Abstract
This paper describes a study which was carried out to evaluate the performance of two types of small sewage-treatment plant which are commonly available in the UK, i.e. a rotating biological contactor and a sequencing batch reactor. Both systems produced an effluent quality of less than 20 mg/l BOD and 30 mg/l SS; however, the sequencing batch reactor was more consistent in producing a better effluent (i.e. BOD<10 mg/l and SS<20 mg/l) than the rotating biological contactor. The sequencing batch reactor also demonstrated a greater tendency to remove nutrients, although the special design features which were used in this study were believed to have enhanced the rate of nutrient removal.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 147-151 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Water and Environment Journal |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2001 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- Hydraulic surge
- Organic shockload
- Rotating biological contactor
- Sequencing batch reactor
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of RBC and SBR systems for the treatment of sewage from small communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver