Do children copy an expert or a majority? Examining selective learning in instrumental and normative contexts

Emily R. R. Burdett, Amanda J. Lucas, Daphna Buchsbaum, Nicola McGuigan, Lara A. Wood, Andrew Whiten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study examined whether instrumental and normative learning contexts differentially influence 4- to 7-year-old children’s social learning strategies; specifically, their dispositions to copy an expert versus a majority consensus. Experiment 1 (N = 44) established that children copied a relatively competent “expert” individual over an incompetent individual in both kinds of learning context. In experiment 2 (N = 80) we then tested whether children would copy a competent individual versus a majority, in each of the two different learning contexts. Results showed that individual children differed in strategy, preferring with significant consistency across two different test trials to copy either the competent individual or the majority. This study is the first to show that children prefer to copy more competent individuals when shown competing methods of achieving an instrumental goal (Experiment 1) and provides new evidence that children, at least in our “individualist” culture, may consistently express either a competency or majority bias in learning both instrumental and normative information (Experiment 2). This effect was similar in the instrumental and normative learning contexts we applied.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0164698
Number of pages20
JournalPLoS One
Volume11
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Operant Conditioning
learning
Experiments
Learning
Consensus

Cite this

Burdett, Emily R. R. ; Lucas, Amanda J. ; Buchsbaum, Daphna ; McGuigan, Nicola ; Wood, Lara A. ; Whiten, Andrew. / Do children copy an expert or a majority? Examining selective learning in instrumental and normative contexts. In: PLoS One. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 10.
@article{afddbe99f7944c0d82c47d5986ebc9ab,
title = "Do children copy an expert or a majority? Examining selective learning in instrumental and normative contexts",
abstract = "This study examined whether instrumental and normative learning contexts differentially influence 4- to 7-year-old children’s social learning strategies; specifically, their dispositions to copy an expert versus a majority consensus. Experiment 1 (N = 44) established that children copied a relatively competent “expert” individual over an incompetent individual in both kinds of learning context. In experiment 2 (N = 80) we then tested whether children would copy a competent individual versus a majority, in each of the two different learning contexts. Results showed that individual children differed in strategy, preferring with significant consistency across two different test trials to copy either the competent individual or the majority. This study is the first to show that children prefer to copy more competent individuals when shown competing methods of achieving an instrumental goal (Experiment 1) and provides new evidence that children, at least in our “individualist” culture, may consistently express either a competency or majority bias in learning both instrumental and normative information (Experiment 2). This effect was similar in the instrumental and normative learning contexts we applied.",
author = "Burdett, {Emily R. R.} and Lucas, {Amanda J.} and Daphna Buchsbaum and Nicola McGuigan and Wood, {Lara A.} and Andrew Whiten",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0164698",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "10",

}

Do children copy an expert or a majority? Examining selective learning in instrumental and normative contexts. / Burdett, Emily R. R.; Lucas, Amanda J.; Buchsbaum, Daphna; McGuigan, Nicola; Wood, Lara A.; Whiten, Andrew.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 11, No. 10, e0164698, 21.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do children copy an expert or a majority? Examining selective learning in instrumental and normative contexts

AU - Burdett, Emily R. R.

AU - Lucas, Amanda J.

AU - Buchsbaum, Daphna

AU - McGuigan, Nicola

AU - Wood, Lara A.

AU - Whiten, Andrew

PY - 2016/10/21

Y1 - 2016/10/21

N2 - This study examined whether instrumental and normative learning contexts differentially influence 4- to 7-year-old children’s social learning strategies; specifically, their dispositions to copy an expert versus a majority consensus. Experiment 1 (N = 44) established that children copied a relatively competent “expert” individual over an incompetent individual in both kinds of learning context. In experiment 2 (N = 80) we then tested whether children would copy a competent individual versus a majority, in each of the two different learning contexts. Results showed that individual children differed in strategy, preferring with significant consistency across two different test trials to copy either the competent individual or the majority. This study is the first to show that children prefer to copy more competent individuals when shown competing methods of achieving an instrumental goal (Experiment 1) and provides new evidence that children, at least in our “individualist” culture, may consistently express either a competency or majority bias in learning both instrumental and normative information (Experiment 2). This effect was similar in the instrumental and normative learning contexts we applied.

AB - This study examined whether instrumental and normative learning contexts differentially influence 4- to 7-year-old children’s social learning strategies; specifically, their dispositions to copy an expert versus a majority consensus. Experiment 1 (N = 44) established that children copied a relatively competent “expert” individual over an incompetent individual in both kinds of learning context. In experiment 2 (N = 80) we then tested whether children would copy a competent individual versus a majority, in each of the two different learning contexts. Results showed that individual children differed in strategy, preferring with significant consistency across two different test trials to copy either the competent individual or the majority. This study is the first to show that children prefer to copy more competent individuals when shown competing methods of achieving an instrumental goal (Experiment 1) and provides new evidence that children, at least in our “individualist” culture, may consistently express either a competency or majority bias in learning both instrumental and normative information (Experiment 2). This effect was similar in the instrumental and normative learning contexts we applied.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0164698

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0164698

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 10

M1 - e0164698

ER -