Constructivism, constitutionalism and the EU's area of freedom security and justice post-Lisbon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    148 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This essay addresses the fundamental conceptual challenges which face the development of the Area of Freedom Security and Justice (AFSJ) in the post-Lisbon Treaty era. It argues that Onuf style constructivism is a valid lens with which to examine the development of the AFSJ to date, involving as it does the development of a shared understanding by practitioners, predominantly law enforcement and prosecution professionals, within the structures provided for them, in order to develop a completely new area of law and practice. While this approach will continue to need to be deployed in the development of further new operational areas, such as cybercrime, a new approach is now required, that of constitutionalism. A variety of forms of constitutionalism are then examined in order to establish their suitability as a mode of analysis for these developments.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)412-423
    Number of pages12
    JournalEuropean Law Review
    Volume41
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2016

    Keywords

    • Area of Freedom Security and Justice
    • Constitutional law
    • Cybercrime
    • EU law
    • Jurisprudence
    • Law enforcement

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Constructivism, constitutionalism and the EU's area of freedom security and justice post-Lisbon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this