Cultural symbols and landowners’ power: the practice of managing Scotland’s natural resource

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 12 Citations

Abstract

This article deals with the claim that Scottish landowners' power is directly related to their status in law, by arguing that it is, in fact, much more to do with their (inter)relationship with particular cultural symbols that can be associated with the land. However, this presents a sociological problem, for the dominant sociological purchase on land is one which routinely interprets it as a social construction. The paper presented here differs, as it focuses on particular cultural symbols which have a socio-historical resonance in relation to land, and makes the argument that they maintain this presence because of their (inter)connection with particular social groupings, notably landowners. Therefore, it is simply not enough to identify landowners' status in law as the root cause of their power, but instead it should be seen as only one facet of it. I conclude by suggesting that just as important is the way in which landowners have appropriated cultural interpretations of the land to forefront their powers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)691-706
Number of pages16
JournalSociology
Volume34
Issue number4
StatePublished - 16 Nov 2000

Fingerprint

land
power
symbol
interconnection
social construction
grouping
purchase
natural resources
Great Britain
cause
practice
problem

Cite this

Samuel, Andy M. M. / Cultural symbols and landowners’ power : the practice of managing Scotland’s natural resource.

In: Sociology, Vol. 34, No. 4, 16.11.2000, p. 691-706.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64d75cdae9594b61bddfcba83df3a0be,
title = "Cultural symbols and landowners’ power: the practice of managing Scotland’s natural resource",
abstract = "This article deals with the claim that Scottish landowners' power is directly related to their status in law, by arguing that it is, in fact, much more to do with their (inter)relationship with particular cultural symbols that can be associated with the land. However, this presents a sociological problem, for the dominant sociological purchase on land is one which routinely interprets it as a social construction. The paper presented here differs, as it focuses on particular cultural symbols which have a socio-historical resonance in relation to land, and makes the argument that they maintain this presence because of their (inter)connection with particular social groupings, notably landowners. Therefore, it is simply not enough to identify landowners' status in law as the root cause of their power, but instead it should be seen as only one facet of it. I conclude by suggesting that just as important is the way in which landowners have appropriated cultural interpretations of the land to forefront their powers.",
author = "Samuel, {Andy M. M.}",
year = "2000",
month = "11",
volume = "34",
pages = "691--706",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Cultural symbols and landowners’ power : the practice of managing Scotland’s natural resource. / Samuel, Andy M. M.

In: Sociology, Vol. 34, No. 4, 16.11.2000, p. 691-706.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cultural symbols and landowners’ power

T2 - Sociology

AU - Samuel,Andy M. M.

PY - 2000/11/16

Y1 - 2000/11/16

N2 - This article deals with the claim that Scottish landowners' power is directly related to their status in law, by arguing that it is, in fact, much more to do with their (inter)relationship with particular cultural symbols that can be associated with the land. However, this presents a sociological problem, for the dominant sociological purchase on land is one which routinely interprets it as a social construction. The paper presented here differs, as it focuses on particular cultural symbols which have a socio-historical resonance in relation to land, and makes the argument that they maintain this presence because of their (inter)connection with particular social groupings, notably landowners. Therefore, it is simply not enough to identify landowners' status in law as the root cause of their power, but instead it should be seen as only one facet of it. I conclude by suggesting that just as important is the way in which landowners have appropriated cultural interpretations of the land to forefront their powers.

AB - This article deals with the claim that Scottish landowners' power is directly related to their status in law, by arguing that it is, in fact, much more to do with their (inter)relationship with particular cultural symbols that can be associated with the land. However, this presents a sociological problem, for the dominant sociological purchase on land is one which routinely interprets it as a social construction. The paper presented here differs, as it focuses on particular cultural symbols which have a socio-historical resonance in relation to land, and makes the argument that they maintain this presence because of their (inter)connection with particular social groupings, notably landowners. Therefore, it is simply not enough to identify landowners' status in law as the root cause of their power, but instead it should be seen as only one facet of it. I conclude by suggesting that just as important is the way in which landowners have appropriated cultural interpretations of the land to forefront their powers.

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 691

EP - 706

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

IS - 4

ER -