Contesting the new irrational actor model: a case study of mobile phone mast protest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 10 Citations

Abstract

Public opposition to the siting of telecommunications masts tends to focus on perceived health risks, yet scientific evidence suggests that mobile handsets may constitute more of a risk. This paradox is usually explained in terms of cognitive or communication deficit models that contain an implicit thesis of protest actor irrationality. Recent authors (e.g. Burgess, 2002, 2004;Taverne, 2005) have, however, been more explicit in arguing that such protests are an irrational reaction to media constructed fears and state mismanagement of techno-infrastructure modernization. Together these approaches form what we call the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’. Drawing on insights from social movements theory and data from a 12-month case study of the campaign against Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) telecommunications masts in north-east Fife, we argue that contrary to the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’, the anti-mast protesters utilize multi-form modes of substantive and instrumental rational action.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-456
Number of pages18
JournalSociology
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

model
protest
telecommunication
case study
cell phone
health risk
modernization
radio
deficit
opposition
campaign
infrastructure
reaction
anxiety
media
action
risk
theory
data

Cite this

Law, Alex; McNeish, Wallace / Contesting the new irrational actor model : a case study of mobile phone mast protest.

In: Sociology, Vol. 41, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 439-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2874831544ef454292818106710383d4,
title = "Contesting the new irrational actor model: a case study of mobile phone mast protest",
abstract = "Public opposition to the siting of telecommunications masts tends to focus on perceived health risks, yet scientific evidence suggests that mobile handsets may constitute more of a risk. This paradox is usually explained in terms of cognitive or communication deficit models that contain an implicit thesis of protest actor irrationality. Recent authors (e.g. Burgess, 2002, 2004;Taverne, 2005) have, however, been more explicit in arguing that such protests are an irrational reaction to media constructed fears and state mismanagement of techno-infrastructure modernization. Together these approaches form what we call the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’. Drawing on insights from social movements theory and data from a 12-month case study of the campaign against Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) telecommunications masts in north-east Fife, we argue that contrary to the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’, the anti-mast protesters utilize multi-form modes of substantive and instrumental rational action.",
author = "Alex Law and Wallace McNeish",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0038038507076616",
volume = "41",
pages = "439--456",
journal = "Sociology",
number = "3",

}

Contesting the new irrational actor model : a case study of mobile phone mast protest. / Law, Alex; McNeish, Wallace.

In: Sociology, Vol. 41, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 439-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contesting the new irrational actor model

T2 - Sociology

AU - Law,Alex

AU - McNeish,Wallace

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Public opposition to the siting of telecommunications masts tends to focus on perceived health risks, yet scientific evidence suggests that mobile handsets may constitute more of a risk. This paradox is usually explained in terms of cognitive or communication deficit models that contain an implicit thesis of protest actor irrationality. Recent authors (e.g. Burgess, 2002, 2004;Taverne, 2005) have, however, been more explicit in arguing that such protests are an irrational reaction to media constructed fears and state mismanagement of techno-infrastructure modernization. Together these approaches form what we call the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’. Drawing on insights from social movements theory and data from a 12-month case study of the campaign against Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) telecommunications masts in north-east Fife, we argue that contrary to the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’, the anti-mast protesters utilize multi-form modes of substantive and instrumental rational action.

AB - Public opposition to the siting of telecommunications masts tends to focus on perceived health risks, yet scientific evidence suggests that mobile handsets may constitute more of a risk. This paradox is usually explained in terms of cognitive or communication deficit models that contain an implicit thesis of protest actor irrationality. Recent authors (e.g. Burgess, 2002, 2004;Taverne, 2005) have, however, been more explicit in arguing that such protests are an irrational reaction to media constructed fears and state mismanagement of techno-infrastructure modernization. Together these approaches form what we call the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’. Drawing on insights from social movements theory and data from a 12-month case study of the campaign against Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) telecommunications masts in north-east Fife, we argue that contrary to the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’, the anti-mast protesters utilize multi-form modes of substantive and instrumental rational action.

U2 - 10.1177/0038038507076616

DO - 10.1177/0038038507076616

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 439

EP - 456

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

IS - 3

ER -