Climate change and intellectual property

Enrico Bonadio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 4 Citations

Abstract

The article first highlights the poor results obtained by the 2009 Copenhagen Conference with reference to Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs), particularly climate technologies. It stresses that in the Copenhagen Accord there is no specific reference to intellectual property rights (IPRs) as a necessary tool to stimulate the transfer of climate technologies, especially to developing countries. The author argues that in certain cases IPRs are capable of obstructing the dissemination across countries of ESTs. This seems to be confirmed (i) by how IPRs legislations are devised in industrialized countries (e.g. the Bayh-Dole Act in the US) and (ii) by a sharp increasing of international patent litigation in this field. Some possible solutions to the above problem and recommendations are finally provided.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72-76
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Risk Regulation
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

intellectual property
technology
right of ownership
climate
industrial nation
patent
climate change
legislation
act
developing country
transfer
conference
International
tool
problem

Cite this

Bonadio, Enrico / Climate change and intellectual property.

In: European Journal of Risk Regulation, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, p. 72-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f2c6dae2d3854a90a8c320a9dc7d0921,
title = "Climate change and intellectual property",
abstract = "The article first highlights the poor results obtained by the 2009 Copenhagen Conference with reference to Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs), particularly climate technologies. It stresses that in the Copenhagen Accord there is no specific reference to intellectual property rights (IPRs) as a necessary tool to stimulate the transfer of climate technologies, especially to developing countries. The author argues that in certain cases IPRs are capable of obstructing the dissemination across countries of ESTs. This seems to be confirmed (i) by how IPRs legislations are devised in industrialized countries (e.g. the Bayh-Dole Act in the US) and (ii) by a sharp increasing of international patent litigation in this field. Some possible solutions to the above problem and recommendations are finally provided.",
author = "Enrico Bonadio",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1017/S1867299X00000088",
volume = "1",
pages = "72--76",
journal = "European Journal of Risk Regulation",
issn = "1867-299X",
publisher = "Lexxion",
number = "1",

}

Climate change and intellectual property. / Bonadio, Enrico.

In: European Journal of Risk Regulation, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, p. 72-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Climate change and intellectual property

AU - Bonadio,Enrico

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The article first highlights the poor results obtained by the 2009 Copenhagen Conference with reference to Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs), particularly climate technologies. It stresses that in the Copenhagen Accord there is no specific reference to intellectual property rights (IPRs) as a necessary tool to stimulate the transfer of climate technologies, especially to developing countries. The author argues that in certain cases IPRs are capable of obstructing the dissemination across countries of ESTs. This seems to be confirmed (i) by how IPRs legislations are devised in industrialized countries (e.g. the Bayh-Dole Act in the US) and (ii) by a sharp increasing of international patent litigation in this field. Some possible solutions to the above problem and recommendations are finally provided.

AB - The article first highlights the poor results obtained by the 2009 Copenhagen Conference with reference to Environmentally Sound Technologies (ESTs), particularly climate technologies. It stresses that in the Copenhagen Accord there is no specific reference to intellectual property rights (IPRs) as a necessary tool to stimulate the transfer of climate technologies, especially to developing countries. The author argues that in certain cases IPRs are capable of obstructing the dissemination across countries of ESTs. This seems to be confirmed (i) by how IPRs legislations are devised in industrialized countries (e.g. the Bayh-Dole Act in the US) and (ii) by a sharp increasing of international patent litigation in this field. Some possible solutions to the above problem and recommendations are finally provided.

U2 - 10.1017/S1867299X00000088

DO - 10.1017/S1867299X00000088

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 72

EP - 76

JO - European Journal of Risk Regulation

T2 - European Journal of Risk Regulation

JF - European Journal of Risk Regulation

SN - 1867-299X

IS - 1

ER -