Borderline personality disorder and the ethics of risk management: the action/consequence model

Dan Warrender*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients with borderline personality disorder are frequent users of inpatient mental health units, with inpatient crisis intervention often used based on the risk of suicide. However, this can present an ethical dilemma for nursing and medical staff, with these clinician responses shifting between the moral principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, dependent on the outcomes of the actions of containing or tolerating risk. This article examines the use of crisis intervention through moral duties, intentions and consequences, culminating in an action/consequence model of risk management, used to explore potential outcomes. This model may be useful in measuring adherence and violation of the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence and therefore an aid to clinical decision making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)918-927
Number of pages10
JournalNursing Ethics
Volume25
Issue number7
Early online date19 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Beneficence
  • Borderline personality disorder
  • Ethics
  • Non-maleficence
  • Risk management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Borderline personality disorder and the ethics of risk management: the action/consequence model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this