Do addressees adopt the perspective of the speaker?

Martin J. Pickering, Janet F. McLean, Chiara Gambi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Do interlocutors interpret language as though they were “in the shoes of” the speaker? People can interpret utterances describing actions from an internal perspective (as though they are performing the action), or from an external perspective (as though they are observing the action). In Experiment 1, the speaker produced sentences such as I am cutting the tomato, and the addressee matched these sentences against pictures taking internal or external perspectives to the action. The addressee tended to take an external perspective on sentences involving I and an internal perspective to sentences involving you, irrespective of whether the interlocutors were adjacent to or opposite each other. In Experiment 2, the interlocutors alternated between acting as speaker and addressee, and the addressee tended to take an internal perspective for sentences involving I and an external perspective for sentences involving you; we also assessed the perspective that the speaker adopted. The results argue against a simple simulation account, and also against an account in which the comprehender adopts a perspective that straightforwardly accords with the meaning of the sentence. Instead, the comprehender appeared to take a complementary perspective to the speaker, perhaps to retain independence from the speaker.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-269
Number of pages9
JournalActa Psychologica
Volume141
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Shoes
Lycopersicon esculentum
Language
Addressee
Interlocutors

Cite this

Pickering, Martin J. ; McLean, Janet F. ; Gambi, Chiara. / Do addressees adopt the perspective of the speaker?. In: Acta Psychologica. 2012 ; Vol. 141, No. 2. pp. 261-269.
@article{f2ffa9512df7408283f3704906522cf8,
title = "Do addressees adopt the perspective of the speaker?",
abstract = "Do interlocutors interpret language as though they were “in the shoes of” the speaker? People can interpret utterances describing actions from an internal perspective (as though they are performing the action), or from an external perspective (as though they are observing the action). In Experiment 1, the speaker produced sentences such as I am cutting the tomato, and the addressee matched these sentences against pictures taking internal or external perspectives to the action. The addressee tended to take an external perspective on sentences involving I and an internal perspective to sentences involving you, irrespective of whether the interlocutors were adjacent to or opposite each other. In Experiment 2, the interlocutors alternated between acting as speaker and addressee, and the addressee tended to take an internal perspective for sentences involving I and an external perspective for sentences involving you; we also assessed the perspective that the speaker adopted. The results argue against a simple simulation account, and also against an account in which the comprehender adopts a perspective that straightforwardly accords with the meaning of the sentence. Instead, the comprehender appeared to take a complementary perspective to the speaker, perhaps to retain independence from the speaker.",
author = "Pickering, {Martin J.} and McLean, {Janet F.} and Chiara Gambi",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.001",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
pages = "261--269",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
issn = "0001-6918",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Do addressees adopt the perspective of the speaker? / Pickering, Martin J.; McLean, Janet F.; Gambi, Chiara.

In: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 141, No. 2, 23.06.2012, p. 261-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do addressees adopt the perspective of the speaker?

AU - Pickering, Martin J.

AU - McLean, Janet F.

AU - Gambi, Chiara

PY - 2012/6/23

Y1 - 2012/6/23

N2 - Do interlocutors interpret language as though they were “in the shoes of” the speaker? People can interpret utterances describing actions from an internal perspective (as though they are performing the action), or from an external perspective (as though they are observing the action). In Experiment 1, the speaker produced sentences such as I am cutting the tomato, and the addressee matched these sentences against pictures taking internal or external perspectives to the action. The addressee tended to take an external perspective on sentences involving I and an internal perspective to sentences involving you, irrespective of whether the interlocutors were adjacent to or opposite each other. In Experiment 2, the interlocutors alternated between acting as speaker and addressee, and the addressee tended to take an internal perspective for sentences involving I and an external perspective for sentences involving you; we also assessed the perspective that the speaker adopted. The results argue against a simple simulation account, and also against an account in which the comprehender adopts a perspective that straightforwardly accords with the meaning of the sentence. Instead, the comprehender appeared to take a complementary perspective to the speaker, perhaps to retain independence from the speaker.

AB - Do interlocutors interpret language as though they were “in the shoes of” the speaker? People can interpret utterances describing actions from an internal perspective (as though they are performing the action), or from an external perspective (as though they are observing the action). In Experiment 1, the speaker produced sentences such as I am cutting the tomato, and the addressee matched these sentences against pictures taking internal or external perspectives to the action. The addressee tended to take an external perspective on sentences involving I and an internal perspective to sentences involving you, irrespective of whether the interlocutors were adjacent to or opposite each other. In Experiment 2, the interlocutors alternated between acting as speaker and addressee, and the addressee tended to take an internal perspective for sentences involving I and an external perspective for sentences involving you; we also assessed the perspective that the speaker adopted. The results argue against a simple simulation account, and also against an account in which the comprehender adopts a perspective that straightforwardly accords with the meaning of the sentence. Instead, the comprehender appeared to take a complementary perspective to the speaker, perhaps to retain independence from the speaker.

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.001

M3 - Article

VL - 141

SP - 261

EP - 269

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

SN - 0001-6918

IS - 2

ER -