Factors related to the onset and persistence of chronic back pain in the community: results from a general population follow-up study

Blair H Smith, Alison M Elliott, Philip C Hannaford, W Alastair Chambers, W Cairns Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We compared the prevalence of chronic back pain (CBP) at two points 4 years apart and examined socio-demographic, health, and pain-related factors associated with its onset and persistence.

METHOD: A random population sample of 2,184 adults was surveyed in 1996 and resurveyed in 2000. The questionnaire included chronic pain case definition questions (pain for 3 months or longer); the cause (1996) or site (2000) of any chronic pain; the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire; the Level of Expressed Need (LEN) questionnaire; the SF-36 general health questionnaire; and demographic questions. Those with CBP in 1996 and 2000 had "persistent" CBP; those with CBP in 1996 but not 2000 had "recovered" CBP; those with CBP in 2000 but not 1996 had "new" CBP.

RESULTS: Corrected response rates were 82.3% (1996) and 83.0% (2000). The sample prevalence of CBP was 16% (1996) and 27% (2000). Factors in 1996 independently associated with "persistent" compared with "recovered" CBP were preexisting arthritis, high LEN, poor mental health, and not living alone. Factors independently predicting "new" CBP compared with no previous CBP were previous chronic pain elsewhere and poor physical health. "Persistent" CBP was associated with more severe pain, higher LEN, and poorer general health than "new" CBP.

DISCUSSION: CBP is a common and lasting problem, whose persistence and onset are predicted by clinical (especially pain) and help-seeking behavior factors, rather than socio-demographic. Prevention should focus on these factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1032-1040
Number of pages9
JournalSpine
Volume29
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Back Pain
Chronic Pain
Population
Pain
Health
Demography

Cite this

Smith, Blair H ; Elliott, Alison M ; Hannaford, Philip C ; Chambers, W Alastair ; Smith, W Cairns. / Factors related to the onset and persistence of chronic back pain in the community : results from a general population follow-up study. In: Spine. 2004 ; Vol. 29, No. 9. pp. 1032-1040.
@article{2beafae7952546e791f05a20cadc6d61,
title = "Factors related to the onset and persistence of chronic back pain in the community: results from a general population follow-up study",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: We compared the prevalence of chronic back pain (CBP) at two points 4 years apart and examined socio-demographic, health, and pain-related factors associated with its onset and persistence.METHOD: A random population sample of 2,184 adults was surveyed in 1996 and resurveyed in 2000. The questionnaire included chronic pain case definition questions (pain for 3 months or longer); the cause (1996) or site (2000) of any chronic pain; the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire; the Level of Expressed Need (LEN) questionnaire; the SF-36 general health questionnaire; and demographic questions. Those with CBP in 1996 and 2000 had {"}persistent{"} CBP; those with CBP in 1996 but not 2000 had {"}recovered{"} CBP; those with CBP in 2000 but not 1996 had {"}new{"} CBP.RESULTS: Corrected response rates were 82.3{\%} (1996) and 83.0{\%} (2000). The sample prevalence of CBP was 16{\%} (1996) and 27{\%} (2000). Factors in 1996 independently associated with {"}persistent{"} compared with {"}recovered{"} CBP were preexisting arthritis, high LEN, poor mental health, and not living alone. Factors independently predicting {"}new{"} CBP compared with no previous CBP were previous chronic pain elsewhere and poor physical health. {"}Persistent{"} CBP was associated with more severe pain, higher LEN, and poorer general health than {"}new{"} CBP.DISCUSSION: CBP is a common and lasting problem, whose persistence and onset are predicted by clinical (especially pain) and help-seeking behavior factors, rather than socio-demographic. Prevention should focus on these factors.",
author = "Smith, {Blair H} and Elliott, {Alison M} and Hannaford, {Philip C} and Chambers, {W Alastair} and Smith, {W Cairns}",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1032--1040",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

Factors related to the onset and persistence of chronic back pain in the community : results from a general population follow-up study. / Smith, Blair H; Elliott, Alison M; Hannaford, Philip C; Chambers, W Alastair; Smith, W Cairns.

In: Spine, Vol. 29, No. 9, 01.05.2004, p. 1032-1040.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors related to the onset and persistence of chronic back pain in the community

T2 - results from a general population follow-up study

AU - Smith, Blair H

AU - Elliott, Alison M

AU - Hannaford, Philip C

AU - Chambers, W Alastair

AU - Smith, W Cairns

PY - 2004/5/1

Y1 - 2004/5/1

N2 - INTRODUCTION: We compared the prevalence of chronic back pain (CBP) at two points 4 years apart and examined socio-demographic, health, and pain-related factors associated with its onset and persistence.METHOD: A random population sample of 2,184 adults was surveyed in 1996 and resurveyed in 2000. The questionnaire included chronic pain case definition questions (pain for 3 months or longer); the cause (1996) or site (2000) of any chronic pain; the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire; the Level of Expressed Need (LEN) questionnaire; the SF-36 general health questionnaire; and demographic questions. Those with CBP in 1996 and 2000 had "persistent" CBP; those with CBP in 1996 but not 2000 had "recovered" CBP; those with CBP in 2000 but not 1996 had "new" CBP.RESULTS: Corrected response rates were 82.3% (1996) and 83.0% (2000). The sample prevalence of CBP was 16% (1996) and 27% (2000). Factors in 1996 independently associated with "persistent" compared with "recovered" CBP were preexisting arthritis, high LEN, poor mental health, and not living alone. Factors independently predicting "new" CBP compared with no previous CBP were previous chronic pain elsewhere and poor physical health. "Persistent" CBP was associated with more severe pain, higher LEN, and poorer general health than "new" CBP.DISCUSSION: CBP is a common and lasting problem, whose persistence and onset are predicted by clinical (especially pain) and help-seeking behavior factors, rather than socio-demographic. Prevention should focus on these factors.

AB - INTRODUCTION: We compared the prevalence of chronic back pain (CBP) at two points 4 years apart and examined socio-demographic, health, and pain-related factors associated with its onset and persistence.METHOD: A random population sample of 2,184 adults was surveyed in 1996 and resurveyed in 2000. The questionnaire included chronic pain case definition questions (pain for 3 months or longer); the cause (1996) or site (2000) of any chronic pain; the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire; the Level of Expressed Need (LEN) questionnaire; the SF-36 general health questionnaire; and demographic questions. Those with CBP in 1996 and 2000 had "persistent" CBP; those with CBP in 1996 but not 2000 had "recovered" CBP; those with CBP in 2000 but not 1996 had "new" CBP.RESULTS: Corrected response rates were 82.3% (1996) and 83.0% (2000). The sample prevalence of CBP was 16% (1996) and 27% (2000). Factors in 1996 independently associated with "persistent" compared with "recovered" CBP were preexisting arthritis, high LEN, poor mental health, and not living alone. Factors independently predicting "new" CBP compared with no previous CBP were previous chronic pain elsewhere and poor physical health. "Persistent" CBP was associated with more severe pain, higher LEN, and poorer general health than "new" CBP.DISCUSSION: CBP is a common and lasting problem, whose persistence and onset are predicted by clinical (especially pain) and help-seeking behavior factors, rather than socio-demographic. Prevention should focus on these factors.

M3 - Article

C2 - 15105678

VL - 29

SP - 1032

EP - 1040

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 9

ER -