Exploring preferences for symptom management in primary care: a discrete choice experiment using a questionnaire survey

Anne McAteer, Deokhee Yi, Verity Watson, Patricia Norwood, Mandy Ryan, Philip C Hannaford, Alison M Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptoms are important drivers for the use of primary care services. Strategies aimed at shifting the focus away from the GP have broadened the range of primary healthcare available.

AIM: To explore preferences for managing symptoms and investigate trade-offs that the public are willing to make when deciding between different primary care services.

DESIGN AND SETTING: UK-wide postal questionnaire survey of 1370 adults.

METHOD: A discrete choice experiment examined management preferences for three symptoms of differing seriousness (diarrhoea, dizziness, and chest pain). Willingness-to-pay estimates compared preferences between symptoms, and by sex, age, and income.

RESULTS: Preferences differed significantly between symptoms. 'Self-care' was the preferred action for diarrhoea and 'consulting a GP' for dizziness and chest pain. 'Waiting time' and 'chance of a satisfactory outcome' were important factors for all three symptoms, although their relative importance differed. Broadly, people were more prepared to wait longer and less prepared to trade a good chance of a satisfactory outcome for symptoms rated as more serious. Generally, preferences within subgroups followed similar patterns as for the whole sample, although there were differences in the relative strength of preferences.

CONCLUSION: Despite increased choices in primary care, 'traditional' actions of 'self-care' for minor symptoms and 'GP consultation' for more serious symptoms were preferred. The present findings suggest, however, that people may be willing to trade between different health services, particularly for less serious symptoms. Understanding the relative importance of different factors may help inform interventions aimed at changing management behaviour or improving services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e478-e488
Number of pages11
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume65
Issue number636
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Dizziness
Self Care
Chest Pain
Diarrhea
Health Services
Referral and Consultation
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

McAteer, Anne ; Yi, Deokhee ; Watson, Verity ; Norwood, Patricia ; Ryan, Mandy ; Hannaford, Philip C ; Elliott, Alison M. / Exploring preferences for symptom management in primary care : a discrete choice experiment using a questionnaire survey. In: British Journal of General Practice. 2015 ; Vol. 65, No. 636. pp. e478-e488.
@article{5bc140e89e084565af3dbb75046c2100,
title = "Exploring preferences for symptom management in primary care: a discrete choice experiment using a questionnaire survey",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Symptoms are important drivers for the use of primary care services. Strategies aimed at shifting the focus away from the GP have broadened the range of primary healthcare available.AIM: To explore preferences for managing symptoms and investigate trade-offs that the public are willing to make when deciding between different primary care services.DESIGN AND SETTING: UK-wide postal questionnaire survey of 1370 adults.METHOD: A discrete choice experiment examined management preferences for three symptoms of differing seriousness (diarrhoea, dizziness, and chest pain). Willingness-to-pay estimates compared preferences between symptoms, and by sex, age, and income.RESULTS: Preferences differed significantly between symptoms. 'Self-care' was the preferred action for diarrhoea and 'consulting a GP' for dizziness and chest pain. 'Waiting time' and 'chance of a satisfactory outcome' were important factors for all three symptoms, although their relative importance differed. Broadly, people were more prepared to wait longer and less prepared to trade a good chance of a satisfactory outcome for symptoms rated as more serious. Generally, preferences within subgroups followed similar patterns as for the whole sample, although there were differences in the relative strength of preferences.CONCLUSION: Despite increased choices in primary care, 'traditional' actions of 'self-care' for minor symptoms and 'GP consultation' for more serious symptoms were preferred. The present findings suggest, however, that people may be willing to trade between different health services, particularly for less serious symptoms. Understanding the relative importance of different factors may help inform interventions aimed at changing management behaviour or improving services.",
author = "Anne McAteer and Deokhee Yi and Verity Watson and Patricia Norwood and Mandy Ryan and Hannaford, {Philip C} and Elliott, {Alison M}",
note = "{\circledC} British Journal of General Practice 2015.",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
doi = "10.3399/bjgp15X685705",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "e478--e488",
journal = "British Journal of General Practice",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",
number = "636",

}

Exploring preferences for symptom management in primary care : a discrete choice experiment using a questionnaire survey. / McAteer, Anne; Yi, Deokhee; Watson, Verity; Norwood, Patricia; Ryan, Mandy; Hannaford, Philip C; Elliott, Alison M.

In: British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 65, No. 636, 07.2015, p. e478-e488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring preferences for symptom management in primary care

T2 - a discrete choice experiment using a questionnaire survey

AU - McAteer, Anne

AU - Yi, Deokhee

AU - Watson, Verity

AU - Norwood, Patricia

AU - Ryan, Mandy

AU - Hannaford, Philip C

AU - Elliott, Alison M

N1 - © British Journal of General Practice 2015.

PY - 2015/7

Y1 - 2015/7

N2 - BACKGROUND: Symptoms are important drivers for the use of primary care services. Strategies aimed at shifting the focus away from the GP have broadened the range of primary healthcare available.AIM: To explore preferences for managing symptoms and investigate trade-offs that the public are willing to make when deciding between different primary care services.DESIGN AND SETTING: UK-wide postal questionnaire survey of 1370 adults.METHOD: A discrete choice experiment examined management preferences for three symptoms of differing seriousness (diarrhoea, dizziness, and chest pain). Willingness-to-pay estimates compared preferences between symptoms, and by sex, age, and income.RESULTS: Preferences differed significantly between symptoms. 'Self-care' was the preferred action for diarrhoea and 'consulting a GP' for dizziness and chest pain. 'Waiting time' and 'chance of a satisfactory outcome' were important factors for all three symptoms, although their relative importance differed. Broadly, people were more prepared to wait longer and less prepared to trade a good chance of a satisfactory outcome for symptoms rated as more serious. Generally, preferences within subgroups followed similar patterns as for the whole sample, although there were differences in the relative strength of preferences.CONCLUSION: Despite increased choices in primary care, 'traditional' actions of 'self-care' for minor symptoms and 'GP consultation' for more serious symptoms were preferred. The present findings suggest, however, that people may be willing to trade between different health services, particularly for less serious symptoms. Understanding the relative importance of different factors may help inform interventions aimed at changing management behaviour or improving services.

AB - BACKGROUND: Symptoms are important drivers for the use of primary care services. Strategies aimed at shifting the focus away from the GP have broadened the range of primary healthcare available.AIM: To explore preferences for managing symptoms and investigate trade-offs that the public are willing to make when deciding between different primary care services.DESIGN AND SETTING: UK-wide postal questionnaire survey of 1370 adults.METHOD: A discrete choice experiment examined management preferences for three symptoms of differing seriousness (diarrhoea, dizziness, and chest pain). Willingness-to-pay estimates compared preferences between symptoms, and by sex, age, and income.RESULTS: Preferences differed significantly between symptoms. 'Self-care' was the preferred action for diarrhoea and 'consulting a GP' for dizziness and chest pain. 'Waiting time' and 'chance of a satisfactory outcome' were important factors for all three symptoms, although their relative importance differed. Broadly, people were more prepared to wait longer and less prepared to trade a good chance of a satisfactory outcome for symptoms rated as more serious. Generally, preferences within subgroups followed similar patterns as for the whole sample, although there were differences in the relative strength of preferences.CONCLUSION: Despite increased choices in primary care, 'traditional' actions of 'self-care' for minor symptoms and 'GP consultation' for more serious symptoms were preferred. The present findings suggest, however, that people may be willing to trade between different health services, particularly for less serious symptoms. Understanding the relative importance of different factors may help inform interventions aimed at changing management behaviour or improving services.

U2 - 10.3399/bjgp15X685705

DO - 10.3399/bjgp15X685705

M3 - Article

C2 - 26077269

VL - 65

SP - e478-e488

JO - British Journal of General Practice

JF - British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 636

ER -