Influence of vitamin C and vitamin E on redox signalling: implications for exercise adaptations

James N. Cobley*, Helen McHardy, James P. Morton, Michalis G. Nikolaidis, Graeme L. Close

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)
62 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The exogenous antioxidants vitamin C (ascorbate) and vitamin E (α-tocopherol) often blunt favourable cell signalling responses to exercise, suggesting that redox signalling contributes to exercise adaptations. Current theories posit that this antioxidant paradigm interferes with redox signalling by attenuating exercise-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generation. The well-documented in vitro antioxidant actions of ascorbate and α-tocopherol and characterisation of the type and source of the ROS/RNS produced during exercise theoretically enables identification of the redox-dependent mechanism responsible for the blunting of favourable cell signalling responses to exercise. This review aimed to apply this reasoning to determine how the aforementioned antioxidants might attenuate exercise-induced ROS/RNS production. The principal outcomes of this analysis are (1) neither antioxidant is likely to attenuate nitric oxide signalling either directly (reaction with nitric oxide) or indirectly (reaction with derivatives, e.g. peroxynitrite) (2) neither antioxidant reacts appreciably with hydrogen peroxide, a key effector of redox signalling (3) ascorbate but not α-tocopherol has the capacity to attenuate exercise-induced superoxide generation and (4) alternate mechanisms, namely pro-oxidant side reactions and/or reduction of bioactive oxidised macromolecule adducts, are unlikely to interfere with exercise-induced redox signalling. Out of all the possibilities considered, ascorbate mediated suppression of superoxide generation with attendant implications for hydrogen peroxide signalling is arguably the most cogent explanation for blunting of favourable cell signalling responses to exercise. However, this mechanism is dependent on ascorbate accumulating at sites rich in NADPH oxidases, principal contributors to contraction mediated superoxide generation, and outcompeting nitric oxide and superoxide dismutase isoforms. The major conclusions of this review are: (1) direct evidence for interference of ascorbate and α-tocopherol with exercise-induced ROS/RNS production is lacking (2) theoretical analysis reveals that both antioxidants are unlikely to have a major impact on exercise-induced redox signalling and (3) it is worth considering alternate redox-independent mechanisms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-76
Number of pages12
JournalFree Radical Biology and Medicine
Volume84
Early online date2 Apr 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2015

Fingerprint

Vitamin E
Ascorbic Acid
Oxidation-Reduction
Antioxidants
Reactive Nitrogen Species
Tocopherols
Reactive Oxygen Species
Cell signaling
Superoxides
Nitric Oxide
Hydrogen Peroxide
Peroxynitrous Acid
NADPH Oxidase
Macromolecules
Superoxide Dismutase
Protein Isoforms
Derivatives

Cite this

Cobley, James N. ; McHardy, Helen ; Morton, James P. ; Nikolaidis, Michalis G. ; Close, Graeme L. / Influence of vitamin C and vitamin E on redox signalling : implications for exercise adaptations. In: Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 84. pp. 65-76.
@article{59b05db43a71433380c8e89ca7b70a5f,
title = "Influence of vitamin C and vitamin E on redox signalling: implications for exercise adaptations",
abstract = "The exogenous antioxidants vitamin C (ascorbate) and vitamin E (α-tocopherol) often blunt favourable cell signalling responses to exercise, suggesting that redox signalling contributes to exercise adaptations. Current theories posit that this antioxidant paradigm interferes with redox signalling by attenuating exercise-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generation. The well-documented in vitro antioxidant actions of ascorbate and α-tocopherol and characterisation of the type and source of the ROS/RNS produced during exercise theoretically enables identification of the redox-dependent mechanism responsible for the blunting of favourable cell signalling responses to exercise. This review aimed to apply this reasoning to determine how the aforementioned antioxidants might attenuate exercise-induced ROS/RNS production. The principal outcomes of this analysis are (1) neither antioxidant is likely to attenuate nitric oxide signalling either directly (reaction with nitric oxide) or indirectly (reaction with derivatives, e.g. peroxynitrite) (2) neither antioxidant reacts appreciably with hydrogen peroxide, a key effector of redox signalling (3) ascorbate but not α-tocopherol has the capacity to attenuate exercise-induced superoxide generation and (4) alternate mechanisms, namely pro-oxidant side reactions and/or reduction of bioactive oxidised macromolecule adducts, are unlikely to interfere with exercise-induced redox signalling. Out of all the possibilities considered, ascorbate mediated suppression of superoxide generation with attendant implications for hydrogen peroxide signalling is arguably the most cogent explanation for blunting of favourable cell signalling responses to exercise. However, this mechanism is dependent on ascorbate accumulating at sites rich in NADPH oxidases, principal contributors to contraction mediated superoxide generation, and outcompeting nitric oxide and superoxide dismutase isoforms. The major conclusions of this review are: (1) direct evidence for interference of ascorbate and α-tocopherol with exercise-induced ROS/RNS production is lacking (2) theoretical analysis reveals that both antioxidants are unlikely to have a major impact on exercise-induced redox signalling and (3) it is worth considering alternate redox-independent mechanisms.",
author = "Cobley, {James N.} and Helen McHardy and Morton, {James P.} and Nikolaidis, {Michalis G.} and Close, {Graeme L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.03.018",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "65--76",
journal = "Free Radical Biology and Medicine",
issn = "0891-5849",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Influence of vitamin C and vitamin E on redox signalling : implications for exercise adaptations. / Cobley, James N.; McHardy, Helen; Morton, James P.; Nikolaidis, Michalis G.; Close, Graeme L.

In: Free Radical Biology and Medicine, Vol. 84, 07.2015, p. 65-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of vitamin C and vitamin E on redox signalling

T2 - implications for exercise adaptations

AU - Cobley, James N.

AU - McHardy, Helen

AU - Morton, James P.

AU - Nikolaidis, Michalis G.

AU - Close, Graeme L.

PY - 2015/7

Y1 - 2015/7

N2 - The exogenous antioxidants vitamin C (ascorbate) and vitamin E (α-tocopherol) often blunt favourable cell signalling responses to exercise, suggesting that redox signalling contributes to exercise adaptations. Current theories posit that this antioxidant paradigm interferes with redox signalling by attenuating exercise-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generation. The well-documented in vitro antioxidant actions of ascorbate and α-tocopherol and characterisation of the type and source of the ROS/RNS produced during exercise theoretically enables identification of the redox-dependent mechanism responsible for the blunting of favourable cell signalling responses to exercise. This review aimed to apply this reasoning to determine how the aforementioned antioxidants might attenuate exercise-induced ROS/RNS production. The principal outcomes of this analysis are (1) neither antioxidant is likely to attenuate nitric oxide signalling either directly (reaction with nitric oxide) or indirectly (reaction with derivatives, e.g. peroxynitrite) (2) neither antioxidant reacts appreciably with hydrogen peroxide, a key effector of redox signalling (3) ascorbate but not α-tocopherol has the capacity to attenuate exercise-induced superoxide generation and (4) alternate mechanisms, namely pro-oxidant side reactions and/or reduction of bioactive oxidised macromolecule adducts, are unlikely to interfere with exercise-induced redox signalling. Out of all the possibilities considered, ascorbate mediated suppression of superoxide generation with attendant implications for hydrogen peroxide signalling is arguably the most cogent explanation for blunting of favourable cell signalling responses to exercise. However, this mechanism is dependent on ascorbate accumulating at sites rich in NADPH oxidases, principal contributors to contraction mediated superoxide generation, and outcompeting nitric oxide and superoxide dismutase isoforms. The major conclusions of this review are: (1) direct evidence for interference of ascorbate and α-tocopherol with exercise-induced ROS/RNS production is lacking (2) theoretical analysis reveals that both antioxidants are unlikely to have a major impact on exercise-induced redox signalling and (3) it is worth considering alternate redox-independent mechanisms.

AB - The exogenous antioxidants vitamin C (ascorbate) and vitamin E (α-tocopherol) often blunt favourable cell signalling responses to exercise, suggesting that redox signalling contributes to exercise adaptations. Current theories posit that this antioxidant paradigm interferes with redox signalling by attenuating exercise-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generation. The well-documented in vitro antioxidant actions of ascorbate and α-tocopherol and characterisation of the type and source of the ROS/RNS produced during exercise theoretically enables identification of the redox-dependent mechanism responsible for the blunting of favourable cell signalling responses to exercise. This review aimed to apply this reasoning to determine how the aforementioned antioxidants might attenuate exercise-induced ROS/RNS production. The principal outcomes of this analysis are (1) neither antioxidant is likely to attenuate nitric oxide signalling either directly (reaction with nitric oxide) or indirectly (reaction with derivatives, e.g. peroxynitrite) (2) neither antioxidant reacts appreciably with hydrogen peroxide, a key effector of redox signalling (3) ascorbate but not α-tocopherol has the capacity to attenuate exercise-induced superoxide generation and (4) alternate mechanisms, namely pro-oxidant side reactions and/or reduction of bioactive oxidised macromolecule adducts, are unlikely to interfere with exercise-induced redox signalling. Out of all the possibilities considered, ascorbate mediated suppression of superoxide generation with attendant implications for hydrogen peroxide signalling is arguably the most cogent explanation for blunting of favourable cell signalling responses to exercise. However, this mechanism is dependent on ascorbate accumulating at sites rich in NADPH oxidases, principal contributors to contraction mediated superoxide generation, and outcompeting nitric oxide and superoxide dismutase isoforms. The major conclusions of this review are: (1) direct evidence for interference of ascorbate and α-tocopherol with exercise-induced ROS/RNS production is lacking (2) theoretical analysis reveals that both antioxidants are unlikely to have a major impact on exercise-induced redox signalling and (3) it is worth considering alternate redox-independent mechanisms.

U2 - 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.03.018

DO - 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.03.018

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 65

EP - 76

JO - Free Radical Biology and Medicine

JF - Free Radical Biology and Medicine

SN - 0891-5849

ER -