Cue combination of conflicting color and luminance edges

Rebecca Sharman, Paul V. McGraw, Jonathan W. Peirce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abrupt changes in the color or luminance of a visual image potentially indicate object boundaries. Here, we consider how these cues to the visual “edge” location are combined when they conflict. We measured the extent to which localization of a compound edge can be predicted from a simple maximum likelihood estimation model using the reliability of chromatic (L−M) and luminance signals alone. Maximum likelihood estimation accurately predicted the pattern of results across a range of contrasts. Predictions consistently overestimated the relative influence of the luminance cue; although L−M is often considered a poor cue for localization, it was used more than expected. This need not indicate that the visual system is suboptimal but that its priors about which cue is more useful are not flat. This may be because, although strong changes in chromaticity typically represent object boundaries, changes in luminance can be caused by either a boundary or a shadow.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages9
Journali-Perception
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Dec 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cues
Luminance
Color
Maximum likelihood estimation

Cite this

Sharman, Rebecca ; McGraw, Paul V. ; Peirce, Jonathan W. / Cue combination of conflicting color and luminance edges. In: i-Perception. 2015 ; Vol. 6, No. 6.
@article{ca513e4bcd04411e9b68fad829c2c6f6,
title = "Cue combination of conflicting color and luminance edges",
abstract = "Abrupt changes in the color or luminance of a visual image potentially indicate object boundaries. Here, we consider how these cues to the visual “edge” location are combined when they conflict. We measured the extent to which localization of a compound edge can be predicted from a simple maximum likelihood estimation model using the reliability of chromatic (L−M) and luminance signals alone. Maximum likelihood estimation accurately predicted the pattern of results across a range of contrasts. Predictions consistently overestimated the relative influence of the luminance cue; although L−M is often considered a poor cue for localization, it was used more than expected. This need not indicate that the visual system is suboptimal but that its priors about which cue is more useful are not flat. This may be because, although strong changes in chromaticity typically represent object boundaries, changes in luminance can be caused by either a boundary or a shadow.",
author = "Rebecca Sharman and McGraw, {Paul V.} and Peirce, {Jonathan W.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1177/2041669515621215",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "i-Perception",
issn = "2041-6695",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

Cue combination of conflicting color and luminance edges. / Sharman, Rebecca; McGraw, Paul V.; Peirce, Jonathan W.

In: i-Perception, Vol. 6, No. 6, 28.12.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cue combination of conflicting color and luminance edges

AU - Sharman, Rebecca

AU - McGraw, Paul V.

AU - Peirce, Jonathan W.

PY - 2015/12/28

Y1 - 2015/12/28

N2 - Abrupt changes in the color or luminance of a visual image potentially indicate object boundaries. Here, we consider how these cues to the visual “edge” location are combined when they conflict. We measured the extent to which localization of a compound edge can be predicted from a simple maximum likelihood estimation model using the reliability of chromatic (L−M) and luminance signals alone. Maximum likelihood estimation accurately predicted the pattern of results across a range of contrasts. Predictions consistently overestimated the relative influence of the luminance cue; although L−M is often considered a poor cue for localization, it was used more than expected. This need not indicate that the visual system is suboptimal but that its priors about which cue is more useful are not flat. This may be because, although strong changes in chromaticity typically represent object boundaries, changes in luminance can be caused by either a boundary or a shadow.

AB - Abrupt changes in the color or luminance of a visual image potentially indicate object boundaries. Here, we consider how these cues to the visual “edge” location are combined when they conflict. We measured the extent to which localization of a compound edge can be predicted from a simple maximum likelihood estimation model using the reliability of chromatic (L−M) and luminance signals alone. Maximum likelihood estimation accurately predicted the pattern of results across a range of contrasts. Predictions consistently overestimated the relative influence of the luminance cue; although L−M is often considered a poor cue for localization, it was used more than expected. This need not indicate that the visual system is suboptimal but that its priors about which cue is more useful are not flat. This may be because, although strong changes in chromaticity typically represent object boundaries, changes in luminance can be caused by either a boundary or a shadow.

U2 - 10.1177/2041669515621215

DO - 10.1177/2041669515621215

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - i-Perception

JF - i-Perception

SN - 2041-6695

IS - 6

ER -