Concessionary nature of public–private partnerships in Russia and Kazakhstan: a critical review

Nikolai Mouraviev, Nada K. Kakabadse, Isabella Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides a critical overview of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Russia and Kazakhstan and examines the rationale underpinning such partnerships. The analysis discusses the reasons why governments in Russia and Kazakhstan focus principally on concessions as a form of PPP and goes on to provide a critical assessment of the key approaches and situational factors relating to concessions in these two countries.

The article finds that external globalization impulses pressed Russia and Kazakhstan to align their policies and institutions with western orthodoxy and perceived international best practice. An ever-increasing emphasis on use of PPPs has been a key feature of this alignment. However, the governments of Russia and Kazakhstan have increasingly resorted to concessions as progress with the development and implementation of Western style PPP models has stalled. This article concludes that the governments of Russia and Kazakhstan have demonstrated an overly optimistic approach to PPP and as a result may have substantially understated their overall concessional risks and costs. Features of Russian and Kazakhstani PPP arrangements such as ambiguity in output specification and extensive reliance on government subsidies, combined with lack of expertise of private partners, may significantly decrease concession benefits.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)410-420
JournalInternational Journal of Public Administration
Volume35
Issue number6
Early online date2 May 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Kazakhstan
public private partnership
Russia
concession
government subsidies
best practice
Public-private partnerships
expertise
globalization
Concession
lack
costs
Government

Cite this

@article{0c31a784772745c4b5ba0150b20036b6,
title = "Concessionary nature of public–private partnerships in Russia and Kazakhstan:: a critical review",
abstract = "This article provides a critical overview of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Russia and Kazakhstan and examines the rationale underpinning such partnerships. The analysis discusses the reasons why governments in Russia and Kazakhstan focus principally on concessions as a form of PPP and goes on to provide a critical assessment of the key approaches and situational factors relating to concessions in these two countries.The article finds that external globalization impulses pressed Russia and Kazakhstan to align their policies and institutions with western orthodoxy and perceived international best practice. An ever-increasing emphasis on use of PPPs has been a key feature of this alignment. However, the governments of Russia and Kazakhstan have increasingly resorted to concessions as progress with the development and implementation of Western style PPP models has stalled. This article concludes that the governments of Russia and Kazakhstan have demonstrated an overly optimistic approach to PPP and as a result may have substantially understated their overall concessional risks and costs. Features of Russian and Kazakhstani PPP arrangements such as ambiguity in output specification and extensive reliance on government subsidies, combined with lack of expertise of private partners, may significantly decrease concession benefits.",
author = "Nikolai Mouraviev and Kakabadse, {Nada K.} and Isabella Robinson",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/01900692.2012.658000",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "410--420",
journal = "International Journal of Public Administration",
issn = "0190-0692",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

Concessionary nature of public–private partnerships in Russia and Kazakhstan: a critical review. / Mouraviev, Nikolai; Kakabadse, Nada K.; Robinson, Isabella.

In: International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2012, p. 410-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concessionary nature of public–private partnerships in Russia and Kazakhstan:

T2 - a critical review

AU - Mouraviev, Nikolai

AU - Kakabadse, Nada K.

AU - Robinson, Isabella

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This article provides a critical overview of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Russia and Kazakhstan and examines the rationale underpinning such partnerships. The analysis discusses the reasons why governments in Russia and Kazakhstan focus principally on concessions as a form of PPP and goes on to provide a critical assessment of the key approaches and situational factors relating to concessions in these two countries.The article finds that external globalization impulses pressed Russia and Kazakhstan to align their policies and institutions with western orthodoxy and perceived international best practice. An ever-increasing emphasis on use of PPPs has been a key feature of this alignment. However, the governments of Russia and Kazakhstan have increasingly resorted to concessions as progress with the development and implementation of Western style PPP models has stalled. This article concludes that the governments of Russia and Kazakhstan have demonstrated an overly optimistic approach to PPP and as a result may have substantially understated their overall concessional risks and costs. Features of Russian and Kazakhstani PPP arrangements such as ambiguity in output specification and extensive reliance on government subsidies, combined with lack of expertise of private partners, may significantly decrease concession benefits.

AB - This article provides a critical overview of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Russia and Kazakhstan and examines the rationale underpinning such partnerships. The analysis discusses the reasons why governments in Russia and Kazakhstan focus principally on concessions as a form of PPP and goes on to provide a critical assessment of the key approaches and situational factors relating to concessions in these two countries.The article finds that external globalization impulses pressed Russia and Kazakhstan to align their policies and institutions with western orthodoxy and perceived international best practice. An ever-increasing emphasis on use of PPPs has been a key feature of this alignment. However, the governments of Russia and Kazakhstan have increasingly resorted to concessions as progress with the development and implementation of Western style PPP models has stalled. This article concludes that the governments of Russia and Kazakhstan have demonstrated an overly optimistic approach to PPP and as a result may have substantially understated their overall concessional risks and costs. Features of Russian and Kazakhstani PPP arrangements such as ambiguity in output specification and extensive reliance on government subsidies, combined with lack of expertise of private partners, may significantly decrease concession benefits.

U2 - 10.1080/01900692.2012.658000

DO - 10.1080/01900692.2012.658000

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 410

EP - 420

JO - International Journal of Public Administration

JF - International Journal of Public Administration

SN - 0190-0692

IS - 6

ER -