Individual differences in dominance perception: dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance

Christopher D. Watkins, Benedict C. Jones, Lisa M. DeBruine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Masculine facial characteristics are associated with indices of men’s dominance. Previous research found that shorter men were more likely to attribute high dominance to masculine men, suggesting that dominant men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men than relatively subordinate men are. In the current study, we tested for novel evidence for this hypothesis. We observed a negative correlation between men’s own dominance, assessed using the dominance subscale of the international personality items pool, and the extent to which they attributed dominance to masculine male, but not female, faces. Such variation in dominance perception supports the proposal that less dominant men are more sensitive to cues of dominance in other men and may be adaptive if less dominant men incur greater costs if they incorrectly perceive the dominance of male rivals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)943-947
Number of pages5
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Individuality
Cues
Personality
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Cite this

@article{a00796a31e904d4ebf11f3ae5c2e06b1,
title = "Individual differences in dominance perception: dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance",
abstract = "Masculine facial characteristics are associated with indices of men’s dominance. Previous research found that shorter men were more likely to attribute high dominance to masculine men, suggesting that dominant men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men than relatively subordinate men are. In the current study, we tested for novel evidence for this hypothesis. We observed a negative correlation between men’s own dominance, assessed using the dominance subscale of the international personality items pool, and the extent to which they attributed dominance to masculine male, but not female, faces. Such variation in dominance perception supports the proposal that less dominant men are more sensitive to cues of dominance in other men and may be adaptive if less dominant men incur greater costs if they incorrectly perceive the dominance of male rivals.",
author = "Watkins, {Christopher D.} and Jones, {Benedict C.} and DeBruine, {Lisa M.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.006",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "943--947",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

Individual differences in dominance perception : dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance. / Watkins, Christopher D.; Jones, Benedict C.; DeBruine, Lisa M.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 21, No. 5, 12.2010, p. 943-947.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in dominance perception

T2 - dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance

AU - Watkins, Christopher D.

AU - Jones, Benedict C.

AU - DeBruine, Lisa M.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Masculine facial characteristics are associated with indices of men’s dominance. Previous research found that shorter men were more likely to attribute high dominance to masculine men, suggesting that dominant men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men than relatively subordinate men are. In the current study, we tested for novel evidence for this hypothesis. We observed a negative correlation between men’s own dominance, assessed using the dominance subscale of the international personality items pool, and the extent to which they attributed dominance to masculine male, but not female, faces. Such variation in dominance perception supports the proposal that less dominant men are more sensitive to cues of dominance in other men and may be adaptive if less dominant men incur greater costs if they incorrectly perceive the dominance of male rivals.

AB - Masculine facial characteristics are associated with indices of men’s dominance. Previous research found that shorter men were more likely to attribute high dominance to masculine men, suggesting that dominant men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men than relatively subordinate men are. In the current study, we tested for novel evidence for this hypothesis. We observed a negative correlation between men’s own dominance, assessed using the dominance subscale of the international personality items pool, and the extent to which they attributed dominance to masculine male, but not female, faces. Such variation in dominance perception supports the proposal that less dominant men are more sensitive to cues of dominance in other men and may be adaptive if less dominant men incur greater costs if they incorrectly perceive the dominance of male rivals.

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.006

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 943

EP - 947

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 5

ER -