Countershading camouflage: exploiting photons to break shape-from-shading inference

Olivier Penacchio, P. George Lovell, Graeme D. Ruxton, Innes C. Cuthill, Julie M. Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Animal camouflage is a paradigmatic example of evolution by natural selection, and can only be understood in terms of adaptation to deceive the brains of potential predators and to the environment. Counter-shading is a very common pattern of coloration in the animal kingdom. Countershaded animals are darker on the side that faces a greater light intensity (typically, the back) and have a lighter opposite face. This pattern counterbalances shadowing and may make the animal harder to see against its background, or potentially modifies its perceived shape. Here we model the interaction of light and body shape to predict what the coloration of an animal should be to deceive a predator that has evolved the ability to detect shape from shading. We assess to what extent optimal patterns for crypsis depend on both light distribution and body orientation. We unveil the logical link between matching the background and reducing shape cues.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471
Number of pages1
Journali-Perception
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Camouflage
Photons
Animals
Light
Aptitude
Genetic Selection
Cues
Brain

Cite this

Penacchio, Olivier ; Lovell, P. George ; Ruxton, Graeme D. ; Cuthill, Innes C. ; Harris, Julie M. / Countershading camouflage: exploiting photons to break shape-from-shading inference. In: i-Perception. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. 5. pp. 471.
@article{c3682c1a683b4edfae4417240ad36662,
title = "Countershading camouflage: exploiting photons to break shape-from-shading inference",
abstract = "Animal camouflage is a paradigmatic example of evolution by natural selection, and can only be understood in terms of adaptation to deceive the brains of potential predators and to the environment. Counter-shading is a very common pattern of coloration in the animal kingdom. Countershaded animals are darker on the side that faces a greater light intensity (typically, the back) and have a lighter opposite face. This pattern counterbalances shadowing and may make the animal harder to see against its background, or potentially modifies its perceived shape. Here we model the interaction of light and body shape to predict what the coloration of an animal should be to deceive a predator that has evolved the ability to detect shape from shading. We assess to what extent optimal patterns for crypsis depend on both light distribution and body orientation. We unveil the logical link between matching the background and reducing shape cues.",
author = "Olivier Penacchio and Lovell, {P. George} and Ruxton, {Graeme D.} and Cuthill, {Innes C.} and Harris, {Julie M.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1068/ii40",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "471",
journal = "i-Perception",
issn = "2041-6695",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Countershading camouflage: exploiting photons to break shape-from-shading inference. / Penacchio, Olivier; Lovell, P. George; Ruxton, Graeme D.; Cuthill, Innes C.; Harris, Julie M.

In: i-Perception, Vol. 5, No. 5, 2014, p. 471.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Countershading camouflage: exploiting photons to break shape-from-shading inference

AU - Penacchio, Olivier

AU - Lovell, P. George

AU - Ruxton, Graeme D.

AU - Cuthill, Innes C.

AU - Harris, Julie M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Animal camouflage is a paradigmatic example of evolution by natural selection, and can only be understood in terms of adaptation to deceive the brains of potential predators and to the environment. Counter-shading is a very common pattern of coloration in the animal kingdom. Countershaded animals are darker on the side that faces a greater light intensity (typically, the back) and have a lighter opposite face. This pattern counterbalances shadowing and may make the animal harder to see against its background, or potentially modifies its perceived shape. Here we model the interaction of light and body shape to predict what the coloration of an animal should be to deceive a predator that has evolved the ability to detect shape from shading. We assess to what extent optimal patterns for crypsis depend on both light distribution and body orientation. We unveil the logical link between matching the background and reducing shape cues.

AB - Animal camouflage is a paradigmatic example of evolution by natural selection, and can only be understood in terms of adaptation to deceive the brains of potential predators and to the environment. Counter-shading is a very common pattern of coloration in the animal kingdom. Countershaded animals are darker on the side that faces a greater light intensity (typically, the back) and have a lighter opposite face. This pattern counterbalances shadowing and may make the animal harder to see against its background, or potentially modifies its perceived shape. Here we model the interaction of light and body shape to predict what the coloration of an animal should be to deceive a predator that has evolved the ability to detect shape from shading. We assess to what extent optimal patterns for crypsis depend on both light distribution and body orientation. We unveil the logical link between matching the background and reducing shape cues.

U2 - 10.1068/ii40

DO - 10.1068/ii40

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 471

JO - i-Perception

JF - i-Perception

SN - 2041-6695

IS - 5

ER -