ECJ Advocate General rejects EU patent litigation scheme

Enrico Bonadio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Opinion 1/09 of the Advocate General, Juliane Kokott, 2 July 2010. The Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has found that the EU centralized patent litigation system recently proposed by the Council of the European Union does not comply with EU law. In her opinion, among the various incompatibilities, she stressed that the proposed linguistic system would violate the rights of defence. This opinion constitutes a blow to the efforts to finally reach the long-awaited EU patent litigation scheme (as envisaged in the Draft Agreement on the European and Community Patents Court). This blow will be even stronger, should the ECJ confirm her opinion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)826-827
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice
Volume5
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

opinion
patent
EU
European Council of Ministers
patent system
court of justice
incompatibility
European Law
defense
court
linguistics
system

Cite this

Bonadio, Enrico / ECJ Advocate General rejects EU patent litigation scheme.

In: Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Vol. 5, No. 12, 2010, p. 826-827.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{933c1a4a8e3a4f61bed0721b13e9f0bf,
title = "ECJ Advocate General rejects EU patent litigation scheme",
abstract = "Opinion 1/09 of the Advocate General, Juliane Kokott, 2 July 2010. The Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has found that the EU centralized patent litigation system recently proposed by the Council of the European Union does not comply with EU law. In her opinion, among the various incompatibilities, she stressed that the proposed linguistic system would violate the rights of defence. This opinion constitutes a blow to the efforts to finally reach the long-awaited EU patent litigation scheme (as envisaged in the Draft Agreement on the European and Community Patents Court). This blow will be even stronger, should the ECJ confirm her opinion.",
author = "Enrico Bonadio",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1093/jiplp/jpq157",
volume = "5",
pages = "826--827",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice",
issn = "1747-1532",
number = "12",

}

ECJ Advocate General rejects EU patent litigation scheme. / Bonadio, Enrico.

In: Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Vol. 5, No. 12, 2010, p. 826-827.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ECJ Advocate General rejects EU patent litigation scheme

AU - Bonadio,Enrico

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Opinion 1/09 of the Advocate General, Juliane Kokott, 2 July 2010. The Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has found that the EU centralized patent litigation system recently proposed by the Council of the European Union does not comply with EU law. In her opinion, among the various incompatibilities, she stressed that the proposed linguistic system would violate the rights of defence. This opinion constitutes a blow to the efforts to finally reach the long-awaited EU patent litigation scheme (as envisaged in the Draft Agreement on the European and Community Patents Court). This blow will be even stronger, should the ECJ confirm her opinion.

AB - Opinion 1/09 of the Advocate General, Juliane Kokott, 2 July 2010. The Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has found that the EU centralized patent litigation system recently proposed by the Council of the European Union does not comply with EU law. In her opinion, among the various incompatibilities, she stressed that the proposed linguistic system would violate the rights of defence. This opinion constitutes a blow to the efforts to finally reach the long-awaited EU patent litigation scheme (as envisaged in the Draft Agreement on the European and Community Patents Court). This blow will be even stronger, should the ECJ confirm her opinion.

U2 - 10.1093/jiplp/jpq157

DO - 10.1093/jiplp/jpq157

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 826

EP - 827

JO - Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice

T2 - Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice

JF - Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice

SN - 1747-1532

IS - 12

ER -