Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming

Katherine Messenger, Holly P. Branigan, Janet F. McLean, Antonella Sorace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research suggests that English-speaking children comprehend agent–patient verb passives earlier than experiencer–theme verb passives (Maratsos, Fox, Becker, & Chalkley, 1985). We report three experiments examining whether such effects reflect delayed acquisition of the passive syntax or instead are an artifact of the experimental task, relating to children’s poor picture recognition for such verbs. In two syntactic priming experiments, 3- and 4-year-olds produced more agent–patient passives after hearing passive primes involving agent–patient and theme–experiencer verbs (Experiment 1), and theme–experiencer and experiencer–theme verbs (Experiment 2), than after corresponding active primes; moreover, the magnitude of priming was unaffected by verb type. However, a picture-sentence matching task (Experiment 3) replicated previous findings: Children performed more poorly on experiencer–theme sentences than agent–patient sentences. Our results suggest that children’s acquisition of passive syntax is not delayed, and that semantic effects found in previous studies may instead be task-related.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)568-587
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume66
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Syntactics
syntax
experiment
Semantics
Artifacts
Hearing
evidence
Experiments
Research
Audition
speaking
artifact
semantics
Syntax
Syntactic Priming
Experiment
Verbs
Passive Verbs

Cite this

Messenger, Katherine ; Branigan, Holly P. ; McLean, Janet F. ; Sorace, Antonella. / Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. In: Journal of Memory and Language. 2012 ; Vol. 66, No. 4. pp. 568-587.
@article{a698c6ae4dfa4bfdadb466152536a35e,
title = "Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming",
abstract = "Previous research suggests that English-speaking children comprehend agent–patient verb passives earlier than experiencer–theme verb passives (Maratsos, Fox, Becker, & Chalkley, 1985). We report three experiments examining whether such effects reflect delayed acquisition of the passive syntax or instead are an artifact of the experimental task, relating to children’s poor picture recognition for such verbs. In two syntactic priming experiments, 3- and 4-year-olds produced more agent–patient passives after hearing passive primes involving agent–patient and theme–experiencer verbs (Experiment 1), and theme–experiencer and experiencer–theme verbs (Experiment 2), than after corresponding active primes; moreover, the magnitude of priming was unaffected by verb type. However, a picture-sentence matching task (Experiment 3) replicated previous findings: Children performed more poorly on experiencer–theme sentences than agent–patient sentences. Our results suggest that children’s acquisition of passive syntax is not delayed, and that semantic effects found in previous studies may instead be task-related.",
author = "Katherine Messenger and Branigan, {Holly P.} and McLean, {Janet F.} and Antonella Sorace",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.008",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "568--587",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. / Messenger, Katherine; Branigan, Holly P.; McLean, Janet F.; Sorace, Antonella.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 66, No. 4, 05.2012, p. 568-587.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming

AU - Messenger, Katherine

AU - Branigan, Holly P.

AU - McLean, Janet F.

AU - Sorace, Antonella

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Previous research suggests that English-speaking children comprehend agent–patient verb passives earlier than experiencer–theme verb passives (Maratsos, Fox, Becker, & Chalkley, 1985). We report three experiments examining whether such effects reflect delayed acquisition of the passive syntax or instead are an artifact of the experimental task, relating to children’s poor picture recognition for such verbs. In two syntactic priming experiments, 3- and 4-year-olds produced more agent–patient passives after hearing passive primes involving agent–patient and theme–experiencer verbs (Experiment 1), and theme–experiencer and experiencer–theme verbs (Experiment 2), than after corresponding active primes; moreover, the magnitude of priming was unaffected by verb type. However, a picture-sentence matching task (Experiment 3) replicated previous findings: Children performed more poorly on experiencer–theme sentences than agent–patient sentences. Our results suggest that children’s acquisition of passive syntax is not delayed, and that semantic effects found in previous studies may instead be task-related.

AB - Previous research suggests that English-speaking children comprehend agent–patient verb passives earlier than experiencer–theme verb passives (Maratsos, Fox, Becker, & Chalkley, 1985). We report three experiments examining whether such effects reflect delayed acquisition of the passive syntax or instead are an artifact of the experimental task, relating to children’s poor picture recognition for such verbs. In two syntactic priming experiments, 3- and 4-year-olds produced more agent–patient passives after hearing passive primes involving agent–patient and theme–experiencer verbs (Experiment 1), and theme–experiencer and experiencer–theme verbs (Experiment 2), than after corresponding active primes; moreover, the magnitude of priming was unaffected by verb type. However, a picture-sentence matching task (Experiment 3) replicated previous findings: Children performed more poorly on experiencer–theme sentences than agent–patient sentences. Our results suggest that children’s acquisition of passive syntax is not delayed, and that semantic effects found in previous studies may instead be task-related.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.008

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 568

EP - 587

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 4

ER -