Cues derived from facial appearance in security-related contexts: a biological and socio-cognitive framework

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    60 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Failures in the security process can have profound costs for both the individual and organizations (e.g., fraud costs the British economy approximately £72 billion; NFA, 2012). A biological and socio-cognitive framework may enhance our understanding of the security process, as the two perspectives collectively acknowledge that (i) competition for resources is/was an important factor in human social behavior and evolution (e.g., Bowles, 2009) and (ii) individuals differ in the ways in which they interpret information given their own traits and circumstances. Both levels of explanation (Mayr, 1963; Tinbergen, 1963) could generate novel hypotheses. For example, proximate-level explanations may clarify how resources are defended and extorted, and the cognitive processes underlying the “chess game” between gatekeepers and “gate crashers.” Ultimate-level explanations may clarify why some individuals are more likely than others to succeed at securing or gaining access to resources and whether certain security-related outcomes can be reliably predicted given specific contexts or ecological conditions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number204
    Number of pages4
    JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
    Volume7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 16 May 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cues derived from facial appearance in security-related contexts: a biological and socio-cognitive framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this