Contrast discrimination, non-uniform patterns and change blindness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 21 Citations

Abstract

Change blindness–our inability to detect large changes in natural scenes when saccades, blinks and other transients interrupt visual input–seems to contradict psychophysical evidence for our exquisite sensitivity to contrast changes. Can the type of effects described as ‘change blindness’ be observed with simple, multi–element stimuli, amenable to psychophysical analysis? Such stimuli, composed of five mixed contrast elements, elicited a striking increase in contrast increment thresholds compared to those for an isolated element. Cue presentation prior to the stimulus substantially reduced thresholds, as for change blindness with natural scenes. On one hand, explanations for change blindness based on abstract and sketchy representations in short–term visual memory seem inappropriate for this low–level image property of contrast where there is ample evidence for exquisite performance on memory tasks. On the other hand, the highly increased thresholds for mixed contrast elements, and the decreased thresholds when a cue is present, argue against any simple early attentional or sensory explanation for change blindness. Thus, psychophysical results for very simple patterns cannot straightforwardly predict results even for the slightly more complicated patterns studied here.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2159-2166
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume265
Issue number1411
DOIs
StatePublished - 22 Nov 1998

Fingerprint

Blindness
Discrimination (Psychology)
Cues
Contrast Sensitivity
Saccades
Short-Term Memory

Cite this

Scott-Brown, Kenneth C.; Orbach, H. S. / Contrast discrimination, non-uniform patterns and change blindness.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 265, No. 1411, 22.11.1998, p. 2159-2166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fe31acc930af4cd4a6c918b680134fc3,
title = "Contrast discrimination, non-uniform patterns and change blindness",
abstract = "Change blindness–our inability to detect large changes in natural scenes when saccades, blinks and other transients interrupt visual input–seems to contradict psychophysical evidence for our exquisite sensitivity to contrast changes. Can the type of effects described as ‘change blindness’ be observed with simple, multi–element stimuli, amenable to psychophysical analysis? Such stimuli, composed of five mixed contrast elements, elicited a striking increase in contrast increment thresholds compared to those for an isolated element. Cue presentation prior to the stimulus substantially reduced thresholds, as for change blindness with natural scenes. On one hand, explanations for change blindness based on abstract and sketchy representations in short–term visual memory seem inappropriate for this low–level image property of contrast where there is ample evidence for exquisite performance on memory tasks. On the other hand, the highly increased thresholds for mixed contrast elements, and the decreased thresholds when a cue is present, argue against any simple early attentional or sensory explanation for change blindness. Thus, psychophysical results for very simple patterns cannot straightforwardly predict results even for the slightly more complicated patterns studied here.",
author = "Scott-Brown, {Kenneth C.} and Orbach, {H. S.}",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1098/rspb.1998.0553",
volume = "265",
pages = "2159--2166",
journal = "Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8452",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "1411",

}

Contrast discrimination, non-uniform patterns and change blindness. / Scott-Brown, Kenneth C.; Orbach, H. S.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 265, No. 1411, 22.11.1998, p. 2159-2166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrast discrimination, non-uniform patterns and change blindness

AU - Scott-Brown,Kenneth C.

AU - Orbach,H. S.

PY - 1998/11/22

Y1 - 1998/11/22

N2 - Change blindness–our inability to detect large changes in natural scenes when saccades, blinks and other transients interrupt visual input–seems to contradict psychophysical evidence for our exquisite sensitivity to contrast changes. Can the type of effects described as ‘change blindness’ be observed with simple, multi–element stimuli, amenable to psychophysical analysis? Such stimuli, composed of five mixed contrast elements, elicited a striking increase in contrast increment thresholds compared to those for an isolated element. Cue presentation prior to the stimulus substantially reduced thresholds, as for change blindness with natural scenes. On one hand, explanations for change blindness based on abstract and sketchy representations in short–term visual memory seem inappropriate for this low–level image property of contrast where there is ample evidence for exquisite performance on memory tasks. On the other hand, the highly increased thresholds for mixed contrast elements, and the decreased thresholds when a cue is present, argue against any simple early attentional or sensory explanation for change blindness. Thus, psychophysical results for very simple patterns cannot straightforwardly predict results even for the slightly more complicated patterns studied here.

AB - Change blindness–our inability to detect large changes in natural scenes when saccades, blinks and other transients interrupt visual input–seems to contradict psychophysical evidence for our exquisite sensitivity to contrast changes. Can the type of effects described as ‘change blindness’ be observed with simple, multi–element stimuli, amenable to psychophysical analysis? Such stimuli, composed of five mixed contrast elements, elicited a striking increase in contrast increment thresholds compared to those for an isolated element. Cue presentation prior to the stimulus substantially reduced thresholds, as for change blindness with natural scenes. On one hand, explanations for change blindness based on abstract and sketchy representations in short–term visual memory seem inappropriate for this low–level image property of contrast where there is ample evidence for exquisite performance on memory tasks. On the other hand, the highly increased thresholds for mixed contrast elements, and the decreased thresholds when a cue is present, argue against any simple early attentional or sensory explanation for change blindness. Thus, psychophysical results for very simple patterns cannot straightforwardly predict results even for the slightly more complicated patterns studied here.

U2 - 10.1098/rspb.1998.0553

DO - 10.1098/rspb.1998.0553

M3 - Article

VL - 265

SP - 2159

EP - 2166

JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

T2 - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8452

IS - 1411

ER -