Behavioral conservatism is linked to complexity of behavior in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

implications for cognition and cumulative culture

Sarah J. Davis*, Steven J. Schapiro, Susan P. Lambeth, Lara A. Wood, Andrew Whiten

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cumulative culture is rare, if not altogether absent in nonhuman species. At the foundation of cumulative learning is the ability to modify, relinquish, or build upon previous behaviors flexibly to make them more productive or efficient. Within the primate literature, a failure to optimize solutions in this way is often proposed to derive from low-fidelity copying of witnessed behaviors, suboptimal social learning heuristics, or a lack of relevant sociocognitive adaptations. However, humans can also be markedly inflexible in their behaviors, perseverating with, or becoming fixated on, outdated or inappropriate responses. Humans show differential patterns of flexibility as a function of cognitive load, exhibiting difficulties with inhibiting suboptimal behaviors when there are high demands on working memory. We present a series of studies on captive chimpanzees that indicate that behavioral conservatism in apes may be underlain by similar constraints: Chimpanzees showed relatively little conservatism when behavioral optimization involved the inhibition of a well-established but simple solution, or the addition of a simple modification to a well-established but complex solution. In contrast, when behavioral optimization involved the inhibition of a well-established but complex solution, chimpanzees showed evidence of conservatism. We propose that conservatism is linked to behavioral complexity, potentially mediated by cognitive resource availability, and may be an important factor in the evolution of cumulative culture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-35
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Comparative Psychology
Volume133
Issue number1
Early online date19 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Pan troglodytes
cognition
Politics
Cognition
learning
social behavior
Pongidae
resource availability
heuristics
primate
Aptitude
Hominidae
Primates
Short-Term Memory
Learning
Inhibition (Psychology)

Cite this

@article{fd4cbdc11aae4993b38d3ecca6ff0b0d,
title = "Behavioral conservatism is linked to complexity of behavior in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): implications for cognition and cumulative culture",
abstract = "Cumulative culture is rare, if not altogether absent in nonhuman species. At the foundation of cumulative learning is the ability to modify, relinquish, or build upon previous behaviors flexibly to make them more productive or efficient. Within the primate literature, a failure to optimize solutions in this way is often proposed to derive from low-fidelity copying of witnessed behaviors, suboptimal social learning heuristics, or a lack of relevant sociocognitive adaptations. However, humans can also be markedly inflexible in their behaviors, perseverating with, or becoming fixated on, outdated or inappropriate responses. Humans show differential patterns of flexibility as a function of cognitive load, exhibiting difficulties with inhibiting suboptimal behaviors when there are high demands on working memory. We present a series of studies on captive chimpanzees that indicate that behavioral conservatism in apes may be underlain by similar constraints: Chimpanzees showed relatively little conservatism when behavioral optimization involved the inhibition of a well-established but simple solution, or the addition of a simple modification to a well-established but complex solution. In contrast, when behavioral optimization involved the inhibition of a well-established but complex solution, chimpanzees showed evidence of conservatism. We propose that conservatism is linked to behavioral complexity, potentially mediated by cognitive resource availability, and may be an important factor in the evolution of cumulative culture.",
author = "Davis, {Sarah J.} and Schapiro, {Steven J.} and Lambeth, {Susan P.} and Wood, {Lara A.} and Andrew Whiten",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/com0000123",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "20--35",
journal = "Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)",
issn = "0735-7036",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Behavioral conservatism is linked to complexity of behavior in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) : implications for cognition and cumulative culture. / Davis, Sarah J.; Schapiro, Steven J.; Lambeth, Susan P.; Wood, Lara A.; Whiten, Andrew.

In: Journal of Comparative Psychology, Vol. 133, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 20-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral conservatism is linked to complexity of behavior in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

T2 - implications for cognition and cumulative culture

AU - Davis, Sarah J.

AU - Schapiro, Steven J.

AU - Lambeth, Susan P.

AU - Wood, Lara A.

AU - Whiten, Andrew

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Cumulative culture is rare, if not altogether absent in nonhuman species. At the foundation of cumulative learning is the ability to modify, relinquish, or build upon previous behaviors flexibly to make them more productive or efficient. Within the primate literature, a failure to optimize solutions in this way is often proposed to derive from low-fidelity copying of witnessed behaviors, suboptimal social learning heuristics, or a lack of relevant sociocognitive adaptations. However, humans can also be markedly inflexible in their behaviors, perseverating with, or becoming fixated on, outdated or inappropriate responses. Humans show differential patterns of flexibility as a function of cognitive load, exhibiting difficulties with inhibiting suboptimal behaviors when there are high demands on working memory. We present a series of studies on captive chimpanzees that indicate that behavioral conservatism in apes may be underlain by similar constraints: Chimpanzees showed relatively little conservatism when behavioral optimization involved the inhibition of a well-established but simple solution, or the addition of a simple modification to a well-established but complex solution. In contrast, when behavioral optimization involved the inhibition of a well-established but complex solution, chimpanzees showed evidence of conservatism. We propose that conservatism is linked to behavioral complexity, potentially mediated by cognitive resource availability, and may be an important factor in the evolution of cumulative culture.

AB - Cumulative culture is rare, if not altogether absent in nonhuman species. At the foundation of cumulative learning is the ability to modify, relinquish, or build upon previous behaviors flexibly to make them more productive or efficient. Within the primate literature, a failure to optimize solutions in this way is often proposed to derive from low-fidelity copying of witnessed behaviors, suboptimal social learning heuristics, or a lack of relevant sociocognitive adaptations. However, humans can also be markedly inflexible in their behaviors, perseverating with, or becoming fixated on, outdated or inappropriate responses. Humans show differential patterns of flexibility as a function of cognitive load, exhibiting difficulties with inhibiting suboptimal behaviors when there are high demands on working memory. We present a series of studies on captive chimpanzees that indicate that behavioral conservatism in apes may be underlain by similar constraints: Chimpanzees showed relatively little conservatism when behavioral optimization involved the inhibition of a well-established but simple solution, or the addition of a simple modification to a well-established but complex solution. In contrast, when behavioral optimization involved the inhibition of a well-established but complex solution, chimpanzees showed evidence of conservatism. We propose that conservatism is linked to behavioral complexity, potentially mediated by cognitive resource availability, and may be an important factor in the evolution of cumulative culture.

U2 - 10.1037/com0000123

DO - 10.1037/com0000123

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 20

EP - 35

JO - Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)

JF - Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)

SN - 0735-7036

IS - 1

ER -