Internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes

Yi-Ying Chang, Mathew Hughes, Sabine Hotho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior studies have suggested that organizational and environmental antecedents are influential to the development of a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity, which are proposed to be central to superior firm performance. However, little is known about how such antecedents affect the shaping of innovation ambidexterity in small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and how these innovations go on to shape firm performance. This paper aims to examine internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes. The research used a survey method to investigate the 1,000 small-and medium sized enterprises in Scotland. Firms were randomly selected from the FAME database. Of this sample, 265 firms (26.5 percent) responded to the survey. The data analysis reveals that internal organizational structures in a highly dynamic environment stimulate the appearance of innovation ambidexterity. Moreover, it is found that the relationship between organizational and environmental forces and firm performance is partially mediated by a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity. The results show how dangerous the lack of adequate research of these issues at the SME level is. By contrast to larger firms, the results show how internal organizational structures and external environmental conditions affect SMEs to pursue a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity. Prior studies have paid little attention to the effects of internal organizational structures and external environmental conditions on the appearance of a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity within SMEs. This paper fills some of the gaps.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1658-1676
Number of pages19
JournalManagement Decision
Volume49
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Innovation
Small to medium-sized enterprises
Ambidexterity
Firm performance
Organizational structure
Environmental conditions
Scotland
Data base
Large firms
Small and medium-sized enterprises
Dynamic environment

Cite this

Chang, Yi-Ying ; Hughes, Mathew ; Hotho, Sabine. / Internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes. In: Management Decision. 2011 ; Vol. 49, No. 10. pp. 1658-1676.
@article{d989c43e00174ad188829c25f186ba03,
title = "Internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes",
abstract = "Prior studies have suggested that organizational and environmental antecedents are influential to the development of a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity, which are proposed to be central to superior firm performance. However, little is known about how such antecedents affect the shaping of innovation ambidexterity in small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and how these innovations go on to shape firm performance. This paper aims to examine internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes. The research used a survey method to investigate the 1,000 small-and medium sized enterprises in Scotland. Firms were randomly selected from the FAME database. Of this sample, 265 firms (26.5 percent) responded to the survey. The data analysis reveals that internal organizational structures in a highly dynamic environment stimulate the appearance of innovation ambidexterity. Moreover, it is found that the relationship between organizational and environmental forces and firm performance is partially mediated by a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity. The results show how dangerous the lack of adequate research of these issues at the SME level is. By contrast to larger firms, the results show how internal organizational structures and external environmental conditions affect SMEs to pursue a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity. Prior studies have paid little attention to the effects of internal organizational structures and external environmental conditions on the appearance of a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity within SMEs. This paper fills some of the gaps.",
author = "Yi-Ying Chang and Mathew Hughes and Sabine Hotho",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1108/00251741111183816",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1658--1676",
journal = "Management Decision",
issn = "0025-1747",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "10",

}

Internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes. / Chang, Yi-Ying; Hughes, Mathew; Hotho, Sabine.

In: Management Decision, Vol. 49, No. 10, 2011, p. 1658-1676.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes

AU - Chang, Yi-Ying

AU - Hughes, Mathew

AU - Hotho, Sabine

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Prior studies have suggested that organizational and environmental antecedents are influential to the development of a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity, which are proposed to be central to superior firm performance. However, little is known about how such antecedents affect the shaping of innovation ambidexterity in small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and how these innovations go on to shape firm performance. This paper aims to examine internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes. The research used a survey method to investigate the 1,000 small-and medium sized enterprises in Scotland. Firms were randomly selected from the FAME database. Of this sample, 265 firms (26.5 percent) responded to the survey. The data analysis reveals that internal organizational structures in a highly dynamic environment stimulate the appearance of innovation ambidexterity. Moreover, it is found that the relationship between organizational and environmental forces and firm performance is partially mediated by a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity. The results show how dangerous the lack of adequate research of these issues at the SME level is. By contrast to larger firms, the results show how internal organizational structures and external environmental conditions affect SMEs to pursue a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity. Prior studies have paid little attention to the effects of internal organizational structures and external environmental conditions on the appearance of a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity within SMEs. This paper fills some of the gaps.

AB - Prior studies have suggested that organizational and environmental antecedents are influential to the development of a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity, which are proposed to be central to superior firm performance. However, little is known about how such antecedents affect the shaping of innovation ambidexterity in small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and how these innovations go on to shape firm performance. This paper aims to examine internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes. The research used a survey method to investigate the 1,000 small-and medium sized enterprises in Scotland. Firms were randomly selected from the FAME database. Of this sample, 265 firms (26.5 percent) responded to the survey. The data analysis reveals that internal organizational structures in a highly dynamic environment stimulate the appearance of innovation ambidexterity. Moreover, it is found that the relationship between organizational and environmental forces and firm performance is partially mediated by a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity. The results show how dangerous the lack of adequate research of these issues at the SME level is. By contrast to larger firms, the results show how internal organizational structures and external environmental conditions affect SMEs to pursue a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity. Prior studies have paid little attention to the effects of internal organizational structures and external environmental conditions on the appearance of a balance dimension of innovation ambidexterity within SMEs. This paper fills some of the gaps.

U2 - 10.1108/00251741111183816

DO - 10.1108/00251741111183816

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 1658

EP - 1676

JO - Management Decision

JF - Management Decision

SN - 0025-1747

IS - 10

ER -