Feeding back to feed forward

formative assessment as a platform for effective learning

Lucy Wheatley, Alex McInch, Scott Fleming, Rhiannon Lord

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Students construct meaning through relevant learning activities (Biggs, 2003) which are largely determined by the type, amount, and timing of feedback (Carless, 2006). The aim of the present study was to develop a greater awareness and understanding of formative assessment and feedback practices and their relationship with learning. During 2011 five focus group discussions were undertaken with students and academic staff involved with a range of modules and degree pathways at a UK University. Three of the focus groups were with undergraduate students (one at each level of study), and one was with taught postgraduate students. Discussions focussed on integration of formative assessment and feedback into modules, as well as an exploration of the effectiveness of feedback on future learning. The findings revealed that in order to emphasise continuous learning – feeding back to feed forward (Rushton, 2005) – and to encourage self-regulated learning (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006), students need to have opportunities to make mistakes and to learn from them prior to summative assessment (through formative assessment and feedback). There was also firm evidence of different approaches to learning, emphasising in particular the transitional importance of the first year of study as the foundation upon which future achievement is built.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Number of pages30
JournalKentucky Journal of Higher Education Policy and Practice
Volume3
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2015

Fingerprint

learning
student
group discussion
staff
evidence
Group

Cite this

@article{89e799e70cfb4735b873dbf4a23d96ef,
title = "Feeding back to feed forward: formative assessment as a platform for effective learning",
abstract = "Students construct meaning through relevant learning activities (Biggs, 2003) which are largely determined by the type, amount, and timing of feedback (Carless, 2006). The aim of the present study was to develop a greater awareness and understanding of formative assessment and feedback practices and their relationship with learning. During 2011 five focus group discussions were undertaken with students and academic staff involved with a range of modules and degree pathways at a UK University. Three of the focus groups were with undergraduate students (one at each level of study), and one was with taught postgraduate students. Discussions focussed on integration of formative assessment and feedback into modules, as well as an exploration of the effectiveness of feedback on future learning. The findings revealed that in order to emphasise continuous learning – feeding back to feed forward (Rushton, 2005) – and to encourage self-regulated learning (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006), students need to have opportunities to make mistakes and to learn from them prior to summative assessment (through formative assessment and feedback). There was also firm evidence of different approaches to learning, emphasising in particular the transitional importance of the first year of study as the foundation upon which future achievement is built.",
author = "Lucy Wheatley and Alex McInch and Scott Fleming and Rhiannon Lord",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Kentucky Journal of Higher Education Policy and Practice",
issn = "2164-5140",
number = "2",

}

Feeding back to feed forward : formative assessment as a platform for effective learning. / Wheatley, Lucy; McInch, Alex; Fleming, Scott; Lord, Rhiannon.

In: Kentucky Journal of Higher Education Policy and Practice, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2, 02.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feeding back to feed forward

T2 - formative assessment as a platform for effective learning

AU - Wheatley, Lucy

AU - McInch, Alex

AU - Fleming, Scott

AU - Lord, Rhiannon

PY - 2015/2

Y1 - 2015/2

N2 - Students construct meaning through relevant learning activities (Biggs, 2003) which are largely determined by the type, amount, and timing of feedback (Carless, 2006). The aim of the present study was to develop a greater awareness and understanding of formative assessment and feedback practices and their relationship with learning. During 2011 five focus group discussions were undertaken with students and academic staff involved with a range of modules and degree pathways at a UK University. Three of the focus groups were with undergraduate students (one at each level of study), and one was with taught postgraduate students. Discussions focussed on integration of formative assessment and feedback into modules, as well as an exploration of the effectiveness of feedback on future learning. The findings revealed that in order to emphasise continuous learning – feeding back to feed forward (Rushton, 2005) – and to encourage self-regulated learning (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006), students need to have opportunities to make mistakes and to learn from them prior to summative assessment (through formative assessment and feedback). There was also firm evidence of different approaches to learning, emphasising in particular the transitional importance of the first year of study as the foundation upon which future achievement is built.

AB - Students construct meaning through relevant learning activities (Biggs, 2003) which are largely determined by the type, amount, and timing of feedback (Carless, 2006). The aim of the present study was to develop a greater awareness and understanding of formative assessment and feedback practices and their relationship with learning. During 2011 five focus group discussions were undertaken with students and academic staff involved with a range of modules and degree pathways at a UK University. Three of the focus groups were with undergraduate students (one at each level of study), and one was with taught postgraduate students. Discussions focussed on integration of formative assessment and feedback into modules, as well as an exploration of the effectiveness of feedback on future learning. The findings revealed that in order to emphasise continuous learning – feeding back to feed forward (Rushton, 2005) – and to encourage self-regulated learning (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006), students need to have opportunities to make mistakes and to learn from them prior to summative assessment (through formative assessment and feedback). There was also firm evidence of different approaches to learning, emphasising in particular the transitional importance of the first year of study as the foundation upon which future achievement is built.

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Kentucky Journal of Higher Education Policy and Practice

JF - Kentucky Journal of Higher Education Policy and Practice

SN - 2164-5140

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -