Distributional effects and individual differences in L2 morphology learning

Patricia J. Brooks, Nicole Kwoka, Vera Kempe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)
26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Second language (L2) learning outcomes may depend on the structure of the input and learners’ cognitive abilities. This study tested whether less predictable input might facilitate learning and generalization of L2 morphology while evaluating contributions of statistical learning ability, nonverbal intelligence, phonological short-term memory, and verbal working memory. Over three sessions, 54 adults were exposed to a Russian case-marking paradigm with a balanced or skewed item distribution in the input. Whereas statistical learning ability and nonverbal intelligence predicted learning of trained items, only nonverbal intelligence also predicted generalization of case-marking inflections to new vocabulary. Neither measure of temporary storage capacity predicted learning. Balanced, less predictable input was associated with higher accuracy in generalization but only in the initial test session. These results suggest that individual differences in pattern extraction play a more sustained role in L2 acquisition than instructional manipulations that vary the predictability of lexical items in the input.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-207
Number of pages37
JournalLanguage Learning
Volume67
Issue number1
Early online date12 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

learning
intelligence
ability
cognitive ability
manipulation
Individual Differences
vocabulary
paradigm
language
Case Marking
Statistical Learning
Inflection
Paradigm
Learning Outcomes
Language
Vocabulary
L2 Learning
Verbal Working Memory
Lexical Item
Manipulation

Cite this

Brooks, Patricia J. ; Kwoka, Nicole ; Kempe, Vera. / Distributional effects and individual differences in L2 morphology learning. In: Language Learning. 2017 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 171-207.
@article{e501ec6c5a574a59b9fce9c03866e786,
title = "Distributional effects and individual differences in L2 morphology learning",
abstract = "Second language (L2) learning outcomes may depend on the structure of the input and learners’ cognitive abilities. This study tested whether less predictable input might facilitate learning and generalization of L2 morphology while evaluating contributions of statistical learning ability, nonverbal intelligence, phonological short-term memory, and verbal working memory. Over three sessions, 54 adults were exposed to a Russian case-marking paradigm with a balanced or skewed item distribution in the input. Whereas statistical learning ability and nonverbal intelligence predicted learning of trained items, only nonverbal intelligence also predicted generalization of case-marking inflections to new vocabulary. Neither measure of temporary storage capacity predicted learning. Balanced, less predictable input was associated with higher accuracy in generalization but only in the initial test session. These results suggest that individual differences in pattern extraction play a more sustained role in L2 acquisition than instructional manipulations that vary the predictability of lexical items in the input.",
author = "Brooks, {Patricia J.} and Nicole Kwoka and Vera Kempe",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1111/lang.12204",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "171--207",
journal = "Language Learning",
issn = "0023-8333",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Distributional effects and individual differences in L2 morphology learning. / Brooks, Patricia J.; Kwoka, Nicole; Kempe, Vera.

In: Language Learning, Vol. 67, No. 1, 16.02.2017, p. 171-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distributional effects and individual differences in L2 morphology learning

AU - Brooks, Patricia J.

AU - Kwoka, Nicole

AU - Kempe, Vera

PY - 2017/2/16

Y1 - 2017/2/16

N2 - Second language (L2) learning outcomes may depend on the structure of the input and learners’ cognitive abilities. This study tested whether less predictable input might facilitate learning and generalization of L2 morphology while evaluating contributions of statistical learning ability, nonverbal intelligence, phonological short-term memory, and verbal working memory. Over three sessions, 54 adults were exposed to a Russian case-marking paradigm with a balanced or skewed item distribution in the input. Whereas statistical learning ability and nonverbal intelligence predicted learning of trained items, only nonverbal intelligence also predicted generalization of case-marking inflections to new vocabulary. Neither measure of temporary storage capacity predicted learning. Balanced, less predictable input was associated with higher accuracy in generalization but only in the initial test session. These results suggest that individual differences in pattern extraction play a more sustained role in L2 acquisition than instructional manipulations that vary the predictability of lexical items in the input.

AB - Second language (L2) learning outcomes may depend on the structure of the input and learners’ cognitive abilities. This study tested whether less predictable input might facilitate learning and generalization of L2 morphology while evaluating contributions of statistical learning ability, nonverbal intelligence, phonological short-term memory, and verbal working memory. Over three sessions, 54 adults were exposed to a Russian case-marking paradigm with a balanced or skewed item distribution in the input. Whereas statistical learning ability and nonverbal intelligence predicted learning of trained items, only nonverbal intelligence also predicted generalization of case-marking inflections to new vocabulary. Neither measure of temporary storage capacity predicted learning. Balanced, less predictable input was associated with higher accuracy in generalization but only in the initial test session. These results suggest that individual differences in pattern extraction play a more sustained role in L2 acquisition than instructional manipulations that vary the predictability of lexical items in the input.

U2 - 10.1111/lang.12204

DO - 10.1111/lang.12204

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 171

EP - 207

JO - Language Learning

JF - Language Learning

SN - 0023-8333

IS - 1

ER -