Efficacy of physical activity interventions in post-natal populations: systematic review, meta-analysis and content coding of behaviour change techniques

Alyssa Sara Gilinsky*, Hannah Dale, Clare Robinson, Adrienne R. Hughes, Rhona McInnes, David Lavallee

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis reports the efficacy of post-natal physical activity change interventions with content coding of behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were searched for interventions published from January 1980 to July 2013. Inclusion criteria were: (i) interventions including ≥1 BCT designed to change physical activity behaviour, (ii) studies reporting ≥1 physical activity outcome, (iii) interventions commencing later than four weeks after childbirth and (iv) studies including participants who had given birth within the last year. Controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Interventions were coded using the 40-item Coventry, Aberdeen & London - Refined (CALO-RE) taxonomy of BCTs and study quality assessment was conducted using Cochrane criteria. Twenty studies were included in the review (meta-analysis: n = 14). Seven were interventions conducted with healthy inactive post-natal women. Nine were post-natal weight management studies. Two studies included women with post-natal depression. Two studies focused on improving general well-being. Studies in healthy populations but not for weight management successfully changed physical activity. Interventions increased frequency but not volume of physical activity or walking behaviour. Efficacious interventions always included the BCTs ‘goal setting (behaviour)’ and ‘prompt self-monitoring of behaviour’.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-263
Number of pages20
JournalHealth Psychology Review
Volume9
Issue number2
Early online date2 Apr 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Exercise
Population
Parturition
Weights and Measures
Postpartum Depression
MEDLINE
Walking
Databases

Cite this

Gilinsky, Alyssa Sara ; Dale, Hannah ; Robinson, Clare ; Hughes, Adrienne R. ; McInnes, Rhona ; Lavallee, David. / Efficacy of physical activity interventions in post-natal populations : systematic review, meta-analysis and content coding of behaviour change techniques. In: Health Psychology Review. 2015 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 244-263.
@article{9bc96b24981748afbbaa753ede5b2cb1,
title = "Efficacy of physical activity interventions in post-natal populations: systematic review, meta-analysis and content coding of behaviour change techniques",
abstract = "This systematic review and meta-analysis reports the efficacy of post-natal physical activity change interventions with content coding of behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were searched for interventions published from January 1980 to July 2013. Inclusion criteria were: (i) interventions including ≥1 BCT designed to change physical activity behaviour, (ii) studies reporting ≥1 physical activity outcome, (iii) interventions commencing later than four weeks after childbirth and (iv) studies including participants who had given birth within the last year. Controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Interventions were coded using the 40-item Coventry, Aberdeen & London - Refined (CALO-RE) taxonomy of BCTs and study quality assessment was conducted using Cochrane criteria. Twenty studies were included in the review (meta-analysis: n = 14). Seven were interventions conducted with healthy inactive post-natal women. Nine were post-natal weight management studies. Two studies included women with post-natal depression. Two studies focused on improving general well-being. Studies in healthy populations but not for weight management successfully changed physical activity. Interventions increased frequency but not volume of physical activity or walking behaviour. Efficacious interventions always included the BCTs ‘goal setting (behaviour)’ and ‘prompt self-monitoring of behaviour’.",
author = "Gilinsky, {Alyssa Sara} and Hannah Dale and Clare Robinson and Hughes, {Adrienne R.} and Rhona McInnes and David Lavallee",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17437199.2014.899059",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "244--263",
journal = "Health Psychology Review",
issn = "1743-7199",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Efficacy of physical activity interventions in post-natal populations : systematic review, meta-analysis and content coding of behaviour change techniques. / Gilinsky, Alyssa Sara; Dale, Hannah; Robinson, Clare; Hughes, Adrienne R.; McInnes, Rhona; Lavallee, David.

In: Health Psychology Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 244-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of physical activity interventions in post-natal populations

T2 - systematic review, meta-analysis and content coding of behaviour change techniques

AU - Gilinsky, Alyssa Sara

AU - Dale, Hannah

AU - Robinson, Clare

AU - Hughes, Adrienne R.

AU - McInnes, Rhona

AU - Lavallee, David

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This systematic review and meta-analysis reports the efficacy of post-natal physical activity change interventions with content coding of behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were searched for interventions published from January 1980 to July 2013. Inclusion criteria were: (i) interventions including ≥1 BCT designed to change physical activity behaviour, (ii) studies reporting ≥1 physical activity outcome, (iii) interventions commencing later than four weeks after childbirth and (iv) studies including participants who had given birth within the last year. Controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Interventions were coded using the 40-item Coventry, Aberdeen & London - Refined (CALO-RE) taxonomy of BCTs and study quality assessment was conducted using Cochrane criteria. Twenty studies were included in the review (meta-analysis: n = 14). Seven were interventions conducted with healthy inactive post-natal women. Nine were post-natal weight management studies. Two studies included women with post-natal depression. Two studies focused on improving general well-being. Studies in healthy populations but not for weight management successfully changed physical activity. Interventions increased frequency but not volume of physical activity or walking behaviour. Efficacious interventions always included the BCTs ‘goal setting (behaviour)’ and ‘prompt self-monitoring of behaviour’.

AB - This systematic review and meta-analysis reports the efficacy of post-natal physical activity change interventions with content coding of behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were searched for interventions published from January 1980 to July 2013. Inclusion criteria were: (i) interventions including ≥1 BCT designed to change physical activity behaviour, (ii) studies reporting ≥1 physical activity outcome, (iii) interventions commencing later than four weeks after childbirth and (iv) studies including participants who had given birth within the last year. Controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Interventions were coded using the 40-item Coventry, Aberdeen & London - Refined (CALO-RE) taxonomy of BCTs and study quality assessment was conducted using Cochrane criteria. Twenty studies were included in the review (meta-analysis: n = 14). Seven were interventions conducted with healthy inactive post-natal women. Nine were post-natal weight management studies. Two studies included women with post-natal depression. Two studies focused on improving general well-being. Studies in healthy populations but not for weight management successfully changed physical activity. Interventions increased frequency but not volume of physical activity or walking behaviour. Efficacious interventions always included the BCTs ‘goal setting (behaviour)’ and ‘prompt self-monitoring of behaviour’.

U2 - 10.1080/17437199.2014.899059

DO - 10.1080/17437199.2014.899059

M3 - Article

C2 - 26209211

AN - SCOPUS:84938289063

VL - 9

SP - 244

EP - 263

JO - Health Psychology Review

JF - Health Psychology Review

SN - 1743-7199

IS - 2

ER -