Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer

N C Campbell, A M Elliott, L Sharp, L D Ritchie, J Cassidy, J Little

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For common cancers, survival is poorer for deprived and outlying, rural patients. This study investigated whether there were differences in treatment of colorectal and lung cancer in these groups. Case notes of 1314 patients in north and northeast Scotland who were diagnosed with lung or colorectal cancer in 1995 or 1996 were reviewed. On univariate analysis, the proportions of patients receiving surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural categories. Adjusting for disease stage, age and other factors, there was less chemotherapy among deprived patients with lung cancer (odds ratio 0.39; 95% confidence intervals 0.16 to 0.96) and less radiotherapy among outlying patients with colorectal cancer (0.39; 0.19 to 0.82). The time between first referral and treatment also appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural groups. Adjusting for disease stage and other variables, times to lung cancer treatment remained similar, but colorectal cancer treatment was quicker for outlying patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.30; 95% confidence intervals 1.03 to 1.64). These findings suggest that socio-economic status and rurality may have a minor impact on modalities of treatment for colorectal and lung cancer, but do not lead to delays between referral and treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-90
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume87
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Sep 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colorectal Neoplasms
Lung Neoplasms
Economics
Radiotherapy
Therapeutics
Referral and Consultation
Confidence Intervals
Drug Therapy
Age Factors
Scotland
Odds Ratio
Survival
Neoplasms

Cite this

Campbell, N C ; Elliott, A M ; Sharp, L ; Ritchie, L D ; Cassidy, J ; Little, J. / Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer. In: British Journal of Cancer. 2002 ; Vol. 87, No. 6. pp. 585-90.
@article{b6518be05c2d44b08dd25e1a600974da,
title = "Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer",
abstract = "For common cancers, survival is poorer for deprived and outlying, rural patients. This study investigated whether there were differences in treatment of colorectal and lung cancer in these groups. Case notes of 1314 patients in north and northeast Scotland who were diagnosed with lung or colorectal cancer in 1995 or 1996 were reviewed. On univariate analysis, the proportions of patients receiving surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural categories. Adjusting for disease stage, age and other factors, there was less chemotherapy among deprived patients with lung cancer (odds ratio 0.39; 95{\%} confidence intervals 0.16 to 0.96) and less radiotherapy among outlying patients with colorectal cancer (0.39; 0.19 to 0.82). The time between first referral and treatment also appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural groups. Adjusting for disease stage and other variables, times to lung cancer treatment remained similar, but colorectal cancer treatment was quicker for outlying patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.30; 95{\%} confidence intervals 1.03 to 1.64). These findings suggest that socio-economic status and rurality may have a minor impact on modalities of treatment for colorectal and lung cancer, but do not lead to delays between referral and treatment.",
author = "Campbell, {N C} and Elliott, {A M} and L Sharp and Ritchie, {L D} and J Cassidy and J Little",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bjc.6600515",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "585--90",
journal = "British Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0007-0920",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer. / Campbell, N C; Elliott, A M; Sharp, L; Ritchie, L D; Cassidy, J; Little, J.

In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 87, No. 6, 09.09.2002, p. 585-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer

AU - Campbell, N C

AU - Elliott, A M

AU - Sharp, L

AU - Ritchie, L D

AU - Cassidy, J

AU - Little, J

PY - 2002/9/9

Y1 - 2002/9/9

N2 - For common cancers, survival is poorer for deprived and outlying, rural patients. This study investigated whether there were differences in treatment of colorectal and lung cancer in these groups. Case notes of 1314 patients in north and northeast Scotland who were diagnosed with lung or colorectal cancer in 1995 or 1996 were reviewed. On univariate analysis, the proportions of patients receiving surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural categories. Adjusting for disease stage, age and other factors, there was less chemotherapy among deprived patients with lung cancer (odds ratio 0.39; 95% confidence intervals 0.16 to 0.96) and less radiotherapy among outlying patients with colorectal cancer (0.39; 0.19 to 0.82). The time between first referral and treatment also appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural groups. Adjusting for disease stage and other variables, times to lung cancer treatment remained similar, but colorectal cancer treatment was quicker for outlying patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.30; 95% confidence intervals 1.03 to 1.64). These findings suggest that socio-economic status and rurality may have a minor impact on modalities of treatment for colorectal and lung cancer, but do not lead to delays between referral and treatment.

AB - For common cancers, survival is poorer for deprived and outlying, rural patients. This study investigated whether there were differences in treatment of colorectal and lung cancer in these groups. Case notes of 1314 patients in north and northeast Scotland who were diagnosed with lung or colorectal cancer in 1995 or 1996 were reviewed. On univariate analysis, the proportions of patients receiving surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural categories. Adjusting for disease stage, age and other factors, there was less chemotherapy among deprived patients with lung cancer (odds ratio 0.39; 95% confidence intervals 0.16 to 0.96) and less radiotherapy among outlying patients with colorectal cancer (0.39; 0.19 to 0.82). The time between first referral and treatment also appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural groups. Adjusting for disease stage and other variables, times to lung cancer treatment remained similar, but colorectal cancer treatment was quicker for outlying patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.30; 95% confidence intervals 1.03 to 1.64). These findings suggest that socio-economic status and rurality may have a minor impact on modalities of treatment for colorectal and lung cancer, but do not lead to delays between referral and treatment.

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600515

DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600515

M3 - Article

C2 - 12237766

VL - 87

SP - 585

EP - 590

JO - British Journal of Cancer

JF - British Journal of Cancer

SN - 0007-0920

IS - 6

ER -