Illumination as a material service: a comparison between Ancient Rome and early 19th century London

Kai Whiting*, Luis Gabriel Carmona, Lina Brand-Correa, Edward Simpson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Specific combinations of energy flows, material flows and stocks are responsible for those services that support social metabolism. However, few researchers go beyond energy services to ascertain the role that materials play in socioeconomic development. In this paper, we develop the concept and accounting method for material services, which we define as “those functions that materials contribute to personal or societal activity with the purpose of obtaining or facilitating desired end goals or states, regardless of whether or not a material flow or stock is supplied by the market”. In this respect, material services act as an intermediate step that incorporates stock to bridge the gap between resource consumption, accumulation and aspects of wellbeing. We provide a material service case study, which identifies the level of lighting experienced by urban Ancient Romans relative to that enjoyed by inhabitants of 1820s London (the Georgians). Our results show that the average Roman experienced 41,102 lumen-hour, which is more lighting than the Georgian value per capita (at 35,698 lumen-hour). In terms of fuel consumption, Georgians were four times more efficient than their Roman counterparts, but there was a trade-off between materials and energy, given that stock efficiency was 53 times lower than that of the Romans. This trend of improving fuel efficiency at the expense of materials appears to have continued into the 21st century, which holds important implications for sustainable development. Further research needs to be undertaken to ascertain whether this holds true for other material services such as heating, transport and shelter.
Original languageEnglish
Article number106502
Number of pages13
JournalEcological Economics
Volume169
Early online date13 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

material
comparison
services
energy flow
twenty first century
fuel consumption
shelter
trade-off
energy
sustainable development
metabolism
heating
market
resource
Energy
lighting
material flow
Material flow
trend
consumption

Cite this

@article{127319346191424299b7c58ed5ddb853,
title = "Illumination as a material service: a comparison between Ancient Rome and early 19th century London",
abstract = "Specific combinations of energy flows, material flows and stocks are responsible for those services that support social metabolism. However, few researchers go beyond energy services to ascertain the role that materials play in socioeconomic development. In this paper, we develop the concept and accounting method for material services, which we define as “those functions that materials contribute to personal or societal activity with the purpose of obtaining or facilitating desired end goals or states, regardless of whether or not a material flow or stock is supplied by the market”. In this respect, material services act as an intermediate step that incorporates stock to bridge the gap between resource consumption, accumulation and aspects of wellbeing. We provide a material service case study, which identifies the level of lighting experienced by urban Ancient Romans relative to that enjoyed by inhabitants of 1820s London (the Georgians). Our results show that the average Roman experienced 41,102 lumen-hour, which is more lighting than the Georgian value per capita (at 35,698 lumen-hour). In terms of fuel consumption, Georgians were four times more efficient than their Roman counterparts, but there was a trade-off between materials and energy, given that stock efficiency was 53 times lower than that of the Romans. This trend of improving fuel efficiency at the expense of materials appears to have continued into the 21st century, which holds important implications for sustainable development. Further research needs to be undertaken to ascertain whether this holds true for other material services such as heating, transport and shelter.",
author = "Kai Whiting and Carmona, {Luis Gabriel} and Lina Brand-Correa and Edward Simpson",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106502",
language = "English",
volume = "169",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Illumination as a material service : a comparison between Ancient Rome and early 19th century London. / Whiting, Kai; Carmona, Luis Gabriel; Brand-Correa, Lina; Simpson, Edward.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 169, 106502, 01.03.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Illumination as a material service

T2 - a comparison between Ancient Rome and early 19th century London

AU - Whiting, Kai

AU - Carmona, Luis Gabriel

AU - Brand-Correa, Lina

AU - Simpson, Edward

PY - 2019/11/13

Y1 - 2019/11/13

N2 - Specific combinations of energy flows, material flows and stocks are responsible for those services that support social metabolism. However, few researchers go beyond energy services to ascertain the role that materials play in socioeconomic development. In this paper, we develop the concept and accounting method for material services, which we define as “those functions that materials contribute to personal or societal activity with the purpose of obtaining or facilitating desired end goals or states, regardless of whether or not a material flow or stock is supplied by the market”. In this respect, material services act as an intermediate step that incorporates stock to bridge the gap between resource consumption, accumulation and aspects of wellbeing. We provide a material service case study, which identifies the level of lighting experienced by urban Ancient Romans relative to that enjoyed by inhabitants of 1820s London (the Georgians). Our results show that the average Roman experienced 41,102 lumen-hour, which is more lighting than the Georgian value per capita (at 35,698 lumen-hour). In terms of fuel consumption, Georgians were four times more efficient than their Roman counterparts, but there was a trade-off between materials and energy, given that stock efficiency was 53 times lower than that of the Romans. This trend of improving fuel efficiency at the expense of materials appears to have continued into the 21st century, which holds important implications for sustainable development. Further research needs to be undertaken to ascertain whether this holds true for other material services such as heating, transport and shelter.

AB - Specific combinations of energy flows, material flows and stocks are responsible for those services that support social metabolism. However, few researchers go beyond energy services to ascertain the role that materials play in socioeconomic development. In this paper, we develop the concept and accounting method for material services, which we define as “those functions that materials contribute to personal or societal activity with the purpose of obtaining or facilitating desired end goals or states, regardless of whether or not a material flow or stock is supplied by the market”. In this respect, material services act as an intermediate step that incorporates stock to bridge the gap between resource consumption, accumulation and aspects of wellbeing. We provide a material service case study, which identifies the level of lighting experienced by urban Ancient Romans relative to that enjoyed by inhabitants of 1820s London (the Georgians). Our results show that the average Roman experienced 41,102 lumen-hour, which is more lighting than the Georgian value per capita (at 35,698 lumen-hour). In terms of fuel consumption, Georgians were four times more efficient than their Roman counterparts, but there was a trade-off between materials and energy, given that stock efficiency was 53 times lower than that of the Romans. This trend of improving fuel efficiency at the expense of materials appears to have continued into the 21st century, which holds important implications for sustainable development. Further research needs to be undertaken to ascertain whether this holds true for other material services such as heating, transport and shelter.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106502

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106502

M3 - Article

VL - 169

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

M1 - 106502

ER -