Learning analytics: challenges and limitations

Anna Wilson, Cate Watson, Terrie L. Thompson, Valerie Drew, Sarah Doyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Learning analytic implementations are increasingly being included in learning management systems in higher education. We lay out some concerns with the way learning analytics – both data and algorithms – are often presented within an unproblematized Big Data discourse. We describe some potential problems with the often implicit assumptions about learning and learners – and indeed the tendency not to theorize learning explicitly – that underpin such implementations. Finally, we describe an attempt to devise our own analytics, grounded in a sociomaterial conception of learning. We use the data obtained to suggest that the relationships between learning and the digital traces left by participants in online learning are far from trivial, and that any analytics that relies on these as proxies for learning tends towards a behaviourist evaluation of learning processes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)991-1007
Number of pages17
JournalTeaching in Higher Education
Volume22
Issue number8
Early online date24 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

learning
learning process
discourse
evaluation
management
education

Cite this

Wilson, A., Watson, C., Thompson, T. L., Drew, V., & Doyle, S. (2017). Learning analytics: challenges and limitations. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(8), 991-1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332026
Wilson, Anna ; Watson, Cate ; Thompson, Terrie L. ; Drew, Valerie ; Doyle, Sarah. / Learning analytics : challenges and limitations. In: Teaching in Higher Education. 2017 ; Vol. 22, No. 8. pp. 991-1007.
@article{c7a2d1dd49d64662bdd23106485b32e4,
title = "Learning analytics: challenges and limitations",
abstract = "Learning analytic implementations are increasingly being included in learning management systems in higher education. We lay out some concerns with the way learning analytics – both data and algorithms – are often presented within an unproblematized Big Data discourse. We describe some potential problems with the often implicit assumptions about learning and learners – and indeed the tendency not to theorize learning explicitly – that underpin such implementations. Finally, we describe an attempt to devise our own analytics, grounded in a sociomaterial conception of learning. We use the data obtained to suggest that the relationships between learning and the digital traces left by participants in online learning are far from trivial, and that any analytics that relies on these as proxies for learning tends towards a behaviourist evaluation of learning processes.",
author = "Anna Wilson and Cate Watson and Thompson, {Terrie L.} and Valerie Drew and Sarah Doyle",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/13562517.2017.1332026",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "991--1007",
journal = "Teaching in Higher Education",
issn = "1356-2517",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

Wilson, A, Watson, C, Thompson, TL, Drew, V & Doyle, S 2017, 'Learning analytics: challenges and limitations', Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 991-1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332026

Learning analytics : challenges and limitations. / Wilson, Anna; Watson, Cate; Thompson, Terrie L.; Drew, Valerie; Doyle, Sarah.

In: Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 22, No. 8, 17.11.2017, p. 991-1007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning analytics

T2 - challenges and limitations

AU - Wilson, Anna

AU - Watson, Cate

AU - Thompson, Terrie L.

AU - Drew, Valerie

AU - Doyle, Sarah

PY - 2017/11/17

Y1 - 2017/11/17

N2 - Learning analytic implementations are increasingly being included in learning management systems in higher education. We lay out some concerns with the way learning analytics – both data and algorithms – are often presented within an unproblematized Big Data discourse. We describe some potential problems with the often implicit assumptions about learning and learners – and indeed the tendency not to theorize learning explicitly – that underpin such implementations. Finally, we describe an attempt to devise our own analytics, grounded in a sociomaterial conception of learning. We use the data obtained to suggest that the relationships between learning and the digital traces left by participants in online learning are far from trivial, and that any analytics that relies on these as proxies for learning tends towards a behaviourist evaluation of learning processes.

AB - Learning analytic implementations are increasingly being included in learning management systems in higher education. We lay out some concerns with the way learning analytics – both data and algorithms – are often presented within an unproblematized Big Data discourse. We describe some potential problems with the often implicit assumptions about learning and learners – and indeed the tendency not to theorize learning explicitly – that underpin such implementations. Finally, we describe an attempt to devise our own analytics, grounded in a sociomaterial conception of learning. We use the data obtained to suggest that the relationships between learning and the digital traces left by participants in online learning are far from trivial, and that any analytics that relies on these as proxies for learning tends towards a behaviourist evaluation of learning processes.

U2 - 10.1080/13562517.2017.1332026

DO - 10.1080/13562517.2017.1332026

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 991

EP - 1007

JO - Teaching in Higher Education

JF - Teaching in Higher Education

SN - 1356-2517

IS - 8

ER -

Wilson A, Watson C, Thompson TL, Drew V, Doyle S. Learning analytics: challenges and limitations. Teaching in Higher Education. 2017 Nov 17;22(8):991-1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332026