Comparative testing of PMF and CFA models

Y. Qin, Kehinde O. K. Oduyemi, L. Y. Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 41 Citations

Abstract

Positive matrix factorization (PMF) and convenient factor analysis (CFA) models have been tested using a large aerosol database measured in Hong Kong. As many as possible chemical components (good elements or so-called weak elements) [Atmos. Environ. 33 (1999) 2169] were selected to compose as large as possible a database. Error estimates and enforced rotation techniques were used in the PMF model trial. These important aspects were not included in a recently published work [Atmos. Environ. 33 (1999) 2169]. The test results of the two models mentioned above were assessed qualitatively by analyzing factor characteristics, and quantitatively by comparing factor mass profiles. CFA model has been shown to be a convenient tool for aerosol source identification and can qualitatively treat the elements that can serve as source tracers as well as PMF model does. PMF model provides expert tool for the identification of aerosol sources and source contribution estimation. It can treat the chemical components from various sources by apportioning these chemical components among the factors more reasonably than CFA model can. Quantitatively, the factor mass profiles produced by a PMF model are better at describing the source structure than those derived by a CFA model.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-87
Number of pages12
JournalChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
Volume61
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2002

Fingerprint

Anthralin
Enzyme Reactivators
Factorization
Syndactyly
Factor analysis
Aerosols
Alcuronium
Blood Stains
Apamin
Elbow Joint
Chemical elements
Identification (control systems)
Testing

Cite this

Qin, Y.; Oduyemi, Kehinde O. K.; Chan, L. Y. / Comparative testing of PMF and CFA models.

In: Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 61, No. 1-2, 02.2002, p. 75-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17312f3efe6d4d2fbf980a66cb481d28,
title = "Comparative testing of PMF and CFA models",
abstract = "Positive matrix factorization (PMF) and convenient factor analysis (CFA) models have been tested using a large aerosol database measured in Hong Kong. As many as possible chemical components (good elements or so-called weak elements) [Atmos. Environ. 33 (1999) 2169] were selected to compose as large as possible a database. Error estimates and enforced rotation techniques were used in the PMF model trial. These important aspects were not included in a recently published work [Atmos. Environ. 33 (1999) 2169]. The test results of the two models mentioned above were assessed qualitatively by analyzing factor characteristics, and quantitatively by comparing factor mass profiles. CFA model has been shown to be a convenient tool for aerosol source identification and can qualitatively treat the elements that can serve as source tracers as well as PMF model does. PMF model provides expert tool for the identification of aerosol sources and source contribution estimation. It can treat the chemical components from various sources by apportioning these chemical components among the factors more reasonably than CFA model can. Quantitatively, the factor mass profiles produced by a PMF model are better at describing the source structure than those derived by a CFA model.",
author = "Y. Qin and Oduyemi, {Kehinde O. K.} and Chan, {L. Y.}",
year = "2002",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00175-7",
volume = "61",
pages = "75--87",
journal = "Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems",
issn = "0169-7439",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

Comparative testing of PMF and CFA models. / Qin, Y.; Oduyemi, Kehinde O. K.; Chan, L. Y.

In: Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 61, No. 1-2, 02.2002, p. 75-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative testing of PMF and CFA models

AU - Qin,Y.

AU - Oduyemi,Kehinde O. K.

AU - Chan,L. Y.

PY - 2002/2

Y1 - 2002/2

N2 - Positive matrix factorization (PMF) and convenient factor analysis (CFA) models have been tested using a large aerosol database measured in Hong Kong. As many as possible chemical components (good elements or so-called weak elements) [Atmos. Environ. 33 (1999) 2169] were selected to compose as large as possible a database. Error estimates and enforced rotation techniques were used in the PMF model trial. These important aspects were not included in a recently published work [Atmos. Environ. 33 (1999) 2169]. The test results of the two models mentioned above were assessed qualitatively by analyzing factor characteristics, and quantitatively by comparing factor mass profiles. CFA model has been shown to be a convenient tool for aerosol source identification and can qualitatively treat the elements that can serve as source tracers as well as PMF model does. PMF model provides expert tool for the identification of aerosol sources and source contribution estimation. It can treat the chemical components from various sources by apportioning these chemical components among the factors more reasonably than CFA model can. Quantitatively, the factor mass profiles produced by a PMF model are better at describing the source structure than those derived by a CFA model.

AB - Positive matrix factorization (PMF) and convenient factor analysis (CFA) models have been tested using a large aerosol database measured in Hong Kong. As many as possible chemical components (good elements or so-called weak elements) [Atmos. Environ. 33 (1999) 2169] were selected to compose as large as possible a database. Error estimates and enforced rotation techniques were used in the PMF model trial. These important aspects were not included in a recently published work [Atmos. Environ. 33 (1999) 2169]. The test results of the two models mentioned above were assessed qualitatively by analyzing factor characteristics, and quantitatively by comparing factor mass profiles. CFA model has been shown to be a convenient tool for aerosol source identification and can qualitatively treat the elements that can serve as source tracers as well as PMF model does. PMF model provides expert tool for the identification of aerosol sources and source contribution estimation. It can treat the chemical components from various sources by apportioning these chemical components among the factors more reasonably than CFA model can. Quantitatively, the factor mass profiles produced by a PMF model are better at describing the source structure than those derived by a CFA model.

U2 - 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00175-7

DO - 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00175-7

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 75

EP - 87

JO - Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

T2 - Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

JF - Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

SN - 0169-7439

IS - 1-2

ER -