Law’s invisible women: the unintended gendered consequences of the COVID-19 lockdown

Lynsey Mitchell, Michelle Weldon-Johns

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    91 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article examines the unintended gendered consequences of lockdown on women’s rights, particularly those related to women’s work, health and wellbeing. Situating this assessment within wider feminist legal scholarship, which exposes the gendered nature of law and the tendency to legislate in a way that prioritises a privileged male legal subject, we argue that legislation and subsequent decisions fail to centre women’s lived experiences and so deprioritise women’s needs. We ultimately argue that lessons need to be learned regarding how post-pandemic responses are implemented to mitigate the impacts on women and ensure gender is mainstreamed within the law-making process.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)188-217
    Number of pages30
    JournalAmicus Curiae
    Volume3
    Issue number2
    Early online date28 Feb 2022
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2022

    Keywords

    • Women
    • COVID-19
    • Flexible working
    • Care
    • Telemedicine
    • Abortion
    • Gender mainstreaming

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Law’s invisible women: the unintended gendered consequences of the COVID-19 lockdown'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this