Abstract
Patients with borderline personality disorder are frequent users of inpatient mental health units, with inpatient crisis intervention often used based on the risk of suicide. However, this can present an ethical dilemma for nursing and medical staff, with these clinician responses shifting between the moral principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, dependent on the outcomes of the actions of containing or tolerating risk. This article examines the use of crisis intervention through moral duties, intentions and consequences, culminating in an action/consequence model of risk management, used to explore potential outcomes. This model may be useful in measuring adherence and violation of the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence and therefore an aid to clinical decision making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 918-927 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Nursing Ethics |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Early online date | 19 Jan 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Beneficence
- Borderline personality disorder
- Ethics
- Non-maleficence
- Risk management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Borderline personality disorder and the ethics of risk management: the action/consequence model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver