Human rights abuses at the Rio 2016 Olympics: activism and the media

Adam Talbot, Thomas F. Carter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines activists’ use of human rights as a discourse to contest the impacts of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games by drawing on a wider ethnographic project examining activism at Rio 2016. Focusing on two areas of contention, forced evictions and police brutality, the article considers the way activists framed their grievances and how mainstream international media outlets reported those grievances. While activists fighting against forced evictions explicitly used the language of rights in their activism, media accounts tended not to discuss these issues using this lexicon. Conversely, grassroots activists protesting around the issue of police brutality did not tend to frame their grievances in terms of rights, but these issues were discussed as human rights abuses in the media. This points to a dual role played by activists fighting forced evictions: while they are fighting to keep their own homes, they are also part of a wider discursive battle for the right to housing to be recognised and respected.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-88
Number of pages12
JournalLeisure Studies
Volume37
Issue number1
Early online date17 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Olympic Games
fighting
human rights
abuse
police
dual role
housing
discourse
language
Grievance
Human rights
Olympics
Abuse
Activism
rights
Police

Cite this

Talbot, Adam ; Carter, Thomas F. . / Human rights abuses at the Rio 2016 Olympics : activism and the media. In: Leisure Studies. 2018 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 77-88.
@article{5103763610cb4cc1bceb1be2b4041d94,
title = "Human rights abuses at the Rio 2016 Olympics: activism and the media",
abstract = "This article examines activists’ use of human rights as a discourse to contest the impacts of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games by drawing on a wider ethnographic project examining activism at Rio 2016. Focusing on two areas of contention, forced evictions and police brutality, the article considers the way activists framed their grievances and how mainstream international media outlets reported those grievances. While activists fighting against forced evictions explicitly used the language of rights in their activism, media accounts tended not to discuss these issues using this lexicon. Conversely, grassroots activists protesting around the issue of police brutality did not tend to frame their grievances in terms of rights, but these issues were discussed as human rights abuses in the media. This points to a dual role played by activists fighting forced evictions: while they are fighting to keep their own homes, they are also part of a wider discursive battle for the right to housing to be recognised and respected.",
author = "Adam Talbot and Carter, {Thomas F.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/02614367.2017.1318162",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "77--88",
journal = "Leisure Studies",
issn = "0261-4367",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Human rights abuses at the Rio 2016 Olympics : activism and the media. / Talbot, Adam; Carter, Thomas F. .

In: Leisure Studies, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2018, p. 77-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human rights abuses at the Rio 2016 Olympics

T2 - activism and the media

AU - Talbot, Adam

AU - Carter, Thomas F.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article examines activists’ use of human rights as a discourse to contest the impacts of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games by drawing on a wider ethnographic project examining activism at Rio 2016. Focusing on two areas of contention, forced evictions and police brutality, the article considers the way activists framed their grievances and how mainstream international media outlets reported those grievances. While activists fighting against forced evictions explicitly used the language of rights in their activism, media accounts tended not to discuss these issues using this lexicon. Conversely, grassroots activists protesting around the issue of police brutality did not tend to frame their grievances in terms of rights, but these issues were discussed as human rights abuses in the media. This points to a dual role played by activists fighting forced evictions: while they are fighting to keep their own homes, they are also part of a wider discursive battle for the right to housing to be recognised and respected.

AB - This article examines activists’ use of human rights as a discourse to contest the impacts of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games by drawing on a wider ethnographic project examining activism at Rio 2016. Focusing on two areas of contention, forced evictions and police brutality, the article considers the way activists framed their grievances and how mainstream international media outlets reported those grievances. While activists fighting against forced evictions explicitly used the language of rights in their activism, media accounts tended not to discuss these issues using this lexicon. Conversely, grassroots activists protesting around the issue of police brutality did not tend to frame their grievances in terms of rights, but these issues were discussed as human rights abuses in the media. This points to a dual role played by activists fighting forced evictions: while they are fighting to keep their own homes, they are also part of a wider discursive battle for the right to housing to be recognised and respected.

U2 - 10.1080/02614367.2017.1318162

DO - 10.1080/02614367.2017.1318162

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 77

EP - 88

JO - Leisure Studies

JF - Leisure Studies

SN - 0261-4367

IS - 1

ER -