Constituent structure is formulated in one stage

Martin J. Pickering, Holly P. Branigan, Janet F. McLean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In four syntactic priming experiments, participants completed target fragments as “prepositional object” sentences (e.g., “The patient showed his leg to the doctor”) or “double object” sentences (e.g., “The patient showed the doctor his leg”) or used another non-ditransitive form. The syntactic form of a prime sentence affected the form of participants' target completions. Experiments 1 to 3 used written sentence completion. Experiment 1 demonstrated that priming is a two-way process by comparing “prepositional object” and “double object” priming conditions with a baseline condition containing an intransitive verb. Experiments 2 and 3 found that “shifted” primes (e.g., “The racing driver showed to the helpful mechanic the problem with the car”) did not prime the production of “prepositional object” sentences but instead behaved like baseline primes. Experiment 4 found similar results to those of Experiment 3 in spoken sentence production, where participants repeated the prime and then completed it. We interpret the results in terms of accounts that assume that constituent structure is formulated in one stage.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)586-605
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2002

Fingerprint

Leg
experiment
Experiments
Syntactics
mechanic
Experiment
Constituent
Mechanics
Railroad cars
driver
Prepositional Object
Doctors
Priming

Cite this

Pickering, Martin J. ; Branigan, Holly P. ; McLean, Janet F. / Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. In: Journal of Memory and Language. 2002 ; Vol. 46, No. 3. pp. 586-605.
@article{2ba5c82329f44b469f941d89c008afde,
title = "Constituent structure is formulated in one stage",
abstract = "In four syntactic priming experiments, participants completed target fragments as “prepositional object” sentences (e.g., “The patient showed his leg to the doctor”) or “double object” sentences (e.g., “The patient showed the doctor his leg”) or used another non-ditransitive form. The syntactic form of a prime sentence affected the form of participants' target completions. Experiments 1 to 3 used written sentence completion. Experiment 1 demonstrated that priming is a two-way process by comparing “prepositional object” and “double object” priming conditions with a baseline condition containing an intransitive verb. Experiments 2 and 3 found that “shifted” primes (e.g., “The racing driver showed to the helpful mechanic the problem with the car”) did not prime the production of “prepositional object” sentences but instead behaved like baseline primes. Experiment 4 found similar results to those of Experiment 3 in spoken sentence production, where participants repeated the prime and then completed it. We interpret the results in terms of accounts that assume that constituent structure is formulated in one stage.",
author = "Pickering, {Martin J.} and Branigan, {Holly P.} and McLean, {Janet F.}",
year = "2002",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1006/jmla.2001.2824",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "586--605",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. / Pickering, Martin J.; Branigan, Holly P.; McLean, Janet F.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 46, No. 3, 15.04.2002, p. 586-605.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constituent structure is formulated in one stage

AU - Pickering, Martin J.

AU - Branigan, Holly P.

AU - McLean, Janet F.

PY - 2002/4/15

Y1 - 2002/4/15

N2 - In four syntactic priming experiments, participants completed target fragments as “prepositional object” sentences (e.g., “The patient showed his leg to the doctor”) or “double object” sentences (e.g., “The patient showed the doctor his leg”) or used another non-ditransitive form. The syntactic form of a prime sentence affected the form of participants' target completions. Experiments 1 to 3 used written sentence completion. Experiment 1 demonstrated that priming is a two-way process by comparing “prepositional object” and “double object” priming conditions with a baseline condition containing an intransitive verb. Experiments 2 and 3 found that “shifted” primes (e.g., “The racing driver showed to the helpful mechanic the problem with the car”) did not prime the production of “prepositional object” sentences but instead behaved like baseline primes. Experiment 4 found similar results to those of Experiment 3 in spoken sentence production, where participants repeated the prime and then completed it. We interpret the results in terms of accounts that assume that constituent structure is formulated in one stage.

AB - In four syntactic priming experiments, participants completed target fragments as “prepositional object” sentences (e.g., “The patient showed his leg to the doctor”) or “double object” sentences (e.g., “The patient showed the doctor his leg”) or used another non-ditransitive form. The syntactic form of a prime sentence affected the form of participants' target completions. Experiments 1 to 3 used written sentence completion. Experiment 1 demonstrated that priming is a two-way process by comparing “prepositional object” and “double object” priming conditions with a baseline condition containing an intransitive verb. Experiments 2 and 3 found that “shifted” primes (e.g., “The racing driver showed to the helpful mechanic the problem with the car”) did not prime the production of “prepositional object” sentences but instead behaved like baseline primes. Experiment 4 found similar results to those of Experiment 3 in spoken sentence production, where participants repeated the prime and then completed it. We interpret the results in terms of accounts that assume that constituent structure is formulated in one stage.

U2 - 10.1006/jmla.2001.2824

DO - 10.1006/jmla.2001.2824

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 586

EP - 605

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 3

ER -