Increasing discrimination in multi-criteria analysis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Multi criteria methods for supporting decision-making procedures are widely used in sustainability assessment. One of the most important steps in decision-making procedures is the evaluation of policy options or alternatives in order to find a hierarchy of option choices. Utility function value distributions are often constructed for the range of indicators for the options to be assessed. This distribution can be presented as an impact matrix stacked with indicator weights to reflect the relative importance of different indicators for the decision-maker. Solving rules are then introduced to integrate all individual indicator evaluations into a single integral utility estimation. These are often based on the averaging procedures, one of the simplest being arithmetic averaging. Whilst averaging rules are very attractive to decision makers due to their simplicity and logical transparency, using averaging as the first step of the decision-making procedures can significantly reduce the discrimination of the options, especially if there are counteractive individual indicator estimations.

This paper proposes a method to evaluate and overcome this loss of discrimination. The paper explains the basis of a discriminatory analysis approach to sustainability assessment demonstrates its application through the use of illustrative data and describes its application to an existing case study where researchers had applied a number of multi criteria analysis tools. It was concluded that the discriminatory analysis provided a useful addition to the decision-makers toolbox as it provided a means of assessment of the validity of the application of the simple arithmetic averaging technique.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment
EditorsM. Horner, C. Hardcastle, A. Price, J. Bebbington
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherSUE-MoT
Number of pages13
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007
EventSUE-MoT Conference 2007: International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment - Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Duration: 27 Jun 200729 Jun 2007

Conference

ConferenceSUE-MoT Conference 2007
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityGlasgow
Period27/06/0729/06/07

Fingerprint

decision making
sustainability
transparency
indicator
analysis
matrix
decision
evaluation
distribution
method
policy
loss

Cite this

Barannik, V., Blackwood, D. J., & Falconer, R. E. (2007). Increasing discrimination in multi-criteria analysis. In M. Horner, C. Hardcastle, A. Price, & J. Bebbington (Eds.), International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment Glasgow: SUE-MoT.
Barannik, Valeriy ; Blackwood, David J. ; Falconer, Ruth E. / Increasing discrimination in multi-criteria analysis. International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment. editor / M. Horner ; C. Hardcastle ; A. Price ; J. Bebbington. Glasgow : SUE-MoT, 2007.
@inproceedings{1557ec78ca984208988e009ed85869d0,
title = "Increasing discrimination in multi-criteria analysis",
abstract = "Multi criteria methods for supporting decision-making procedures are widely used in sustainability assessment. One of the most important steps in decision-making procedures is the evaluation of policy options or alternatives in order to find a hierarchy of option choices. Utility function value distributions are often constructed for the range of indicators for the options to be assessed. This distribution can be presented as an impact matrix stacked with indicator weights to reflect the relative importance of different indicators for the decision-maker. Solving rules are then introduced to integrate all individual indicator evaluations into a single integral utility estimation. These are often based on the averaging procedures, one of the simplest being arithmetic averaging. Whilst averaging rules are very attractive to decision makers due to their simplicity and logical transparency, using averaging as the first step of the decision-making procedures can significantly reduce the discrimination of the options, especially if there are counteractive individual indicator estimations.This paper proposes a method to evaluate and overcome this loss of discrimination. The paper explains the basis of a discriminatory analysis approach to sustainability assessment demonstrates its application through the use of illustrative data and describes its application to an existing case study where researchers had applied a number of multi criteria analysis tools. It was concluded that the discriminatory analysis provided a useful addition to the decision-makers toolbox as it provided a means of assessment of the validity of the application of the simple arithmetic averaging technique.",
author = "Valeriy Barannik and Blackwood, {David J.} and Falconer, {Ruth E.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
language = "English",
editor = "M. Horner and C. Hardcastle and A. Price and J. Bebbington",
booktitle = "International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment",
publisher = "SUE-MoT",

}

Barannik, V, Blackwood, DJ & Falconer, RE 2007, Increasing discrimination in multi-criteria analysis. in M Horner, C Hardcastle, A Price & J Bebbington (eds), International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment. SUE-MoT, Glasgow, SUE-MoT Conference 2007, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 27/06/07.

Increasing discrimination in multi-criteria analysis. / Barannik, Valeriy; Blackwood, David J.; Falconer, Ruth E.

International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment. ed. / M. Horner; C. Hardcastle; A. Price; J. Bebbington. Glasgow : SUE-MoT, 2007.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Increasing discrimination in multi-criteria analysis

AU - Barannik, Valeriy

AU - Blackwood, David J.

AU - Falconer, Ruth E.

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Multi criteria methods for supporting decision-making procedures are widely used in sustainability assessment. One of the most important steps in decision-making procedures is the evaluation of policy options or alternatives in order to find a hierarchy of option choices. Utility function value distributions are often constructed for the range of indicators for the options to be assessed. This distribution can be presented as an impact matrix stacked with indicator weights to reflect the relative importance of different indicators for the decision-maker. Solving rules are then introduced to integrate all individual indicator evaluations into a single integral utility estimation. These are often based on the averaging procedures, one of the simplest being arithmetic averaging. Whilst averaging rules are very attractive to decision makers due to their simplicity and logical transparency, using averaging as the first step of the decision-making procedures can significantly reduce the discrimination of the options, especially if there are counteractive individual indicator estimations.This paper proposes a method to evaluate and overcome this loss of discrimination. The paper explains the basis of a discriminatory analysis approach to sustainability assessment demonstrates its application through the use of illustrative data and describes its application to an existing case study where researchers had applied a number of multi criteria analysis tools. It was concluded that the discriminatory analysis provided a useful addition to the decision-makers toolbox as it provided a means of assessment of the validity of the application of the simple arithmetic averaging technique.

AB - Multi criteria methods for supporting decision-making procedures are widely used in sustainability assessment. One of the most important steps in decision-making procedures is the evaluation of policy options or alternatives in order to find a hierarchy of option choices. Utility function value distributions are often constructed for the range of indicators for the options to be assessed. This distribution can be presented as an impact matrix stacked with indicator weights to reflect the relative importance of different indicators for the decision-maker. Solving rules are then introduced to integrate all individual indicator evaluations into a single integral utility estimation. These are often based on the averaging procedures, one of the simplest being arithmetic averaging. Whilst averaging rules are very attractive to decision makers due to their simplicity and logical transparency, using averaging as the first step of the decision-making procedures can significantly reduce the discrimination of the options, especially if there are counteractive individual indicator estimations.This paper proposes a method to evaluate and overcome this loss of discrimination. The paper explains the basis of a discriminatory analysis approach to sustainability assessment demonstrates its application through the use of illustrative data and describes its application to an existing case study where researchers had applied a number of multi criteria analysis tools. It was concluded that the discriminatory analysis provided a useful addition to the decision-makers toolbox as it provided a means of assessment of the validity of the application of the simple arithmetic averaging technique.

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment

A2 - Horner, M.

A2 - Hardcastle, C.

A2 - Price, A.

A2 - Bebbington, J.

PB - SUE-MoT

CY - Glasgow

ER -

Barannik V, Blackwood DJ, Falconer RE. Increasing discrimination in multi-criteria analysis. In Horner M, Hardcastle C, Price A, Bebbington J, editors, International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment. Glasgow: SUE-MoT. 2007