An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children

Becky Earhart, David J. La Rooy, Sonja P. Brubacher, Michael E. Lamb

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issue

12 Citations (Scopus)
39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Most experimental studies examining the use of pre-interview instructions (ground rules) show that children say “I don't know” more often when they have been encouraged to do so when appropriate. However, children's “don't know” responses have not been studied in more applied contexts, such as in investigative interviews. In the present study, 76 transcripts of investigative interviews with allegedly abused children revealed patterns of “don't know” responding, as well as interviewers’ reactions to these responses. Instructions to say “I don't know” when appropriate did not affect the frequency with which children gave these responses. Interviewers rejected “don't know” responses nearly 30% of the time, and typically continued to ask about the same topic using more risky questions. Children often answered these follow-up questions even though they had previously indicated that they lacked the requested information. There was no evidence that “don't know” responses indicated reluctance to talk about abuse. Implications for forensic interviewers are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to) 746–761
Number of pages16
JournalBehavioral Sciences & the Law
Volume32
Issue number6
Early online date25 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Interviews
examination
interview
instruction
abuse
evidence

Cite this

Earhart, Becky ; La Rooy, David J. ; Brubacher, Sonja P. ; Lamb, Michael E. / An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children. In: Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 2014 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 746–761.
@article{08ea2b9948d447e995bcb17e1824f185,
title = "An examination of {"}don't know{"} responses in forensic interviews with children",
abstract = "Most experimental studies examining the use of pre-interview instructions (ground rules) show that children say “I don't know” more often when they have been encouraged to do so when appropriate. However, children's “don't know” responses have not been studied in more applied contexts, such as in investigative interviews. In the present study, 76 transcripts of investigative interviews with allegedly abused children revealed patterns of “don't know” responding, as well as interviewers’ reactions to these responses. Instructions to say “I don't know” when appropriate did not affect the frequency with which children gave these responses. Interviewers rejected “don't know” responses nearly 30{\%} of the time, and typically continued to ask about the same topic using more risky questions. Children often answered these follow-up questions even though they had previously indicated that they lacked the requested information. There was no evidence that “don't know” responses indicated reluctance to talk about abuse. Implications for forensic interviewers are discussed.",
author = "Becky Earhart and {La Rooy}, {David J.} and Brubacher, {Sonja P.} and Lamb, {Michael E.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.2141",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "746–761",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Earhart, B, La Rooy, DJ, Brubacher, SP & Lamb, ME 2014, 'An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children', Behavioral Sciences & the Law, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 746–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2141

An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children. / Earhart, Becky; La Rooy, David J.; Brubacher, Sonja P.; Lamb, Michael E.

In: Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Vol. 32, No. 6, 23.12.2014, p. 746–761.

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issue

TY - JOUR

T1 - An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children

AU - Earhart, Becky

AU - La Rooy, David J.

AU - Brubacher, Sonja P.

AU - Lamb, Michael E.

PY - 2014/12/23

Y1 - 2014/12/23

N2 - Most experimental studies examining the use of pre-interview instructions (ground rules) show that children say “I don't know” more often when they have been encouraged to do so when appropriate. However, children's “don't know” responses have not been studied in more applied contexts, such as in investigative interviews. In the present study, 76 transcripts of investigative interviews with allegedly abused children revealed patterns of “don't know” responding, as well as interviewers’ reactions to these responses. Instructions to say “I don't know” when appropriate did not affect the frequency with which children gave these responses. Interviewers rejected “don't know” responses nearly 30% of the time, and typically continued to ask about the same topic using more risky questions. Children often answered these follow-up questions even though they had previously indicated that they lacked the requested information. There was no evidence that “don't know” responses indicated reluctance to talk about abuse. Implications for forensic interviewers are discussed.

AB - Most experimental studies examining the use of pre-interview instructions (ground rules) show that children say “I don't know” more often when they have been encouraged to do so when appropriate. However, children's “don't know” responses have not been studied in more applied contexts, such as in investigative interviews. In the present study, 76 transcripts of investigative interviews with allegedly abused children revealed patterns of “don't know” responding, as well as interviewers’ reactions to these responses. Instructions to say “I don't know” when appropriate did not affect the frequency with which children gave these responses. Interviewers rejected “don't know” responses nearly 30% of the time, and typically continued to ask about the same topic using more risky questions. Children often answered these follow-up questions even though they had previously indicated that they lacked the requested information. There was no evidence that “don't know” responses indicated reluctance to talk about abuse. Implications for forensic interviewers are discussed.

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.2141

DO - 10.1002/bsl.2141

M3 - Special issue

VL - 32

SP - 746

EP - 761

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 6

ER -