Contesting the new irrational actor model: a case study of mobile phone mast protest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public opposition to the siting of telecommunications masts tends to focus on perceived health risks, yet scientific evidence suggests that mobile handsets may constitute more of a risk. This paradox is usually explained in terms of cognitive or communication deficit models that contain an implicit thesis of protest actor irrationality. Recent authors (e.g. Burgess, 2002, 2004;Taverne, 2005) have, however, been more explicit in arguing that such protests are an irrational reaction to media constructed fears and state mismanagement of techno-infrastructure modernization. Together these approaches form what we call the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’. Drawing on insights from social movements theory and data from a 12-month case study of the campaign against Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) telecommunications masts in north-east Fife, we argue that contrary to the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’, the anti-mast protesters utilize multi-form modes of substantive and instrumental rational action.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-456
Number of pages18
JournalSociology
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

protest
telecommunication
health risk
Social Movements
modernization
radio
deficit
opposition
campaign
infrastructure
anxiety
communication
evidence

Cite this

@article{2874831544ef454292818106710383d4,
title = "Contesting the new irrational actor model: a case study of mobile phone mast protest",
abstract = "Public opposition to the siting of telecommunications masts tends to focus on perceived health risks, yet scientific evidence suggests that mobile handsets may constitute more of a risk. This paradox is usually explained in terms of cognitive or communication deficit models that contain an implicit thesis of protest actor irrationality. Recent authors (e.g. Burgess, 2002, 2004;Taverne, 2005) have, however, been more explicit in arguing that such protests are an irrational reaction to media constructed fears and state mismanagement of techno-infrastructure modernization. Together these approaches form what we call the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’. Drawing on insights from social movements theory and data from a 12-month case study of the campaign against Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) telecommunications masts in north-east Fife, we argue that contrary to the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’, the anti-mast protesters utilize multi-form modes of substantive and instrumental rational action.",
author = "Alex Law and Wallace McNeish",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0038038507076616",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "439--456",
journal = "Sociology",
number = "3",

}

Contesting the new irrational actor model : a case study of mobile phone mast protest. / Law, Alex; McNeish, Wallace.

In: Sociology, Vol. 41, No. 3, 06.2007, p. 439-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contesting the new irrational actor model

T2 - a case study of mobile phone mast protest

AU - Law, Alex

AU - McNeish, Wallace

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Public opposition to the siting of telecommunications masts tends to focus on perceived health risks, yet scientific evidence suggests that mobile handsets may constitute more of a risk. This paradox is usually explained in terms of cognitive or communication deficit models that contain an implicit thesis of protest actor irrationality. Recent authors (e.g. Burgess, 2002, 2004;Taverne, 2005) have, however, been more explicit in arguing that such protests are an irrational reaction to media constructed fears and state mismanagement of techno-infrastructure modernization. Together these approaches form what we call the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’. Drawing on insights from social movements theory and data from a 12-month case study of the campaign against Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) telecommunications masts in north-east Fife, we argue that contrary to the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’, the anti-mast protesters utilize multi-form modes of substantive and instrumental rational action.

AB - Public opposition to the siting of telecommunications masts tends to focus on perceived health risks, yet scientific evidence suggests that mobile handsets may constitute more of a risk. This paradox is usually explained in terms of cognitive or communication deficit models that contain an implicit thesis of protest actor irrationality. Recent authors (e.g. Burgess, 2002, 2004;Taverne, 2005) have, however, been more explicit in arguing that such protests are an irrational reaction to media constructed fears and state mismanagement of techno-infrastructure modernization. Together these approaches form what we call the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’. Drawing on insights from social movements theory and data from a 12-month case study of the campaign against Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) telecommunications masts in north-east Fife, we argue that contrary to the ‘New Irrational Actor Model’, the anti-mast protesters utilize multi-form modes of substantive and instrumental rational action.

U2 - 10.1177/0038038507076616

DO - 10.1177/0038038507076616

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 439

EP - 456

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

IS - 3

ER -