Combining work and study: a solution?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Anyone dealing regularly with advising students is aware of the conflict between academic and non-academic pursuits, in particular paid employment, that can lead to under-performance and absence frequently followed by withdrawal from the course. Work has been perceived as conflicting with study rather than enhancing the learning experience, unless it is part of a sandwich course.

Current progression rates indicate that some of those withdrawing at first and second year are working part-time and not combining work and study effectively. In order to address this issue it was necessary to devise a structured approach that gave credit to students whilst at work that also enhanced the learning experience. To that end, the Advisor of Studies devised a module to help students structure their personal development for work and study.

The purposes of introducing the module were to:
• Improve students’ performance in examinations and coursework.
• Minimise “drop-out” rates. The design of the programme integrates the skills required for academic study with those developed as a result of employment, voluntary work or vocational training that is not otherwise recognised as a part of the course undertaken.

The module aims to counteract this cause of poor progression by acknowledging and directing the skills and knowledge attained in a non-academic environment. Students who leave with the Diploma in Higher Education and utilised this option are expected to be more likely to return to their studies at a later date.

In conjunction with the assessment strategy adopted it is envisaged that the module will, to a certain extent, address one cause of poor progression.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPROGRESS 1
Subtitle of host publicationStudent progression and retention in engineering: proceedings
EditorsG. Cutler, S. Pulko
Place of PublicationHull
PublisherUniversity of Hull
Pages166-172
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2001
EventProgress 1 - University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
Duration: 18 Oct 200120 Oct 2001

Conference

ConferenceProgress 1
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityHull
Period18/10/0120/10/01

Fingerprint

student
sandwich course
studies (academic)
cause
vocational education
drop-out
withdrawal
learning
performance
credit
experience
examination
education
time

Cite this

Simpson, E. (2001). Combining work and study: a solution? In G. Cutler, & S. Pulko (Eds.), PROGRESS 1: Student progression and retention in engineering: proceedings (pp. 166-172). Hull: University of Hull.
Simpson, Edward. / Combining work and study : a solution?. PROGRESS 1: Student progression and retention in engineering: proceedings. editor / G. Cutler ; S. Pulko. Hull : University of Hull, 2001. pp. 166-172
@inproceedings{70d0da1432534dd6b133713465ed87dd,
title = "Combining work and study: a solution?",
abstract = "Anyone dealing regularly with advising students is aware of the conflict between academic and non-academic pursuits, in particular paid employment, that can lead to under-performance and absence frequently followed by withdrawal from the course. Work has been perceived as conflicting with study rather than enhancing the learning experience, unless it is part of a sandwich course.Current progression rates indicate that some of those withdrawing at first and second year are working part-time and not combining work and study effectively. In order to address this issue it was necessary to devise a structured approach that gave credit to students whilst at work that also enhanced the learning experience. To that end, the Advisor of Studies devised a module to help students structure their personal development for work and study.The purposes of introducing the module were to:• Improve students’ performance in examinations and coursework.• Minimise “drop-out” rates. The design of the programme integrates the skills required for academic study with those developed as a result of employment, voluntary work or vocational training that is not otherwise recognised as a part of the course undertaken.The module aims to counteract this cause of poor progression by acknowledging and directing the skills and knowledge attained in a non-academic environment. Students who leave with the Diploma in Higher Education and utilised this option are expected to be more likely to return to their studies at a later date.In conjunction with the assessment strategy adopted it is envisaged that the module will, to a certain extent, address one cause of poor progression.",
author = "Edward Simpson",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
pages = "166--172",
editor = "G. Cutler and S. Pulko",
booktitle = "PROGRESS 1",
publisher = "University of Hull",

}

Simpson, E 2001, Combining work and study: a solution? in G Cutler & S Pulko (eds), PROGRESS 1: Student progression and retention in engineering: proceedings. University of Hull, Hull, pp. 166-172, Progress 1, Hull, United Kingdom, 18/10/01.

Combining work and study : a solution? / Simpson, Edward.

PROGRESS 1: Student progression and retention in engineering: proceedings. ed. / G. Cutler; S. Pulko. Hull : University of Hull, 2001. p. 166-172.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Combining work and study

T2 - a solution?

AU - Simpson, Edward

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Anyone dealing regularly with advising students is aware of the conflict between academic and non-academic pursuits, in particular paid employment, that can lead to under-performance and absence frequently followed by withdrawal from the course. Work has been perceived as conflicting with study rather than enhancing the learning experience, unless it is part of a sandwich course.Current progression rates indicate that some of those withdrawing at first and second year are working part-time and not combining work and study effectively. In order to address this issue it was necessary to devise a structured approach that gave credit to students whilst at work that also enhanced the learning experience. To that end, the Advisor of Studies devised a module to help students structure their personal development for work and study.The purposes of introducing the module were to:• Improve students’ performance in examinations and coursework.• Minimise “drop-out” rates. The design of the programme integrates the skills required for academic study with those developed as a result of employment, voluntary work or vocational training that is not otherwise recognised as a part of the course undertaken.The module aims to counteract this cause of poor progression by acknowledging and directing the skills and knowledge attained in a non-academic environment. Students who leave with the Diploma in Higher Education and utilised this option are expected to be more likely to return to their studies at a later date.In conjunction with the assessment strategy adopted it is envisaged that the module will, to a certain extent, address one cause of poor progression.

AB - Anyone dealing regularly with advising students is aware of the conflict between academic and non-academic pursuits, in particular paid employment, that can lead to under-performance and absence frequently followed by withdrawal from the course. Work has been perceived as conflicting with study rather than enhancing the learning experience, unless it is part of a sandwich course.Current progression rates indicate that some of those withdrawing at first and second year are working part-time and not combining work and study effectively. In order to address this issue it was necessary to devise a structured approach that gave credit to students whilst at work that also enhanced the learning experience. To that end, the Advisor of Studies devised a module to help students structure their personal development for work and study.The purposes of introducing the module were to:• Improve students’ performance in examinations and coursework.• Minimise “drop-out” rates. The design of the programme integrates the skills required for academic study with those developed as a result of employment, voluntary work or vocational training that is not otherwise recognised as a part of the course undertaken.The module aims to counteract this cause of poor progression by acknowledging and directing the skills and knowledge attained in a non-academic environment. Students who leave with the Diploma in Higher Education and utilised this option are expected to be more likely to return to their studies at a later date.In conjunction with the assessment strategy adopted it is envisaged that the module will, to a certain extent, address one cause of poor progression.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 166

EP - 172

BT - PROGRESS 1

A2 - Cutler, G.

A2 - Pulko, S.

PB - University of Hull

CY - Hull

ER -

Simpson E. Combining work and study: a solution? In Cutler G, Pulko S, editors, PROGRESS 1: Student progression and retention in engineering: proceedings. Hull: University of Hull. 2001. p. 166-172