Lay perceptions of an expert witness in a sexual discrimination in the workplace case

Lloyd Carson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study reprised social psychologist Susan Fiske's role as expert witness in a sexual discrimination case in which a claim was successfully brought by an assertive female accountant against her employers, Price Waterhouse. It explored whether a female expert would be judged by mock jurors as more effective than a male expert in the case of an equivalent gender role-violating (i.e. feminine) male employee, and whether judgements would be influenced by the employee's occupation type—male dominated (accountancy) or female dominated (midwifery). Participants responded to a range of case-related questions after reading a ‘judge's summary’ of a hypothetical action alleging sexual discrimination in the workplace by means of sexual stereotyping. Expert witness' sex, plaintiff's (i.e. employee's) sex, and workplace type were manipulated in the summary. Evidence for the greater effectiveness of a female social science expert in the ‘gender domain congruent’ area of sexual stereotyping was found; however, plaintiff's sex and occupation type did not influence the participants' judgements except that experts supporting female plaintiffs were viewed positively. The participants' attitudes towards the case, and to other personnel involved, were negative. Analysis of the participants' comments indicated considerable distrust of and scepticism about social science.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107–123
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
Volume5
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Expert Testimony
Workplace
Discrimination (Psychology)
Stereotyping
Social Sciences
Occupations
Midwifery
Psychology

Cite this

Carson, Lloyd / Lay perceptions of an expert witness in a sexual discrimination in the workplace case.

In: Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Vol. 5, No. 1-2, 2008, p. 107–123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cec3f6f3cf4b419194218cacfc1f93ec,
title = "Lay perceptions of an expert witness in a sexual discrimination in the workplace case",
abstract = "This study reprised social psychologist Susan Fiske's role as expert witness in a sexual discrimination case in which a claim was successfully brought by an assertive female accountant against her employers, Price Waterhouse. It explored whether a female expert would be judged by mock jurors as more effective than a male expert in the case of an equivalent gender role-violating (i.e. feminine) male employee, and whether judgements would be influenced by the employee's occupation type—male dominated (accountancy) or female dominated (midwifery). Participants responded to a range of case-related questions after reading a ‘judge's summary’ of a hypothetical action alleging sexual discrimination in the workplace by means of sexual stereotyping. Expert witness' sex, plaintiff's (i.e. employee's) sex, and workplace type were manipulated in the summary. Evidence for the greater effectiveness of a female social science expert in the ‘gender domain congruent’ area of sexual stereotyping was found; however, plaintiff's sex and occupation type did not influence the participants' judgements except that experts supporting female plaintiffs were viewed positively. The participants' attitudes towards the case, and to other personnel involved, were negative. Analysis of the participants' comments indicated considerable distrust of and scepticism about social science.",
author = "Lloyd Carson",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1002/jip.81",
volume = "5",
pages = "107–123",
journal = "Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling",
issn = "1544-4759",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1-2",

}

Lay perceptions of an expert witness in a sexual discrimination in the workplace case. / Carson, Lloyd.

In: Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, Vol. 5, No. 1-2, 2008, p. 107–123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lay perceptions of an expert witness in a sexual discrimination in the workplace case

AU - Carson,Lloyd

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This study reprised social psychologist Susan Fiske's role as expert witness in a sexual discrimination case in which a claim was successfully brought by an assertive female accountant against her employers, Price Waterhouse. It explored whether a female expert would be judged by mock jurors as more effective than a male expert in the case of an equivalent gender role-violating (i.e. feminine) male employee, and whether judgements would be influenced by the employee's occupation type—male dominated (accountancy) or female dominated (midwifery). Participants responded to a range of case-related questions after reading a ‘judge's summary’ of a hypothetical action alleging sexual discrimination in the workplace by means of sexual stereotyping. Expert witness' sex, plaintiff's (i.e. employee's) sex, and workplace type were manipulated in the summary. Evidence for the greater effectiveness of a female social science expert in the ‘gender domain congruent’ area of sexual stereotyping was found; however, plaintiff's sex and occupation type did not influence the participants' judgements except that experts supporting female plaintiffs were viewed positively. The participants' attitudes towards the case, and to other personnel involved, were negative. Analysis of the participants' comments indicated considerable distrust of and scepticism about social science.

AB - This study reprised social psychologist Susan Fiske's role as expert witness in a sexual discrimination case in which a claim was successfully brought by an assertive female accountant against her employers, Price Waterhouse. It explored whether a female expert would be judged by mock jurors as more effective than a male expert in the case of an equivalent gender role-violating (i.e. feminine) male employee, and whether judgements would be influenced by the employee's occupation type—male dominated (accountancy) or female dominated (midwifery). Participants responded to a range of case-related questions after reading a ‘judge's summary’ of a hypothetical action alleging sexual discrimination in the workplace by means of sexual stereotyping. Expert witness' sex, plaintiff's (i.e. employee's) sex, and workplace type were manipulated in the summary. Evidence for the greater effectiveness of a female social science expert in the ‘gender domain congruent’ area of sexual stereotyping was found; however, plaintiff's sex and occupation type did not influence the participants' judgements except that experts supporting female plaintiffs were viewed positively. The participants' attitudes towards the case, and to other personnel involved, were negative. Analysis of the participants' comments indicated considerable distrust of and scepticism about social science.

U2 - 10.1002/jip.81

DO - 10.1002/jip.81

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 107

EP - 123

JO - Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling

T2 - Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling

JF - Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling

SN - 1544-4759

IS - 1-2

ER -