to quantify the mass of pollutants removed from a stormwater retention pond by routine vegetation harvesting. The amount of plants can increase the costs of ponds, and the increased costs of plant maintenance may not be justified by enhanced pollutant removal. This study provides some of the basic information, previously lacking, which is needed to come to such decisions. The study facility was La Costa pond, a retention pond in California used to treat highway runoff. Water quality monitoring data indicate that the pond removed 43 percent of the total nitrogen entering the facility, with 5 to 7 percent directly attributable to harvesting the vegetation – in this case cattails (Typha). The data also indicate that 48 percent of the total annual phosphorus was removed from the runoff, with the harvested vegetation responsible for between 3 and 8 percent. Metal uptake by the vegetation was substantially less than nutrients. Total removal of copper, lead and zinc by the pond varied between 57 and 93 percent, with the harvested vegetation accounting for less than 2 percent of removal. Issues addressed in the paper include the cost implications of harvesting and ways of improving vegetative pollutant removal.

AB - This paper reports on an investigation to quantify the mass of pollutants removed from a stormwater retention pond by routine vegetation harvesting. The amount of plants can increase the costs of ponds, and the increased costs of plant maintenance may not be justified by enhanced pollutant removal. This study provides some of the basic information, previously lacking, which is needed to come to such decisions. The study facility was La Costa pond, a retention pond in California used to treat highway runoff. Water quality monitoring data indicate that the pond removed 43 percent of the total nitrogen entering the facility, with 5 to 7 percent directly attributable to harvesting the vegetation – in this case cattails (Typha). The data also indicate that 48 percent of the total annual phosphorus was removed from the runoff, with the harvested vegetation responsible for between 3 and 8 percent. Metal uptake by the vegetation was substantially less than nutrients. Total removal of copper, lead and zinc by the pond varied between 57 and 93 percent, with the harvested vegetation accounting for less than 2 percent of removal. Issues addressed in the paper include the cost implications of harvesting and ways of improving vegetative pollutant removal.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Napier F, Barrett M, Jefferies C. An assessment of the cost effectiveness of vegetation harvesting as a means of removing nutrient and metals from ponds. 2005. Paper presented at 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Copenhagen, Denmark.