Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1055-1058 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Mycological Research |
| Volume | 99 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sep 1995 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Induction of transient thermotolerance in Serpula lacrymans and S. himantioides following exposure to supraoptimal (sublethal) temperatures. / White, Nia A.; Buultjens, T. E. J.; Palfreyman, John W.
In: Mycological Research, Vol. 99, No. 9, 09.1995, p. 1055-1058.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Induction of transient thermotolerance in Serpula lacrymans and S. himantioides following exposure to supraoptimal (sublethal) temperatures
AU - White, Nia A.
AU - Buultjens, T. E. J.
AU - Palfreyman, John W.
PY - 1995/9
Y1 - 1995/9
N2 - The optimum (22 and 25 °C respectively), supraoptimal (sublethal) and the minimum lethal temperature regimes for Serpula lacrymans and S. himantioides were established. Exposure of S. lacrymans and S. himantioides to supraoptimal temperature regimes induced a transient tolerance to subsequent, normally lethal heat treatments (40° for 2 and 3 h respectively). An optimum thermotolerance training ‘window’ of 28° for 24 h and 25° for 48 h was appropriate for S. lacrymans, whereas thermotolerance training improved at 28 and 30° with increasing period (1–72 h) in the case of S. himantioides. The reported thermosensitivity of S. lacrymans compared to S. himantioides appears to be reflected in the contrasting thermotolerance-training profiles presented here, and may contribute to the general absence of S. lacrymans from the wild in temperate Europe.
AB - The optimum (22 and 25 °C respectively), supraoptimal (sublethal) and the minimum lethal temperature regimes for Serpula lacrymans and S. himantioides were established. Exposure of S. lacrymans and S. himantioides to supraoptimal temperature regimes induced a transient tolerance to subsequent, normally lethal heat treatments (40° for 2 and 3 h respectively). An optimum thermotolerance training ‘window’ of 28° for 24 h and 25° for 48 h was appropriate for S. lacrymans, whereas thermotolerance training improved at 28 and 30° with increasing period (1–72 h) in the case of S. himantioides. The reported thermosensitivity of S. lacrymans compared to S. himantioides appears to be reflected in the contrasting thermotolerance-training profiles presented here, and may contribute to the general absence of S. lacrymans from the wild in temperate Europe.
U2 - 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80772-7
DO - 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80772-7
M3 - Article
VL - 99
SP - 1055
EP - 1058
JO - Fungal Biology
JF - Fungal Biology
SN - 1878-6146
IS - 9
ER -