Defining chronic pain for epidemiological research: assessing a subjective definition

Alison M. Purves*, Kay I. Penny, Calum Munro, Blair H. Smith, Jeremy Grimshaw, Brenda Wilson, W. Cairns Smith, W. Alastair Chambers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chronic pain is an important cause of suffering, disability and loss of productivity. Despite this, little research has been done to quantify the problem in the community. This is partly due to the lack of an agreed definition of chronic pain. To address this we undertook a postal survey to test and validate a series of definitions of chronic pain for use in epidemiological research in the community. These definitions were based on duration of symptoms, with a subjective measure of severity in the seeking or taking of treatment for the symptoms. A series of seven definitions of increasing specificity was devised. A random sample of 400 patients was drawn from a general practice in Aberdeen and stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular analgesic drug prescriptions. Patients were surveyed by a self-completion questionnaire consisting of a definitional questionnaire, the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire, the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire and a demographic section. A response rate of 76.3 per cent was obtained. Prevalence of chronic pain ranged from 9.9 to 80.9 per cent depending on the definition applied. Results for the SF-36 showed scores progressively lowering as definitions became more specific. The Chronic Pain Grade showed a similar result. We concluded that our criteria translate to a feasible, valid and acceptable method of defining and identifying chronic pain for research in the community.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-147
Number of pages9
JournalPain Clinic
Volume10
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chronic Pain
Research
Drug Prescriptions
Psychological Stress
General Practice
Analgesics
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Health

Cite this

Purves, A. M., Penny, K. I., Munro, C., Smith, B. H., Grimshaw, J., Wilson, B., ... Chambers, W. A. (1998). Defining chronic pain for epidemiological research: assessing a subjective definition. Pain Clinic, 10(3), 139-147.
Purves, Alison M. ; Penny, Kay I. ; Munro, Calum ; Smith, Blair H. ; Grimshaw, Jeremy ; Wilson, Brenda ; Smith, W. Cairns ; Chambers, W. Alastair. / Defining chronic pain for epidemiological research : assessing a subjective definition. In: Pain Clinic. 1998 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 139-147.
@article{9495cdafe85442b7ba6acb920ee47263,
title = "Defining chronic pain for epidemiological research: assessing a subjective definition",
abstract = "Chronic pain is an important cause of suffering, disability and loss of productivity. Despite this, little research has been done to quantify the problem in the community. This is partly due to the lack of an agreed definition of chronic pain. To address this we undertook a postal survey to test and validate a series of definitions of chronic pain for use in epidemiological research in the community. These definitions were based on duration of symptoms, with a subjective measure of severity in the seeking or taking of treatment for the symptoms. A series of seven definitions of increasing specificity was devised. A random sample of 400 patients was drawn from a general practice in Aberdeen and stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular analgesic drug prescriptions. Patients were surveyed by a self-completion questionnaire consisting of a definitional questionnaire, the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire, the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire and a demographic section. A response rate of 76.3 per cent was obtained. Prevalence of chronic pain ranged from 9.9 to 80.9 per cent depending on the definition applied. Results for the SF-36 showed scores progressively lowering as definitions became more specific. The Chronic Pain Grade showed a similar result. We concluded that our criteria translate to a feasible, valid and acceptable method of defining and identifying chronic pain for research in the community.",
author = "Purves, {Alison M.} and Penny, {Kay I.} and Calum Munro and Smith, {Blair H.} and Jeremy Grimshaw and Brenda Wilson and Smith, {W. Cairns} and Chambers, {W. Alastair}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "139--147",
journal = "Pain Clinic",
issn = "0169-1112",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "3",

}

Purves, AM, Penny, KI, Munro, C, Smith, BH, Grimshaw, J, Wilson, B, Smith, WC & Chambers, WA 1998, 'Defining chronic pain for epidemiological research: assessing a subjective definition', Pain Clinic, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 139-147.

Defining chronic pain for epidemiological research : assessing a subjective definition. / Purves, Alison M.; Penny, Kay I.; Munro, Calum; Smith, Blair H.; Grimshaw, Jeremy; Wilson, Brenda; Smith, W. Cairns; Chambers, W. Alastair.

In: Pain Clinic, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.01.1998, p. 139-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining chronic pain for epidemiological research

T2 - assessing a subjective definition

AU - Purves, Alison M.

AU - Penny, Kay I.

AU - Munro, Calum

AU - Smith, Blair H.

AU - Grimshaw, Jeremy

AU - Wilson, Brenda

AU - Smith, W. Cairns

AU - Chambers, W. Alastair

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Chronic pain is an important cause of suffering, disability and loss of productivity. Despite this, little research has been done to quantify the problem in the community. This is partly due to the lack of an agreed definition of chronic pain. To address this we undertook a postal survey to test and validate a series of definitions of chronic pain for use in epidemiological research in the community. These definitions were based on duration of symptoms, with a subjective measure of severity in the seeking or taking of treatment for the symptoms. A series of seven definitions of increasing specificity was devised. A random sample of 400 patients was drawn from a general practice in Aberdeen and stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular analgesic drug prescriptions. Patients were surveyed by a self-completion questionnaire consisting of a definitional questionnaire, the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire, the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire and a demographic section. A response rate of 76.3 per cent was obtained. Prevalence of chronic pain ranged from 9.9 to 80.9 per cent depending on the definition applied. Results for the SF-36 showed scores progressively lowering as definitions became more specific. The Chronic Pain Grade showed a similar result. We concluded that our criteria translate to a feasible, valid and acceptable method of defining and identifying chronic pain for research in the community.

AB - Chronic pain is an important cause of suffering, disability and loss of productivity. Despite this, little research has been done to quantify the problem in the community. This is partly due to the lack of an agreed definition of chronic pain. To address this we undertook a postal survey to test and validate a series of definitions of chronic pain for use in epidemiological research in the community. These definitions were based on duration of symptoms, with a subjective measure of severity in the seeking or taking of treatment for the symptoms. A series of seven definitions of increasing specificity was devised. A random sample of 400 patients was drawn from a general practice in Aberdeen and stratified for age, gender and receipt or non-receipt of regular analgesic drug prescriptions. Patients were surveyed by a self-completion questionnaire consisting of a definitional questionnaire, the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire, the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire and a demographic section. A response rate of 76.3 per cent was obtained. Prevalence of chronic pain ranged from 9.9 to 80.9 per cent depending on the definition applied. Results for the SF-36 showed scores progressively lowering as definitions became more specific. The Chronic Pain Grade showed a similar result. We concluded that our criteria translate to a feasible, valid and acceptable method of defining and identifying chronic pain for research in the community.

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031957054

VL - 10

SP - 139

EP - 147

JO - Pain Clinic

JF - Pain Clinic

SN - 0169-1112

IS - 3

ER -

Purves AM, Penny KI, Munro C, Smith BH, Grimshaw J, Wilson B et al. Defining chronic pain for epidemiological research: assessing a subjective definition. Pain Clinic. 1998 Jan 1;10(3):139-147.